|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Guys, please dont go offtopic.
|
|
Ingame name: A.Behr
Xfire: arjan1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fryslan
Posts: 1,035
|
Insurgents rely on Hit and Run tactics, or should. Crawl in an immobile tank would not be logical at all imo.
|
|
If you can read this the bitch fell off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 877
|
What avout giving them an old soviet D30?
|
|
Live by the sword, die by the sword...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Ingame:G-LockCobra To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
you forget that there are some die hard insurgents out there, especially in afghanistan, ive read of mortor teams firing in afghanistan onto enemy soldiers, getting shot at by an apache 30mm and still kept firing until they were eliminated. make it so that the rounds in the tank are randomised, so between say 3-7 rounds(type maybe random too) random locations perhaps if u want to go that far. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Translator: "He's not a bad man.." Soldier: "He's not a bad man? he's got a BOMB strapped to him!" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() |
I like this idea..
Just i see the AT of all the Factions. UK: TOW USA: TOW Militia: Zis WW2 Cannon (Zis-3 Maybe) MEC: HJ8 (Or something like that) China: HJ8 Insurgents: N/A. So, why none? maybe for 2 reasons. Armed civilians doesnt have acces to Big AT Guns, they dont have time or command to prepare a basic defense of their place (So no Static AT would be deployed).. So, adding a wreck tank its not a bad idea, but we have to follow a little Story line Lets use Basrah, in 0.5, Basrah was some kind of MEC vs USA, USA Wins and MEC retreats, some of them, infiltrated on the civilian population, starts to teach Civilians about modern Warfare, or their warfare. Then, Revolution (This is the map in 0.5, the MEC vs USA its not reprensented in game) somehow, MEC Leaders succesfully camouflaged tanks on abandoned factorys. USA its pulled back from the city and the Insurgents are getting stronger. As you can see, USA wins again, some heavy Armour vehicles are left on the desert. Near the city, not far from the VC, theres an abandoned tank.. sings of the last battle. Now, one or 2 Surviving T55 - T54 or whatever are put into "Static Defense Service".. and there you got.. I think PR is not following any storyline.. no? |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() |
Quote:
Back on topic, I think that the abandoned tanks lying around are abandoned for a reason... Mainly because after a T55 is hit by an APFSDS round, there is not too much that is goint to be able to work. Not to mention all the seals and electronics that would be corroded or rusted etc, etc. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| broken, insurgency, tanks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|