certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map, and other suggestion

Fernavliz · 08-14-2007, 07:32 PM

what about adding certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map and its location.

Like for example, a map that is located in saudi arabia where the MEC fights US coalition; give MEC some m1 abrams tanks because saudi arabia owns some of these tanks (i read about it somewhere). I know that the MEC would make like a general equipment for all their army but there are useful things, like m1 abrams tanks, that are owned by only some MEC countries (saudi arabia, egypt, kuwait) of the and no by all the other MEC (so their main tank is t-90 but with m1 abrams like secundary tank, at least on that map). And the same if the map is located in a MEC country with many useful vehicles, weapons, combat jets, etc different than the standart MEC (maybe the uniforms if it is different and that country´s army are very numerous, like iranians).

other suggestion (I think it is really unnesesary):
I´ve read that the MEC faction isn´t realistic enough for some players because it doesn´t represent (phisicaly

, languaje) countries like iran or afganistan that forms part of the MEC. I suggest to make a different a player model for the MEC that would look like "from a persian country"(iran, afganistan), this would replace the base rifleman kit or other base kit, so it would represent the irani´s soldiers in the MEC. Just a (dump) suggestion, what do you think?

(sorry for my english)

PlatinumA1 · 08-14-2007, 07:34 PM

yah i just did a search , they have some m1 abrams

edit: not their mbt

[R-MOD]Cp · 08-14-2007, 07:46 PM

Right now the T-90 is a mirror image of the m1a2 so I cant see the point of having 2 diffrent tanks on the same map and team with the exact same stats. BUT if in the future the T-90s lets say gets weaker than the abrams then I can see your point.

Ignore the ones saying the MEC faction is unrealistic, if we were totaly realistic then we would only have UK vs insurgents and US vs insurgents. but different skins would be nice, all MEC troops look like clones with diffrent Hats

El_Vikingo · 08-14-2007, 07:50 PM

It's up to the mapper to choose what vehicles go on their maps.

What I thought the thread was about was having a vehicle, such as the land rover have a 50.cal on one map and a nade launcher on another one.

BetterDeadThanRed · 08-14-2007, 07:55 PM

I like that idea better.

ShowMeTheMonkey · 08-14-2007, 07:57 PM

Such as this one that the Royal Marines got for their Xmas present in 2006?

Look at their smily faces!

77SiCaRiO77 · 08-14-2007, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El_Vikingo

It's up to the mapper to choose what vehicles go on their maps.

What I thought the thread was about was having a vehicle, such as the land rover have a 50.cal on one map and a nade launcher on another one.

i sugest that a while ago .

adding variety to vehicles , for example , having a cobra armed with 16 hellfires in one armor map , and a cobra armed with 8 tows and 2 pod of hydras in a inf map .

El_Vikingo · 08-14-2007, 08:15 PM

That would be much better than giving the opposite team the same vehicle.

Paladin-X · 08-14-2007, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cp20000

Right now the T-90 is a mirror image of the m1a2...

In what way?

[R-DEV]Bob_Marley · 08-14-2007, 10:09 PM

Well actually, its not, as the T-90 doesn't suck ingame compared with other armor.

It doesn't have nearly as many "sweet spots" as the M1 and is slightly smaller, iirc.

08-14-2007, 07:32 PM	#1
Fernavliz Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 15 Location: México	certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map, and other suggestion what about adding certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map and its location. Like for example, a map that is located in saudi arabia where the MEC fights US coalition; give MEC some m1 abrams tanks because saudi arabia owns some of these tanks (i read about it somewhere). I know that the MEC would make like a general equipment for all their army but there are useful things, like m1 abrams tanks, that are owned by only some MEC countries (saudi arabia, egypt, kuwait) of the and no by all the other MEC (so their main tank is t-90 but with m1 abrams like secundary tank, at least on that map). And the same if the map is located in a MEC country with many useful vehicles, weapons, combat jets, etc different than the standart MEC (maybe the uniforms if it is different and that country´s army are very numerous, like iranians). other suggestion (I think it is really unnesesary): I´ve read that the MEC faction isn´t realistic enough for some players because it doesn´t represent (phisicaly, languaje) countries like iran or afganistan that forms part of the MEC. I suggest to make a different a player model for the MEC that would look like "from a persian country"(iran, afganistan), this would replace the base rifleman kit or other base kit, so it would represent the irani´s soldiers in the MEC. Just a (dump) suggestion, what do you think? (sorry for my english)
Fernavliz Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 15 Location: México

08-14-2007, 07:50 PM	#4
El_Vikingo Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,838 Location: Inside the "Search Function".	It's up to the mapper to choose what vehicles go on their maps. What I thought the thread was about was having a vehicle, such as the land rover have a 50.cal on one map and a nade launcher on another one.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. *If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.*

08-14-2007, 07:55 PM	#5
BetterDeadThanRed Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,718 United States of America Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado	I like that idea better.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. LeMazing.

08-14-2007, 07:57 PM	#6
ShowMeTheMonkey Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 33 Location: Wolverhampton, UK	Such as this one that the Royal Marines got for their Xmas present in 2006? Look at their smily faces!
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

08-14-2007, 08:15 PM	#8
El_Vikingo Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,838 Location: Inside the "Search Function".	That would be much better than giving the opposite team the same vehicle.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. *If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.*

08-14-2007, 07:34 PM	#2
PlatinumA1 Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 383 United States of America Location: Dallas, Texas	yah i just did a search , they have some m1 abrams edit: not their mbt

08-14-2007, 07:46 PM	#3
[R-MOD]Cp Forum Moderator Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 2,211 Europe	Right now the T-90 is a mirror image of the m1a2 so I cant see the point of having 2 diffrent tanks on the same map and team with the exact same stats. BUT if in the future the T-90s lets say gets weaker than the abrams then I can see your point. Ignore the ones saying the MEC faction is unrealistic, if we were totaly realistic then we would only have UK vs insurgents and US vs insurgents. but different skins would be nice, all MEC troops look like clones with diffrent Hats

08-14-2007, 10:09 PM	#10
[R-DEV]Bob_Marley PR:BF2 Developer Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,677 United Kingdom Location: Manchester	Well actually, its not, as the T-90 doesn't suck ingame compared with other armor. It doesn't have nearly as many "sweet spots" as the M1 and is slightly smaller, iirc.
	The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links