|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 814
|
That's true about Taliban not being so much Insurgents, and more like a Militia, but the Insurgent team is used in place of the Taliban on Korengal so...
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Informally retired modder - Projects: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ,PSC Faction |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
i've completetly left the idea with giving heavy tank suggs for Guerilla factions since this would simply ruin their doctrines and gameplay.
![]() here is something i know guerillas would use (light and medium tanks are the most likely to be used by Milita Insurgents if any is to be used) that's a pic of a T34-85 below is a picture of a T34-76(notice the swastika is not bent like the nazi wich indicates this early T34 was captured and used by the Finnish Army in the Finnish Winter War and/or in the continuation wars) their difference is turret design and heavier armour for the 85's turret and main gun calibre the 85 has additional gastanks on the back and tracks on the frontal armour as a sort of extra armour and to repair eventual tracks being damaged this is proparbly a modification by the tanks own crew( the T34-76 used a 76.2mm F-34 L/30.5 gun Zis-5 tank gun and the 85 version used a 85mm ZIS S-53 tank gun) both tanks were made in vast numbers during and even some time after the war the 76.2mm came into production in 1940 and was produced even after the war, the 85mm version began production in 1943 but in larger scale on 1944 til the end and some time after the war it's estimated that some 85.000 tanks were built of both versions combined these tanks are still in use by some armies in today these tanks can kill still engage most armour and even(with severe difficulty) MBTs if you target critical areas but head to head they are generally outclassed. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Semper fidelis Semper Occultus Scientia Vis Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
Last edited by zordja; 11-10-2009 at 08:03 AM..
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 475
|
I´ve never heard of any of those wwII tanks being used by Iraqi insurgents or taliban. Niether group appears to have control over any tanks today, and if they did it would be old soviet cold war equipment like the t-62.
I would love to see WWII tanks go up against modern equipment though, I wonder if a tiger could penetrate an Abrahms in the back or side... But it shouldnt be in PR, it wouldnt fit with the realism approach. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
the insurgents did have a tank in PR, back in versions .4 and .5 on al basrah. back when basrah was USMC vs Insurgents. The insurgents had 1 desert camo t-62 and only the "mechanic" kit could drive it. While I think the notion of insurgents having tanks is a little silly, the way PR implemented it on .5 basrah seemed the most realistic way possible. iraq had alot of abandoned armor after the US invasion, and the insurgents probably had atleast some members who were mechanically inclined {like car mechanics and former iraqi army armor crewmen/mechanics} so i didnt think the tank was too far fetched. there was quite a few times my squad was pinned down by the insurgent t62 and we were furiously typing in team chat for our abrams to come save us.
|
|
known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
' To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
would be higly unlikely for insurgents or Milita or even talibans to actually acquire a tiger tank since they're kinda only a few still in working order being found and the 88mm rounds are not being made for it so it's kinda more of a dream wish than a reality but well as you say a tiger might be able to do a hole in a Abrams with a very good placed shot
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Semper fidelis Semper Occultus Scientia Vis Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
i got another suggestion a light tank wich might be a reality
The Soviet Amphibious Light tank PT-76 it's got fairly good armour and not a too bad gun and it can swim. but cause it's an amphibian tank it's armor really lets it down so it's only good for surprise attacks, Heavy Recon, Ambushes and river patrol as a temporary PBR her's some facts about itType Amphibious Light Tank Place of origin Soviet Union Service history In service 16 August 1952–present Production history Designer N. Shashmurin and Zh.Y. Kotin Designed 1949–51 Manufacturer VTZ, Kirov Factory Produced 1953–69 Number built Around 12,000[1] Specifications (PT-76 model 1) Weight 14.6 tonnes Length 6.91 m (hull) Width 3.15 m Height 2.325 m Crew 3 (driver, commander, loader) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Armour 20 mm as you see it's not like an overlord tank with god armour Primary armament 76,2 mm D-56T rifled tank gun (40 rds.) Secondary armament 7.62 mm SGMT coax machine gun (1,000 rds.) Engine 6-cyl. diesel 240 hp (179 kW) Power/weight 16.4 hp/tonne Suspension torsion-bar Ground clearance 370 mm Fuel capacity 250 l Operational range 370–400 km, 480–510 km with external fuel Speed 44 km/h (27 mph), 10.2 km/h (6.3 mph) swimming ![]() this is the waterjets one covered by the protection plates that makes the Propulsionary thrust for the PT-76 on the water. this tank was used in the cold war and is still being used today. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Semper fidelis Semper Occultus Scientia Vis Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Forum Moderator
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7,402
|
Quote:
Anyway, insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan don't use tanks. Show some evidence that they have been employed in the last few years if you're that desperate to get them in. The only unconventional factions I see using a tank are the malitia (who've already got thier good old T-62s) and the African Resistance Fighters (who are already lined up to get the T-62) | |
|
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. El_Vikingo: Bob_Marley, the level 70 pimp, will satisfy your needs. Origin/Battlelog ID: RMODBobMarley |
||
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() |
I'd like to see your source on Iraqi Insurgents and the Taliban having active armor assets.
I can tell you now that there will be very little, I read somewhere that the Taliban have captured soviet equipment, but not the knowledge nor ammunition or mechanical ability to get them on their feet. There has to be replacement parts and a supply chain in place for a vehicle to stay up and running, and im sure that the insurgents are going to have a lot of trouble getting those parts through sources out of Iraq. And where on earth could they hide a tank? I can tell you now unless a map is made which was based around 2003-ish then its not going to happen. |
|
Sheath no sword;
Lower no shield; Lack no vigilance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 46
|
hmm i know of 1 AA that the Insurgent, Milita or the Talibans could have
the ZSU-57-2(it uses 2 57mm guns) is one that they might use, here is a pic of it 2 ![]() old M3 Halftracks reconfigured for AA use can be still seen in IDF US Army and a few other armies her's a few pics of it ![]()
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Semper fidelis Semper Occultus Scientia Vis Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() |
Quote:
The devs are not going to put something into PR without a valid source providing that the faction is still using that equipment. Its like saying 'The Taliban need F-15's. Why? Because they need them to balance things out' | |
|
Sheath no sword;
Lower no shield; Lack no vigilance. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| insurgent or milita, light, medium, tank |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|