|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
Comes back to the best solution is probably one that involves two elements to the bunker and firebase:
The main body - the sandbags and cammo netting for the FB, the sandbag walls and wooden base for the Bunker A team-level rallypoint - either spawned automatically inside the B/FB after a short period of time, or SL/Commander placed within a very small distance of a B/FB. Attacking sides would be able to kill the rallypoint with a knife, leaving the main body of the B/FB up until an engineer could get to it to destroy it outright. The ability to request heavy kits would remain linked to the structure itself, as would the ammo store - meaning that if attackers failed to remove a B/FB and the defenders were able to recapture it, they could still utilise this important aspect. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "That's how it starts, Mas, with that warm happy feeling inside. Pretty soon you're rocking in the corner, a full grown dog addict, wondering where your next St Bernand is coming from..." - IAJTHOMAS "Did they say what he's angry about?" asked Annette Mitchell, 77, of the district, stranded after seeing a double feature of "Piranha 3D" and "The Last Exorcism." - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,536
Location: Cambridge
|
I think thats a bit better, maybee the HP of the bunker could be increased to make it a place you can really defend from, too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,125
Location: Yooooorkshire!
|
Yeah I reckon if the defendabilty is increased there wouldn't be a problem, personally though I'd like to see less of the things in game in general and more transport.
I'd much prefer to have 1 bunker per side which can be heavily defended with AA, TOWs and MGs then loads of the things causing this if you ask me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() |
I don't like the idea of removing bunkers. However, what could possibly be done to prevent eternal seiges is to limit a bunkers spawn ability. If bunkers can spawn a max of size men, and takes a two minutes to recharge each slot a squad sized group can spawn only once every 12 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,125
Location: Yooooorkshire!
|
Yeah that's a reasonable idea, 12 minutes is a little excessive if you ask me but summet along those lines might be good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,073
|
Quote:
If you ask me, I'd like to see a system where players can only spawn on back flags (CPs not within the current AAS group). | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Member of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,886
Location: Quang Tri Province
|
Quote:
To keep the CP defended, there would need to be a supply chain as discussed... A couple trucks full of soldiers and a supply crate or two seems quite realistic. If these trucks were destroyed, the supply chain would be broken and the defending team would need to find another way to reinforce or supply the CP. Defenders would be at a disadvantage in some situations IRLIMO. | |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Location: NY
|
I honestly dont know what the big problem is for most of you.
If you're in a squad, and you encounter a CO asset... 1. Hide. Inform everyone 2. See if anyone has explosives or AT 3. Go to rally or nearest point to get AT or explosives. 4. Blow it up and run. If you fail, try again, but ask for tank or APC support. Communication brings down Bunkers more often than zerging. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
![]() |
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Former [DM] captain. The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Moderator
![]() |
I think the removal of Bunkers is one of the most regressive suggestions to date!
...mongol... |
|
Don't hate da mod, hate da game.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. CareBear- you on about the poet Mongol? greatest poet iv ever known in my life <3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bunkers, remove |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|