Aim to fire transistion

nick20404 · 03-26-2009, 08:52 AM

The aim to fire transition should be allot quicker, now when you aim your weapon it takes at least 2 seconds before you can fire after pressing the aim button and that is very unrealistic soldiers train to be able to react quickly and aim steady, currently you have to aim, than wait a seconds or two, than fire.

YouTube Video

As you can see in this training video it takes less than a second for him to get the scope and and fire his shot.

YouTube Video

YouTube Video

YouTube Video

Anhkhoa · 03-26-2009, 09:06 AM

"Gameplay issues" the 1337 no recoil quick aim = noob rambos

Rudd · 03-26-2009, 09:14 AM

Nice videos (if it wasn't youtube it would be good to extract the sound

)

but iirc the time for sighting in ingame is also portraying that ur eye must focus to the scope sight, which can't be portrayed any other way afaik.

Though I wouldn't mind the scopes being sped up a little, but atm I'm very happy with the speed gameplay wise.

Mary.au · 03-26-2009, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anhkhoa

"Gameplay issues" the 1337 no recoil quick aim = noob rambos

Not necessarily, if the time to brings the sights up was decreases, but the time for minimal deviation remained the same then even the fastest 1337 snapshot pr0's still wouldn't be able to hit anything unless they wait.

PR.IT Stek_WAR · 03-26-2009, 09:24 AM

what you say is already on this project reality: if you shoot right after you've targeted will notice that your shot will be very inaccurate!

instead expect a couple of seconds you'll notice the difference in accuracy!

Psykogundam · 03-26-2009, 09:40 AM

i think your wrong. aimpoint takes about a second to scope and fire (and just like these guys, it mightnt be accurate, but once you get a shot off in the right direction, it counts just the same) , acog takes 1.5 - 3 seconds. and these guys seem to be using aimpoints.

so post up soldiers using medium to long range scopes, who ARNT using the emergancy battle site on the top for a proper comparrison.

Smegburt_funkledink · 03-26-2009, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR.IT Stek_WAR

what you say is already on this project reality: if you shoot right after you've targeted will notice that your shot will be very inaccurate!

instead expect a couple of seconds you'll notice the difference in accuracy!

This has nothing to do with what the OP is talking about. Read:

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick20404

The aim to fire transition should be allot quicker, now when you aim your weapon it takes at least 2 seconds before you can fire after pressing the aim button....

2 seconds is a bit of an Exaggeration...

Hitperson · 03-26-2009, 10:33 AM

things like EoTechs should be faster to aim though.

nick20404 · 03-26-2009, 10:37 AM

This is mostly a problem in urban combat maps or close combat, if it could be changed it could stop things like both people diving to the ground 5 feet away from each other and opening up. Its kinda lame that you have a better chance of living like that.

If you had a quick aim and a decent accuracy in close combat you wouldn't have to hop around like a idiot or dive on the ground, close engagements would end quickly and realistically, and longer range combat would not change much as I am not suggesting the guns be more accurate but be ready to fire effectively quicker.

And you can never tell me you have not come around a corner ran into a full enemy squad and they all dive onto there belly's and light you up.

gazzthompson · 03-26-2009, 03:08 PM

most of them videos they used red dots, which in game are fast to draw.

in the last video he is using a ACOG, now im no expert on the matter but i highly doubt he is aiming down the sight, but drawing the weapon up and shooting "down the barrel" or what ever the technical term would be. which is best represented in game as hip firing because of the lack of shouldering the rifle but not looking down sighs (which i doubt is possible, hence why we dont have it)

03-26-2009, 09:06 AM	#2
Anhkhoa Join Date: Jan 2009 United States of America Posts: 704	Re: Aim to fire transistion "Gameplay issues" the 1337 no recoil quick aim = noob rambos

03-26-2009, 09:14 AM	#3
Rudd Retired PR Developer Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Location: England, Brighton Posts: 17,664 Blog Entries: 2	Re: Aim to fire transistion Nice videos (if it wasn't youtube it would be good to extract the sound ) but iirc the time for sighting in ingame is also portraying that ur eye must focus to the scope sight, which can't be portrayed any other way afaik. Though I wouldn't mind the scopes being sped up a little, but atm I'm very happy with the speed gameplay wise.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure." I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.

03-26-2009, 09:24 AM	#5
PR.IT Stek_WAR Join Date: Oct 2008 Italy Location: Pescara Posts: 61	Re: Aim to fire transistion what you say is already on this project reality: if you shoot right after you've targeted will notice that your shot will be very inaccurate! instead expect a couple of seconds you'll notice the difference in accuracy!
	My grandfather used to say: you were born in Italy and you will die in Italy To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

03-26-2009, 09:40 AM	#6
Psykogundam Join Date: Jan 2008 Ireland Posts: 2,839	Re: Aim to fire transistion i think your wrong. aimpoint takes about a second to scope and fire (and just like these guys, it mightnt be accurate, but once you get a shot off in the right direction, it counts just the same) , acog takes 1.5 - 3 seconds. and these guys seem to be using aimpoints. so post up soldiers using medium to long range scopes, who ARNT using the emergancy battle site on the top for a proper comparrison.
Psykogundam Join Date: Jan 2008 Ireland Posts: 2,839	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

03-26-2009, 10:33 AM	#8
Hitperson Retired Tournament Lead Join Date: Nov 2005 United Kingdom Location: Chippenham (ish) Posts: 6,950 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Aim to fire transistion things like EoTechs should be faster to aim though.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down" Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon." M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks" [R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."

03-26-2009, 10:37 AM	#9
nick20404 Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,755	Re: Aim to fire transistion This is mostly a problem in urban combat maps or close combat, if it could be changed it could stop things like both people diving to the ground 5 feet away from each other and opening up. Its kinda lame that you have a better chance of living like that. If you had a quick aim and a decent accuracy in close combat you wouldn't have to hop around like a idiot or dive on the ground, close engagements would end quickly and realistically, and longer range combat would not change much as I am not suggesting the guns be more accurate but be ready to fire effectively quicker. And you can never tell me you have not come around a corner ran into a full enemy squad and they all dive onto there belly's and light you up.
nick20404 Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,755

03-26-2009, 03:08 PM	#10
gazzthompson Join Date: Jan 2007 United Kingdom Location: norfolk Posts: 8,075	Re: Aim to fire transistion most of them videos they used red dots, which in game are fast to draw. in the last video he is using a ACOG, now im no expert on the matter but i highly doubt he is aiming down the sight, but drawing the weapon up and shooting "down the barrel" or what ever the technical term would be. which is best represented in game as hip firing because of the lack of shouldering the rifle but not looking down sighs (which i doubt is possible, hence why we dont have it)
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links