project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Suggestions
03 Sep 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2008, 10:39 PM   #1
EOD_Security-2252

EOD_Security-2252's Avatar
Default New stuff with the US Army, etc.

First off, I just want to say in response to the CROWS thread below that the all the factions can have their nice, safe inside-controlled turrets, but the USMC should not. This is because, and it's been true all along, the Marine Corps doesn't get new stuff. Marines will probably continue to have outside turret gunners for sometime to come, just like they still have hueys and Sea Kings when Blackhawks are a superior platform.
Also, does anyone else think that when they add the US Army there should be a requestable Airborne kit?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Informally retired modder - Projects:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,PSC Faction
EOD_Security-2252 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 11:26 PM   #2
[R-DEV]Rudd
PR:BF2 Developer
Supporting Member

[R-DEV]Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

on the airbourne front there was a detailed discussion a while ago http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f66-...ight=airbourne

And I agree on the CROWS front since AFAIK the open turret, perhaps with a gunner protection kit, is more common?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[R-DEV]Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 04:07 AM   #3
Maxfragg

Maxfragg's Avatar
Send a message via ICQ to Maxfragg Send a message via MSN to Maxfragg Send a message via Skype™ to Maxfragg
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

the point is, that on some maps the crows would now actually balance it, when the have the new Vodnik and the chinise VN3

http://maxfragg.blogspot.com
Maxfragg is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 05:50 AM   #4
LtSoucy
Supporting Member

LtSoucy's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

The Marines do get new stuff, just it would really unbalance the game and till other factions recive theres it wont come in.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




LtSoucy is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 08:43 AM   #5
EOD_Security-2252

EOD_Security-2252's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

I'm not saying CROWS is a bad idea, it's a good idea and giving all other factions CROWS-like stuff is ok too, but please list some examples where USMC actually gets new stuff (in real life, not in PR). Even the EFV, they were looking at getting it etc, but they never really got it to replace the AAV.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Informally retired modder - Projects:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,PSC Faction
EOD_Security-2252 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 10:01 AM   #6
Garmax

Garmax's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

The M16A4 newly designed weapon. given to the USMC.
Garmax is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 10:04 AM   #7
Hotrod525

Hotrod525's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Hotrod525
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EOD_Security-2252 View Post
First off, I just want to say in response to the CROWS thread below that the all the factions can have their nice, safe inside-controlled turrets, but the USMC should not. This is because, and it's been true all along, the Marine Corps doesn't get new stuff. Marines will probably continue to have outside turret gunners for sometime to come, just like they still have hueys and Sea Kings when Blackhawks are a superior platform.
Also, does anyone else think that when they add the US Army there should be a requestable Airborne kit?

The new Huey helicopter is entering service,new cobra entering service both totaly new advanced version, they got EFV, AAAV, new F35 JSF, M16A4, MARPAT, Marines gets new stuff And Marines dont use SeaKings only the navy and AIRBORNE KIT have been suggested 15 000 000 times or more so, use search next time.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Hotrod525 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 10:42 AM   #8
M.Warren

M.Warren's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

Well in all honesty, for the use of the HMMWV CROWS system and the M1126 Stryker it should be in the hands of the U.S. Army. At the same time, the most practical use of these light vehicles with remote gun controlled systems should really be on an Insurgent map with U.S. Army forces. But there really isn't any maps that fit that description at this time to the best of my knowledge.

Not to be a pain but the M1126 Stryker is useless on all major front line engagements against a well equipped army. Such as the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) and the Middle Eastern Coalition (MEC). Don't belive me? Think about it, how often do you see an LAV-25 Pirana or a BTR-90 sitting back at main base on Kashan Desert because no one wants to use it? It's not surprising. And in actuality, they're better off than a Stryker.

In Project Reality a single Tank shell, Heavy Anti-Tank missle, or 2 Light Anti-Tank rockets will most likely destroy these things. It's just the way it is. So there really isn't anything spectacular about these vehicles. Hopefully they're atleast amphibious as they should be.

YouTube Video

To the best of my knowledge, the only Stryker varient the U.S. Army forces will have is the remotely mounted .50 caliber machine gun. But it takes several different varients to work together as a team. Maybe if we could get varients of these craft in an attempt to simulate a coordinated mechanized squad it'll be useful.

I doubt we'll ever see the Mobile Gun System (MGS) varient. However the Fire Support Vehicle (FSV) with the mortar may be possible.

Take the Blue Pill or take the Red Pill?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
M.Warren is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 11:39 AM   #9
Hotrod525

Hotrod525's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Hotrod525
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

Yeah U.S. Army is pretty advanced...but we cannot put this in PR cause "Thing have to been balanced" and most of those system will not work well ingame.And i think rely to much on technologie is a disadvantage on its own... what happen in a nuclear conflict ? or just EMP over battlefield ? all you're stuff is down.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Hotrod525 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:20 PM   #10
gazzthompson

gazzthompson's Avatar
Default Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrod525 View Post
Yeah U.S. Army is pretty advanced...but we cannot put this in PR cause "Thing have to been balanced" and most of those system will not work well ingame.And i think rely to much on technologie is a disadvantage on its own... what happen in a nuclear conflict ? or just EMP over battlefield ? all you're stuff is down.
US army is no more advanced than alot of conventional armys tbh


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gazzthompson is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
army, stuff
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.