|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 547
Location: Edinburgh, Zulu.
|
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviation to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn’t.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn’t, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it wasn’t. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn’t, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn’t, or vice versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn’t be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error. See? Simple! On a more serious note, can we clarify that the OP heard a lock-on tone while sat in AA? That would be interesting... |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "It is not the responsibility of a defender to leave the objective unguarded just so his opponent sucks less." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
Yeah I did hear lock a on tone.
But I sorta made this thread because I thought it was unreaslistic to get laser missiled to death an an AAA cannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,125
Location: Yooooorkshire!
|
*EDIT* Bugger it it's too complicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
Quote:
...does that make it sentient? Spooky! But, um, yeah... the AAA cannons are "lockable" - highly important targets for an A-10/any attack jet - so locking onto em with LGMs isn't that unfair. Well it's unfair in that the AAA are slow, unweildy and can't hit an A-10 for toffee, but not unfair in the sense that the A-10 wasn't doing anything it shouldn't. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "That's how it starts, Mas, with that warm happy feeling inside. Pretty soon you're rocking in the corner, a full grown dog addict, wondering where your next St Bernand is coming from..." - IAJTHOMAS "Did they say what he's angry about?" asked Annette Mitchell, 77, of the district, stranded after seeing a double feature of "Piranha 3D" and "The Last Exorcism." - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| aaa, laser, lock |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|