Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers - Page 2

Craz3y|Assasin · 10-04-2008, 12:06 PM

ok i like the idea but how can it be implented

Rudd · 10-04-2008, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tartantyco

-I think it would make FOP positions too predictable and also take away a lot of the strategy involved with FOP placement that you have now.

although I agree with the above statement, since it would basically be like vBF2 flag taking....

I would like a another kinda of FB, that can be spawned INSIDE a building easily

Perhaps a thing only the commander can give permission for, "designate temporary HQ" or somthing (little CoH I know...) but would 'turn off' after about 3minutes.

if the only way to easily get this inside a building is to spawn it similar to a rally point, then It can still work a least

QUESTION- we can spawn the RP object anywhere, but the FBs drop from the sky? why?

arjan · 10-04-2008, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd

if the only way to easily get this inside a building is to spawn it similar to a rally point, then It can still work a least

QUESTION- we can spawn the RP object anywhere, but the FBs drop from the sky? why?

Wye not just use a rally point?

Craz3y|Assasin · 10-04-2008, 01:03 PM

How bou't a small radio that deploys as a rally. You can place 2 razorwire and 2 sandbags with a SAW thats place on that little roadblock thingie so u can fire it out of a window.

Psykogundam · 10-04-2008, 01:10 PM

i suggested this idea before! maybe it was in the testers forum...blast!
You got my vote.

naykon · 10-04-2008, 02:07 PM

seems a good idea, but why not just put a rally in a building, or build a firebase next to it and put defences round the building to make it easier to defend? buildings can still be destroyed from the skies just like firebases can...

Valtasar · 10-04-2008, 04:44 PM

Great idea.
But I agree it can be too predictable. Need a lot of testing.

Sabre_tooth_tigger · 10-04-2008, 05:04 PM

Sounds nifty but we can allready often place the bunker structure inside a building. Shoveling the bunker is the delay to setup the radio comms and logistical structure

Scorch · 10-04-2008, 05:12 PM

I dont mean to hijack, but I thought I should post this.
Disclamer: Its just a random idea that popped into my head.

why couldnt we just have "secured" bulidings (buildings with a deployable radio inside) count towards the flag movement?
ex. The marines take 3 blocks of muttarah and the MEC have 2, causing the flag to move faster for the USMC.

Robbi · 10-04-2008, 06:35 PM

one of the best ideas ive heard for a while, nice one

10-04-2008, 12:06 PM	#11
Craz3y\|Assasin Join Date: Jun 2008 United States of America Location: Chicago Posts: 178	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers ok i like the idea but how can it be implented
	-Craz3y- To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (\__/) Smoke + Huey = FAIL To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (O.o ) (> < )This is bunny. Copy bunny into your siginature to help him on his way to world domination!

10-04-2008, 01:03 PM	#14
Craz3y\|Assasin Join Date: Jun 2008 United States of America Location: Chicago Posts: 178	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers How bou't a small radio that deploys as a rally. You can place 2 razorwire and 2 sandbags with a SAW thats place on that little roadblock thingie so u can fire it out of a window.
	-Craz3y- To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (\__/) Smoke + Huey = FAIL To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (O.o ) (> < )This is bunny. Copy bunny into your siginature to help him on his way to world domination!

10-04-2008, 01:10 PM	#15
Psykogundam Join Date: Jan 2008 Ireland Posts: 2,842	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers i suggested this idea before! maybe it was in the testers forum...blast! You got my vote.
Psykogundam Join Date: Jan 2008 Ireland Posts: 2,842	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-04-2008, 02:07 PM	#16
naykon Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 111	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers seems a good idea, but why not just put a rally in a building, or build a firebase next to it and put defences round the building to make it easier to defend? buildings can still be destroyed from the skies just like firebases can...
naykon Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 111

10-04-2008, 04:44 PM	#17
Valtasar Join Date: Jun 2006 Latvia Location: Riga Posts: 656	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers Great idea. But I agree it can be too predictable. Need a lot of testing.
	Sorry for my English To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-04-2008, 05:04 PM	#18
Sabre_tooth_tigger Join Date: Jun 2007 Mozambique Posts: 1,835	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers Sounds nifty but we can allready often place the bunker structure inside a building. Shoveling the bunker is the delay to setup the radio comms and logistical structure
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-04-2008, 05:12 PM	#19
Scorch Join Date: Dec 2007 United States of America Posts: 200	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers I dont mean to hijack, but I thought I should post this. Disclamer: Its just a random idea that popped into my head. why couldnt we just have "secured" bulidings (buildings with a deployable radio inside) count towards the flag movement? ex. The marines take 3 blocks of muttarah and the MEC have 2, causing the flag to move faster for the USMC.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Last edited by Scorch; 10-04-2008 at 05:24 PM..

10-04-2008, 06:35 PM	#20
Robbi Join Date: Jul 2008 Tuvalu Location: .l.. Posts: 4,484	Re: Taking buildings instead of bulding bunkers one of the best ideas ive heard for a while, nice one
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Dtacs you fool you have overloaded your douschbag reactor!!! Your at fucktard critical mass, NO DONT PUSH THAT BUTTON YOU RETARD!" dtacs - lol who said that? say dat 2 my face nerdking not online and see wat happens

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links