SU-39, new spin on a middle aged idea!

[=TC=]nuetron · 10-22-2007, 07:25 PM

As i said there was an old post about the SU-39be sure to look at all pix http://www.realitymod.com/forum/su-3....html?p=507926
but now i have a few different ideas:

-1) keep the SU25 in-game and put the SU39"sniper" in the empty hangar
(with of course another A10 in the USMC side)
-2) replace rocket pods with gunpods(refer to picture of blue "sniper")
serving as AT/AP weapons
-3) replace 2 dumb-bombs with bomblette pods: containing 200
bomblettes(50 bomblettes per drop) used as the MEC cluster bomb(AT/AP)
-4) slightly improving the cannoon from the SU25

-5) improving the Laser guided missiles(such as the BIG missiles on the green camo "sniper" so that 1 laser guided missile kills a tank(not nearly kill it and injur it badly, also improve the USMC LGMs slightly)

BetterDeadThanRed · 10-22-2007, 07:29 PM

The last thing we need is 3 CAS aircraft per side, but I do support removing one froggy in favor of the Su-39, although I doubt we will ever see this thing ingame.

ryan d ale · 10-22-2007, 07:55 PM

I don't care I've never flown a jet in PR lol

Sounds good though - except 3 fixed wing aircraft per side.

AnRK · 10-24-2007, 01:05 PM

Well as far as I'm aware the 25 is a little outdated compared to the 39 is it not? Doesn't seem to fit in with the MECs relatively decent quality equipment to me.

Doc_Frank · 10-24-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnRK

Well as far as I'm aware the 25 is a little outdated compared to the 39 is it not? Doesn't seem to fit in with the MECs relatively decent quality equipment to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Su-25 -> explains a lot of things

AnRK · 10-24-2007, 03:29 PM

Well from what I've read the 1st version of the 25T is extremely unpopular with pilots and not particularly effective. An army that can afford Mig29s should have a decent Anti-Tank aircraft.

Doc_Frank · 10-24-2007, 03:47 PM

And the PPSh-41 submachine gun has a liability to jam, but that doesn't happen in PR (hardcoded?).

But
1) The SU-25 is still the basic aircraft of the Russian Airforce (the model is about as old as the F-16, F-18 )
2) The TM version is actually the SU-39.

Warmagi · 10-24-2007, 04:00 PM

someone said it before that jamming is hardcoded. About the planes... dont care to much...

AnRK · 10-24-2007, 05:06 PM

I know it's technically the Su39 but it's been upgraded from the 25T (although manages to look nowt like it). If an Su39 is ever made it should be given to the MEC though cos it creates a preeeety big gap in the quality of their equipment.

[R-DEV]77SiCaRiO77 · 10-24-2007, 05:56 PM

Su39 is already maded , look at the armored fury boosterpack , it just need a reskin .

10-22-2007, 07:25 PM	#1
[=TC=]nuetron Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: in your fears Posts: 358	SU-39, new spin on a middle aged idea! As i said there was an old post about the SU-39be sure to look at all pix http://www.realitymod.com/forum/su-3....html?p=507926 but now i have a few different ideas: -1) keep the SU25 in-game and put the SU39"sniper" in the empty hangar (with of course another A10 in the USMC side) -2) replace rocket pods with gunpods(refer to picture of blue "sniper") serving as AT/AP weapons -3) replace 2 dumb-bombs with bomblette pods: containing 200 bomblettes(50 bomblettes per drop) used as the MEC cluster bomb(AT/AP) -4) slightly improving the cannoon from the SU25 -5) improving the Laser guided missiles(such as the BIG missiles on the green camo "sniper" so that 1 laser guided missile kills a tank(not nearly kill it and injur it badly, also improve the USMC LGMs slightly)

10-22-2007, 07:29 PM	#2
BetterDeadThanRed Join Date: Feb 2007 United States of America Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado Posts: 1,726	The last thing we need is 3 CAS aircraft per side, but I do support removing one froggy in favor of the Su-39, although I doubt we will ever see this thing ingame.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. LeMazing.

10-22-2007, 07:55 PM	#3
ryan d ale Join Date: Feb 2007 United Kingdom Location: The Islamic Emirate Posts: 1,386	I don't care I've never flown a jet in PR lol Sounds good though - except 3 fixed wing aircraft per side.
	Project Reality's Official Self-Appointed Anti Tank Guru Over four years and still not banned To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Obligatory Epic Forum Quote (QFT + LOL) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-24-2007, 03:47 PM	#7
Doc_Frank Join Date: Mar 2007 Viet Nam Location: P?cs Posts: 245	And the PPSh-41 submachine gun has a liability to jam, but that doesn't happen in PR (hardcoded?). But 1) The SU-25 is still the basic aircraft of the Russian Airforce (the model is about as old as the F-16, F-18 ) 2) The TM version is actually the SU-39.
	"The torture never stops."

10-24-2007, 04:00 PM	#8
Warmagi Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Zyrardow - Poland/Dundee - Scotland Posts: 291	someone said it before that jamming is hardcoded. About the planes... dont care to much...
	[R-MOD]Mongolian_dude: ...remember to show as much respect to the new players as the veteran players. Todays 'noob' is tomorrow's 'Vet'. Reddish_Red: We're fine... Random.. ehmmm... "player": Give me the chopper. No. I want to fly. No. But I want to, get out from it now or I TK you. ... ... ... No

10-24-2007, 01:05 PM	#4
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 United Kingdom Location: Yooooorkshire! Posts: 2,136	Well as far as I'm aware the 25 is a little outdated compared to the 39 is it not? Doesn't seem to fit in with the MECs relatively decent quality equipment to me.

10-24-2007, 03:29 PM	#6
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 United Kingdom Location: Yooooorkshire! Posts: 2,136	Well from what I've read the 1st version of the 25T is extremely unpopular with pilots and not particularly effective. An army that can afford Mig29s should have a decent Anti-Tank aircraft.

10-24-2007, 05:06 PM	#9
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 United Kingdom Location: Yooooorkshire! Posts: 2,136	I know it's technically the Su39 but it's been upgraded from the 25T (although manages to look nowt like it). If an Su39 is ever made it should be given to the MEC though cos it creates a preeeety big gap in the quality of their equipment.

10-24-2007, 05:56 PM	#10
[R-DEV]77SiCaRiO77 PR Artwork Team Join Date: May 2006 Spain Posts: 3,950	Su39 is already maded , look at the armored fury boosterpack , it just need a reskin .

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links