|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
I even refuted that point in the edit and it still comes up... The spawn points would be FIXED. That is if you'd click on say spawn point #23 then it would be placed at the location decided by the developer of the particular map. | |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
not a bad way to go, but i'd rather test 0.85 way before i make any more comments. I guess it all depends on the organisation of the rebels...
|
|
Super mario brothers: Nothing beats reality like killing turtles while high on shrooms and flying with a cape
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 445
Location: Sofia
|
What if the commander puts all the caches let's say in the Palace where they cant be destroyed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
if i understand right, he can only put 1 (?) cache on 1 cachespawn, i beleive?
|
|
Super mario brothers: Nothing beats reality like killing turtles while high on shrooms and flying with a cape
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
have u taken into consideration that if the commander knows ALL the caches locations and decides them they can be disasterious for the team?
think about all that power in the hands of one tard and you can kiss that game sweet ol good bye. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Translator: "He's not a bad man.." Soldier: "He's not a bad man? he's got a BOMB strapped to him!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
What can stop them from placing it underwater, out of bounds, or on the isolated corners of the map, which is very frustrating for the other team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 148
|
Bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 689
Location: Ahol kúrt a farkú malac
|
Well the idea itself is not bad, however I have one problem with it:
the commander placing the caches before battle is illogical, because the caches were already in place before even the allied forces arrived, so it kinda feels wrong that the commander decides the caches locations just before the attack. It sounds more realistic that an insurgent force have to defend the already emplaced caches because the NATO force will invade in a short time. However if noone is bothered by this, then of course it is a good idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
Then comes the battle and everyone fight~ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| caches, commander, insurgency, option, place |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|