|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 874
Location: Macedonia but not listed
|
Check out this m16 with m203 i think it is not a4 but it is definitely cooler than the one in PR it looks deadlier!I think this should be in PR! The one in PR more looks like m4
|
|
|
Last edited by PatrickLA_CA; 08-16-2009 at 12:59 PM..
Reason: sorry i forgot the picture
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 882
Location: Espoo, Finland
|
Maybe you should stop making these useless suggestions? That is M16A2 with M203, and M16A2 is not being used by Marines or the Army anymore.
I believe DEVs are not going to add unrealistic things into the game because "they're cool". |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
lol that picures just a low quality gif. couldnt get up whit anything better!? and red alerts right that A2 model is no longer in use and thhere is allrdy a model of that, in VANILLA! so go play that
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
I would love to see the M16A2 with M203 in PR but since the Marines are using the M16A4 now I have to stick with that.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
Lol, that is in Vanilla BF2. Who cares if it looks deadlier and cooler, I just want realism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,677
Location: Manchester
|
Sadly, this is project reality, not project cool gun (if it were, everyone would have MAC-10s, the coolest gun ever designed).
Additionally, this is a cosmetic suggestion and would not affect gameplay, so theres no real reason to impliment it. Also, to y'all saying that the A2 is being phased out, you're perfectly correct. But the weapon in the OP is an M16A1 (look at the rear sight group). Ultimately, the fact of the matter is that in US service the addition of a rail system to the M16A4 has rendered the traditional mounting system, as well as the heatshield that goes with it, obselete. (tbh, the A2 didnt really need the heat shield either, as the foregrips are a top half and a bottom half rather than left and right like on the A1). Locked. |
|
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Your powerful ... forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children. Now of course it's not true, but the world only believes what the media tells them to believe." - Kane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| m16a4 or w203, suggestion |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|