Get rid of exsisting APC's.

~~Pence~~ · 03-17-2006, 04:35 AM

When the full release comes apart from the Warrior, we should have tracked APC's instead of the exsisting tire drivern ones?

LAV's are just getting anoying weeling about like a gay. I was thinking along the lines of Bradley's and BMP's.

Anyone else think so?

Hitperson · 03-17-2006, 05:28 AM

i would love BRM's and BMP's but as far as i am aware the PLA don't uses them.

The MEC might do though (could do)

da.SPAWN · 03-17-2006, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pence

Anyone else think so?

No i like the (gay)wheeled APCs

Pantera · 03-17-2006, 09:43 AM

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL !!!

Peter-SAS · 03-17-2006, 09:45 AM

Bradley should replace the LAV

MonkeyNutz · 03-17-2006, 09:49 AM

I like that faster wheel based ones, also better for urban environments, well the road anyway :O)

~~Pence~~ · 03-17-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonkeyNutz

I like that faster wheel based ones, also better for urban environments, well the road anyway :O)

Faster APC's are a nusence to gameplay people think that they are fast enough to go ram a tank..

Quote:

weeling about like a gay.

[T]Terranova7 · 03-17-2006, 02:20 PM

Why would you get rid of them? They are real. Not to mention more maunverable. Bradley is not really designed for an APC vehicle, its an Infantry fighting vehicle, with a small crew compartment that carries 5 to 6 soldiers. If you want a tracked APC for the U.S, look no further than the AAAV seris. Although I think the wheeled APCs should remain on Urban maps since they are more prone to travel on roads rather than tracked vehicles.

For reference on the AAAV, go here.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...nd/aavp7a1.htm

JellyBelly · 03-17-2006, 03:04 PM

With only a .50 and a grenade launcher armament, maybe it would be possible to make the passengers have the ability to fire there weapons throught the hatches that can be opened above the passenger compartment.

~~Pence~~ · 03-17-2006, 04:55 PM

I am sick to death of weeled APC's, I have resined to useing just a shower now in fear of a f*cking weeling gay. It is a bit silly how there is no need for bridges wile APC's are around and floting weeling gay's are worse when the guy who is driveing, drives you into the water and then you have to evacuate only to find you cant go verry fast so you die...

Oh by the way this is not a question of TAKEING them out, i just dont want them to be as powerfull as the IFV's and i want to see everyone else'es view on them.

I also ask that the MEC/China/America/Russia(if introduced) need an IFV and especily i ask for BMP-3's.

03-17-2006, 04:35 AM	#1
~~Pence~~ Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,252 Location: Getting closer to America >_>	Get rid of exsisting APC's. When the full release comes apart from the Warrior, we should have tracked APC's instead of the exsisting tire drivern ones? LAV's are just getting anoying weeling about like a gay. I was thinking along the lines of Bradley's and BMP's. Anyone else think so?

03-17-2006, 05:28 AM	#2
Hitperson Retired Tournament Lead Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 6,808 United Kingdom Location: Chippenham (ish) Blog Entries: 1	i would love BRM's and BMP's but as far as i am aware the PLA don't uses them. The MEC might do though (could do)
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down" Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon." M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks" [R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."

03-17-2006, 09:43 AM	#4
Pantera Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,169 United Kingdom Location: London, UK	LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL !!!
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

03-17-2006, 09:45 AM	#5
Peter-SAS Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 371 Location: North London	Bradley should replace the LAV
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Ingame: Peter-SAS Class: Whatever the SL wants To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

03-17-2006, 09:49 AM	#6
MonkeyNutz Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 94	I like that faster wheel based ones, also better for urban environments, well the road anyway :O)
MonkeyNutz Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 94

03-17-2006, 02:20 PM	#8
[T]Terranova7 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,073	Why would you get rid of them? They are real. Not to mention more maunverable. Bradley is not really designed for an APC vehicle, its an Infantry fighting vehicle, with a small crew compartment that carries 5 to 6 soldiers. If you want a tracked APC for the U.S, look no further than the AAAV seris. Although I think the wheeled APCs should remain on Urban maps since they are more prone to travel on roads rather than tracked vehicles. For reference on the AAAV, go here. http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...nd/aavp7a1.htm
[T]Terranova7 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,073

03-17-2006, 03:04 PM	#9
JellyBelly Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,310 Location: The United States of England	With only a .50 and a grenade launcher armament, maybe it would be possible to make the passengers have the ability to fire there weapons throught the hatches that can be opened above the passenger compartment.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [RGG] - Pte.Phillips - *To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.* - Arma ftw Really Gay Guy America was a tad late into the First World War. They redeemed themself's and came in slightly sooner in the Second. Now they seem determined to start the Third.

03-17-2006, 04:55 PM	#10
~~Pence~~ Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,252 Location: Getting closer to America >_>	I am sick to death of weeled APC's, I have resined to useing just a shower now in fear of a f*cking weeling gay. It is a bit silly how there is no need for bridges wile APC's are around and floting weeling gay's are worse when the guy who is driveing, drives you into the water and then you have to evacuate only to find you cant go verry fast so you die... Oh by the way this is not a question of TAKEING them out, i just dont want them to be as powerfull as the IFV's and i want to see everyone else'es view on them. I also ask that the MEC/China/America/Russia(if introduced) need an IFV and especily i ask for BMP-3's.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links