|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Moderator
![]() |
I dont think AAVs should be dual operated.
It'd take too many players from the battle, ontop of the already large amount of players taken from infantry units, on combined arms maps. You could argue do the same with all the other armour, then but i dont think AAVs, in most aspects, fill they're roll well enough and/or as closely to as RL as they should. I don understand it's hard to implement them properly, with the whole balance issue and all. ...mongol... |
|
Don't hate da mod, hate da game.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. CareBear- you on about the poet Mongol? greatest poet iv ever known in my life <3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,050
Location: Vancouver
|
I think the balance issue of having a vehicle like that is that usually you'd try and take down those things before sending in the BHs. Infantry or CAS takes those suckers down and then the rest move in.
Careless or lack of leadership though seems to lead to situations where people think something is imbalanced. Yea, its your planning thats unbalanced. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [PR]NATO|P*Funk To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Tip of the Week: "Let someone else take point" -Cossack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| aav, seat |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|