|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
|
|
SGT.JOKER>FTW<(Fight To Win) In Game
Just getting back in the game To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Riflemen, SAW Gunner, Grenaider. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
Location: USA
|
I don't think the Army really cares about that rule anymore. Many soldiers seem to get M4A1s now as do Marine Corp officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
PR:BF2 Developer
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,467
|
Already discussed, Lampshade. Your source may have been mistaken; as reported by veterans on this forum, refurbished / converted receivers were still stamped M4A1 despite being 3 rd burst only. So, until proven otherwise, I call bullshit on the Marines issuing unrestricted full-auto M4A1s to anybody except their Recon/MSOB detachments and perhaps FAST Company CQB teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
Location: USA
|
Why do you think it is bullshit? I believe the official report designated Marine Corp officers as receiving M4A1s. They don't pay that much attention to the whole three round burst only plan with the M4 series anyway. Different veterans also say different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,125
Location: Yooooorkshire!
|
I think he just wants to check your referencing. Due to what Bob and many others have said on the issuing of full auto rifles to U.S. troops, I'm very reluctant to believe you myself unless you show us where you got that info from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,902
Location: US
|
Quote:
| |
|
"Push the Envelope, Watch It Bend"
Tool ~ Lateralus |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 49
Location: Finland
|
SL ingame just needs a gun that kills enemies, doesn't really matter which one. M16 shoots bullets that do damage and they are lethal when you shoot enough of them.
MEC SL shoots a bigger bullet and chinese has great scope. Giving US SL m4 wouldn't really help much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,102
|
Quote:
The army absolutely does not issue full-auto variants of the M4, period. SOCOM does. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| officer |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|