|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 18
|
Would be cool to see USMC using M40A3's on sniper kits, and m25's on marksman. Similarly - M24/A3 (.338 Lapua version) and an SPR for Army marksmen.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
PR Operations Management
![]() |
Other way around mate. The marines use SPR's mostly for their DMR. Army uses M14's and M14EBR's. We actually already have the M40A3 for the USMC and the M24 will be coming back in for the Army. For 0.8 both will use the M14 we have but Katarn has told me that he plans on heavily pimping up his M16A4 model to create a proper SPR for the marines.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 209
|
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the DMR for the US Army now the M110 and not the M14? I know the M14 is out there still, and personally I love it, hard to beat a true .30 cal battle rifle, but it's already being replaced. If I have my facts correct one of the big reasons for the change was the Army wanting a 7.62 NATO firing semi-auto sniper that could be used with a suppressor effectively, and while the M14 is a marvelous rifle it does have problems when employing a suppressor. Also the direct gas system on the M110 is designed to cause less felt recoil, and longer bolt life. Anyway all that said...I do believe that a new DMR is in order for the Army not just the USMC.
|
|
|
Last edited by ostupidman; 06-27-2008 at 04:38 AM..
Reason: It's late and I can't type
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Moderator
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kristiansand
Posts: 7,866
|
AFAIK, the M14 is much more common.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Asking you to push his girlfriend down the stairs. Well, thats just not on. Tell him to man up and if he wants an abortion done on the cheap he'll have to do it himself. -[R-MOD]Bob_Marley |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 18
|
Umm... Since when does the marine corp use the ARMY/NAVY Special Purpose Rifle
Marine Corp - Squad Advanced Marksman Rifle: SAM-R http://www.dogfightink.com/ASM.jpg M25 - http://www.dogfightink.com/dmr.jpg ARMY - Army Special Purpose Rifle: SPR http://www.dogfightink.com/SPR.jpg Wikipedia it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Ma...Marksman_Rifle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_..._Purpose_Rifle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Ma...Marksman_Rifle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M21_Sni...pon_System#M25 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...Marksman_Rifle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M110_Se..._Sniper_System http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR-25 |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
i thought the marines were using the M14 more than those newer rifles
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
PR Operations Management
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana/Massachussetts
Posts: 3,277
|
I believe II MEF had an emergency request for them.
I know the 82nd used some M110s in Afghanistan. Not sure if the 101st is now. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Glassboro NJ
Posts: 2,395
|
THis is set in the future, thus the M110 deserves being placed in, though without the supressor cause that would give gameplay headaches like crazy!!!
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Biggest time killer :P To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| separation, sniper, usarmy, usmc |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|