Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 Suggestions
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

View Poll Results: Should these multirole jets have more payload?
Yes, what you said 21 30.88%
Yes, but with altered payload 14 20.59%
Maybe 10 14.71%
No 23 33.82%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2008, 01:16 PM   #21

ralfidude's Avatar
Send a message via AIM to ralfidude
Default

well the thing is that its easy to land a eurofighter to rearm. But when it comes down to the j10s, as far as im concerned, when they take off, they never return alive. Yes, they do try to land... but no they are never sucessfull, including myself. I touched down on the runway, but the speed is always way too fast before i would crash at the other end, and if i go any slower than that, i always end up face first at the fence... more bombs on the j10 would be a tad bit more effective, but i do see what the guys are talking about with the balance here. So i agree to leave it as it is... but for gods sake fix the j10, lol, OR the runway.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ralfidude is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 01:32 PM   #22
Supporting Member

turnpipe's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ralfidude View Post
well the thing is that its easy to land a eurofighter to rearm. But when it comes down to the j10s, as far as im concerned, when they take off, they never return alive. Yes, they do try to land... but no they are never sucessfull, including myself. I touched down on the runway, but the speed is always way too fast before i would crash at the other end, and if i go any slower than that, i always end up face first at the fence... more bombs on the j10 would be a tad bit more effective, but i do see what the guys are talking about with the balance here. So i agree to leave it as it is... but for gods sake fix the j10, lol, OR the runway.
They are going to fix the j10, I think. I must say the physics on it are a work of art and chock full of challenge accompanied by the gauntlet of a runway. I have been practicing for months and can never get quite comfortable landing it.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
turnpipe is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 02:24 PM   #23

Sabre_tooth_tigger's Avatar
Default

Ages ago I read a suggestion about tree clearance next to the runway, I think its been noted anyhow


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sabre_tooth_tigger is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 03:46 PM   #24
Registered User

CAS_117's Avatar
Default

Well... The jets do have unlimited fuel. So I am not sure about increasing the loadout much. I've outfitted the F-16 with GBU-12's and AGM-65 Mavericks. Don't see any real issues with the F-16 having bombs, cept that the MiG-29 doesn't really use as many laser guided bombs as opposed to missiles; the Kh-29 looks much sexier than the say LT-2. I think having them with AGM-65's and Kh-29's would be best, but it doesn't change the game too much.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"The creator's concern is the conquest of nature. The parasite's concern is the conquest of men."
Howard Roark - "The Fountainhead" (1949)
CAS_117 is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 04:45 PM   #25

Viper5's Avatar
Default

More weight = less maneuverability. They dont load these things to the max. Think about it. If a soldier had to, he could prolly carry thousands of roudns of ammo. But he doesnt. Why? Becuause it would slow him down.

IMO Fighters (Eurofighter, J10, Mig29, F16, F1 should have:
4x Long Range AA Missiles
1x JDAM

Fighter-Bombers- (Gr.9, AV-8B, F15, not sure on PLA/MEC equivalents) should have:
2x Short Range
2x Long Range
2x Mavericks or rocket pods
1x JDAM

Bombers-SU25, Tornado, A10, whatever the hell that ugly ass PLA thing is, SU25
2x JDAM
Rockets
4x Maverick

War is America's way of teaching geography.


Superior thinking has always overcome superior force.
Viper5 is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 04:46 PM   #26
Gameserver Moderator

Jonny's Avatar
Default

The fuel is actually limited to four hours worth, you cant claim more because of the max time.

XKCD forums, in the middle of a perfectly sane conversation:
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Best post ever made!

EG: PPSh is made of win and quite possibly stamped sheet metal
Jonny is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 06:08 PM   #27
PR Mapper Team

[R-DEV]Rhino's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to [R-DEV]Rhino
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper5 View Post
Fighter-Bombers- (Gr.9, AV-8B, F15, not sure on PLA/MEC equivalents) should have:
2x Short Range
2x Long Range
2x Mavericks or rocket pods
1x JDAM

Bombers-SU25, Tornado, A10, whatever the hell that ugly ass PLA thing is, SU25
2x JDAM
Rockets
4x Maverick
lolz...

a harrier GR9 / II are not a fighter bombers...

the Tornado is not a bomber and the A-10 and Su-25 are also not bombers...

The Tornado GR4, F-15, SU-34 and SU-30mkk are all fighter bombers.

The Harrier GR9 / II, A-10, Su-25 are all Attack Jets.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[R-DEV]Rhino is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 06:15 PM   #28
Banned
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]CAS_117 View Post
Well... The jets do have unlimited fuel. So I am not sure about increasing the loadout much. I've outfitted the F-16 with GBU-12's and AGM-65 Mavericks. Don't see any real issues with the F-16 having bombs, cept that the MiG-29 doesn't really use as many laser guided bombs as opposed to missiles; the Kh-29 looks much sexier than the say LT-2. I think having them with AGM-65's and Kh-29's would be best, but it doesn't change the game too much.
Eyy! Congratz with the promotion
Waaah_Wah is offline
Old 05-03-2008, 06:16 PM   #29

Viper5's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Rhino View Post
lolz...

a harrier GR9 / II are not a fighter bombers...

the Tornado is not a bomber and the A-10 and Su-25 are also not bombers...

The Tornado GR4, F-15, SU-34 and SU-30mkk are all fighter bombers.

The Harrier GR9 / II, A-10, Su-25 are all Attack Jets.
meh, everyone understood the point. Im guessing you'd class the F117 as a bomber :P

War is America's way of teaching geography.


Superior thinking has always overcome superior force.
Viper5 is offline
Last edited by Viper5; 05-03-2008 at 06:31 PM..
Old 05-03-2008, 06:33 PM   #30
PR Mapper Team

[R-DEV]Rhino's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to [R-DEV]Rhino
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper5 View Post
meh, everyone understood the point. Im guessing you'd class the F117 as a bomber :P
yes thats cos the F117 is a bomber, and so is the B2


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[R-DEV]Rhino is offline
Closed Thread


Tags
ef2000, j10, loadouts, weapon
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2010, Project Reality.