|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 3,046
|
Currently, the Intel points acquired by killing/processing/capturing insurgents continues regardless of the state of the currently visible caches; even if all 3 current ones are visible, the coalition still gain IP. This means that if the INS. are doing particularly well and are defending their caches (taking lots of deaths but not letting the Coalition near), the Coalition are gradually stacking up the IP. When they finally do destroy a cache, due to the IP accumilated during the fighting the new cache is immediately visible to them.
This is a *big* disadvantage to the Insurgents, who rely on being in well dug in defensive positions before the enemy arrive and who also tend to have less in the way of fast transport (they may have cars, but a heli's faster). If possible, IP should be frozen when all 3 current caches are located, thus giving the Insurgent team time to set up their defences before the Coalition discover the cache and roll in. It's also a bit more realistic, since the Coalition wouldn't have intel on a cache location the instant it is created and the insurgents would know where it is first. If Rudd's suggestion isn't used, this should be. |
|
The original gun freak gaymer geek
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Server Licensing/PR:ArmA2 Testing Manager
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 3,187
|
Good idea I reckon, but I prefer Ruud's idea of spawning all caches together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 417
|
Ditto on epochs comment really from me, very good idea if Rudds one doesn't get though
|
|
Lots of love
Vilhelm xx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
I used to like it when all the caches were spawned at the start of the round too, but it was too easy for the Brits to find them, whilst the insurgents defended the the ones they had intel on.
Harrod's idea is good, halt the intel build up otherwise you get US/UK squads moving and taking out the new intel before the Insurgents even have time to realise its popped up. Happens on Ramiel all the time. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Follow me on Twitter! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
Agree with this suggestion
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure." I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| caches, coalition, freeze, gain, visible |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|