would it be cool to have MLRS

[worst 3]

i think it be cool to see MLRS in the game. i dont know that much about them but i seen pictures of them lunching rockets and it looks so cool im sure not for the guy on the other end but i love to see rokets like that flying over head. i dont think it would be to that hard to use just add arch to rokets and make new ones ok so it be a bit hard but the veicle is easy to make it a box. love to see it in the game any one else.

and for controls i think if you want to fire u have to stop press the fire buton to get in to the aiming view. where the flaps on the front go down so u dont get blinded. then you have it so u clik a buton and that adds 10 meter on it range. you would need help for a suad to aim it. like the range finder if you hit this target. there would be a min rang of like not sure 75-100 meters not suer and maby a little indicatr saying how far u are aiming. any whay i think it would be cool to have and be real.

<a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.namsa.nato.int/gallery/systems/mlrs3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.namsa.nato.int/gallery/ws_mlrs_e.htm&h=346&w=620&sz=48&tbnid=qFDDfLGd15AJ :&tbnh=74&tbnw=134&hl=en&start=12&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmlrs%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%2 6sa%3DN">LINK<a>

and sory if it bin asked again but i did not see any one mention it

[keef_haggerd]

id like to see them in, just make them hard to use, the MLRS in POE were so much fun to use, but it had to be very coordinated. give them a long reload time and they would be perfect.

say there was a small convoy of tanks coming in, get someone out there to spot, and you can rain some damage on them. you could also, with proper arty, set up choke points with missles on one side and artillery on the other.

[worst 3]

dont think they should be able to reaload with out suplies and it should take a some time to reload too from the suplies. i think there shear fire power makes up for the fact that they can only hold the amount reay to fire. dont know what type of round tho. thy only have to relod pods so i think it should take 20 sec min for each to be rearmed and u have to use the entire pod to use them. i would like them to be very dependent on spoters for there use good for team work :)

[CobraPhantom]

If point-and-click arty is taken out, Ill take anything. I love the MLRS and BM21 from DC, nothing ever really matched it.
I vote hell yeah becuz I want manned arty.

[Tacamo]

Would be interesting to see if different warheads could be added. Like ATACMS, BAT submunitions, FAE's, or UAV's depending on the MLRS system in use.

[Evil Koala]

As I've said in one of my previous posts... I'd like to see MLRS, and naval bombardments (depending on the map, beach maps would use naval bombardments, and land maps would use MLRS). It would offer a more devestating form of artillery. Though I dont think it should be player controller. Only called in similiar to how artillery is used now. Only it would come from off-map since MLRS, and Naval Guns can reach well over 20 miles. And the effect would be complete devastation. Like a current 4 gun artillery attack X 10. To keep things somewhat balanced, the recharge for another strike would take 10x longer as well. I wrote up a better discription of this idea in "Artillery.. ughh" on page 4.

[m0ldym1lk]

http://usimod.clanspy.net

Heil.


Though I agree that it would make a great addition to PR too

[worst 3]

i dont like the idea of off map becuse you cant desrtoy. i dont think they would be a good idea on all maps too. some should have starionary art, others mobile. or a combination but the time betwen use of lets say stationary should be much much longer. i think it should have the damage it dose spred out over a longer bombaredment so it could be used as supressing fire when men move up. the mlrs would be used to take out targets, they would lay down a quick bombardment over a smaller area. and also i would see them as haveing diffret angle there rorkets would be comeing in form. they would be comeing in at a 30 degree angle where the art comes in at a 89 degree angle. they would have diffrent uses and also have diffrent draw backs. (they sould take a looooong time to respawn minuts and easier to destroy then art becuse of its mobility. and i found a russian verson soo that would be mec and chinas beucse china use it and mec uses china gear.

http://military.china.com/zh_cn/armi...2/12079590.htm

i think that the one with the 16 pods would be mec not sure tho

[solodude23]

Yeah, in DC these were not very good, due to the extra fast un-organiseed gameplay, but in DCR I remember the BM-21....omg...I remember this one map especially...DCR_Bridge_Crossing....they could have a spotter spot before or afrer the bridge and it would be impossible to cross the bridge at all unless you had a small infantry group cross the river and go find the source of the artillery.

I remember times, we had our tank convoy of like 3 Abrams and a Bradley or two....we would clear all enemy ground units it our path. T-55's T-72's, BRDM's, infantry, etc....then..once we got to the end of the bridge all hell would brake loose. Was damn fun though. If used right the U.S. Artillery rocked as well.

[Agent556]

ah the good old days eh solo? i miss it too