|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
hi all again i'd like to take discussion to a tank that should be in.
the T-54 ![]() this tank is very common and the soviets DID make around 90.000 of them so they could appear in this mod, btw it's still being used even today by some armies. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Moderator & Tester
![]() |
I wouldnt think it a necessary suggestion, as insurgents dont have access to MBTs, nor do they fit in with their tactical doctrine.
The militia already have the T-72, so they dont really need this. ...mongol... |
|
"A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it is not open." - Frank Zappa
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. CareBear- you on about the poet Mongol? greatest poet iv ever known in my life <3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
The last thing we need is the super insurgents with a tank. The unorganized stay-at-main-base brits wouldnt be there because they are idiots, they just couldn't leave the main base.
I can imagine it now on Al Basrah, insurgent tank sitting out of the main on a hill *landy drives out* *boom!* *apc drives out* *BOOM!*...be impossible to leave the base. |
|
Mad-Mike - Good photo's but why do u have 2 threads that are the same?
[R-CON]ReadMenace - Are you referring to the obvious double-post or the less obvious, high-resolution military photographs thread? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
Quote:
But I see your point. Insurgents shouldn't have any heavy assts at all. A couple of these in the Militia inventory wouldn't hurt anytone, though. After all it's the most common and widely used tank in the world - the AK47 of tanks, so to say. Thing is that it's not that different from the T-62 that's already ingame. Would be kinda pointless to implement it, really. | |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 814
|
Well, Taliban did have tanks in the beginning of Enduring Freedom. Airforce Special Ops destroyed most of them with the help of the Northern Alliance, but Taliban had a fair amount of BMPs and tanks for a while there.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Informally retired modder - Projects: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ,PSC Faction |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
Giving insurgents tanks and BMPs would still ruin the kind of guerilla warfare that they should stick to in PR, making them more of a poorly equiped regular army rather than a unique partisan faction.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Lead Beta Tester - EU
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London - UK
Posts: 1,213
|
Quote:
The insurgency in PR are more of an unorganised rabble with AKs, which makes giving them a tank a little bit strange in my opinion. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]Eggman - At one point it said Realtitty which I think was a Freudian... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| insurgent or milita, light, medium, tank |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|