Of Bad 3D perspective and smoke

[TheLean]

I think the smoke grenades act that way for gameplay reasons, making smoke more useful, sometimes reality has to sit in the back seat while gameplay is driving. It is not for framerate reasons as suggested, the grenadiers smoke grenade gives away a large puff of smoke instantly that disperses rather quickly and it works fine.

[manligheten]

Originally Posted by TheLean

I think the smoke grenades act that way for gameplay reasons, making smoke more useful, sometimes reality has to sit in the back seat while gameplay is driving. It is not for framerate reasons as suggested, the grenadiers smoke grenade gives away a large puff of smoke instantly that disperses rather quickly and it works fine.

I'd say instant smoke would be more usefull.

[dominator200]

Well i dnt no about the us but i am pritty sure that the uk dnt have smoke grenades, insted the tanks dumps diesel fuel in to the exsuast which i tern creates massive amounts of smoke and obviously is continuos untill the fuel cant be dumped due to travling distance, however this only applies to the challenger 2 tank apc do have smoke grenades

[gclark03]

I'm sure the British have smoke grenades. They can't depend on Challengers alone for smoke screens.

[SkaterCrush]

I thought smoke takes a while to build up irl?

[Cheditor]

Depends, some do but when i go airsoft smokes we use deply in about 5 seconds.

[CryOfTheWulfen]

the brits do have smoke grenades, and although they build up faster than ive seen in PR the squad behind will already be organised and more focused than the average in PR