|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yooooorkshire!
Posts: 2,136
|
I thought he just meant the ones he viewed we're unrealistic, not that all Fords are unrealistic, and that any contention that they were realistic, and any evidence for this realism, would be treated as a global conspiracy
Anyway, anyone who's played Company of Heroes will know what kind of horrendous stalemates, and generally naff games bridges and their destruction can cause. There's always a way of crossing a river via a Ford or two on CoH despite this, but it still makes for some terrible games. Obviously PR is very different to CoH in lots of ways, but I think the same stalemates would occur to some degree if there wasn't a secure place to cross a river all the time. Very evident on Fools Road when the bridge goes down, can be devastating, and while I think that's a good thing in the context of that map, I don't think it would work out on alot of others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 720
|
Why should the fighting focus entirely around the cap areas, etc.? What's wrong with seeing hard fighting around the bridges on (for example) Qwai? The game is not all about securing cap areas, but also about the means to get there.
Removing the land bridge on Qwai would require more teamwork and coordination from both teams, and what's wrong with that? You will not only have to beat the hell out of government office, but also make sure someone is guarding the bridge so that the armour can cross. The obvious advantage the Chinese have with their tanks should be countered by removing the land bridges. The battle will then be both more dynamic and interesting, but probably closer to how it would've turned out IRL as well (much focus on holding the bridges). Btw, I don't think the land bridges shall be removed from Basrah or OGT. Just talking about Qwai. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think the biggest thing about all of them is that they are just kind of... well, there. They're not expansive or shaped like they would be, they are often shaped to a rectangle. Some dips and dives in certain land bridges would be interesting, just to see some spots of the water-bridge either needing to be avoided or just another bump on the road to your destination. I would absolutely love to see Qwai's magic riverbed removed. I remembered times before the landbridge was well known that teams in littlebirds would frequently take explosives to the bridges to quickly drop explosives and move out of the area, effectively keeping all heavy armor siphoned to one bridge, with APCs guarding the bridge to allow hummvees and etc to cross while they tried to fend off vehicles and armor during non-traffic times. On OGT, I would like to see the riverbed expanded, and very varied with dips in the water as well as a few rises, if possible. It should be somewhat trecherous, but large enough to see a few areas of it easily used. Basrah needs to lose some of it's water bridges. Just a few; the swamp area is nice, and I'd like to see some swamp-river connections to the land bridges so that you would actually drive through some swampland to get to the river crossings, which would partially inherit swamp-esque shape. The silly little 3ft wide perfectly grid-like bridge near the double-sided bridge should be removed. It's silly, and the bridges BUILT for transportation between the north and south is almost useless since it's always either blown up or ignored. Not to knock on any of the DEVs or mapmakers, as it is a trend that was started, and continued; it's just a matter that makes certain areas of the map more aesthetic than useful to an assault. | |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
|
You could implement the new ideas of cave ins and landslides and make the land bridges "destructable" and give them the ability to be "repaired" with shovels.
Sorry if this has already been suggested. Couldn't be bothered to read the whole thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure." I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,017
|
Usually, when looking back on the history of humankind, land brides were there first; then came roads and vehicles, as people realize that they can cross the river at location in question. So those land bridges used to be the only places people could cross the river long before more sophisticated means were invented or build. For me it is perfectly normal that we have land briges or fords on maps with rivers. They might have lead to an abandoned village or outskirts of a bigger city.
But what i would like to see is much deeper fords, so that only some of the vehicles could cross them - like those designed for military or offroad use - and even they could only crawl slowly due to water resistance. |
|
|
Last edited by clueless_noob; 08-26-2008 at 06:04 AM..
|
|
|
#47 | ||
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yooooorkshire!
Posts: 2,136
|
Quote:
Quote:
Don't really know anything about it, but from playing BF2 and various mods for 3 years or so, maybe more, it's seems like a fairly simplistic system. Would be great to see Tanks be able to go trawl through the water up to their turret, while a Hummer floats about because it's not heavy enough to grip on the river bed enough to go anywhere. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bridge, bridges, land, landbridge, landbridges, removal, river, unrealistic |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|