|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
| View Poll Results: What should be done with SF kit | |||
| Get rid of it |
|
58 | 16.81% |
| Make it a limited kit |
|
69 | 20.00% |
| Make it a paratrooper kit |
|
91 | 26.38% |
| Make it a CQB rifleman kit |
|
72 | 20.87% |
| Leave it alone |
|
55 | 15.94% |
| Voters: 345. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#161 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,573
|
And what exactly would they parachute out of?
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
@Cheeseman
It's not the M4A1 that is the problem. It's the fact that people use them as front line fighters and not as behind the lines operators. and yes, the canadians will be superdy dooper |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,200
Location: The Land of ... err...
|
@Neoteknix
I've posted a similar idea earlier in this thread (pages 2-3 I believe). My version is a bit more restricted and the kits are slightly less loaded. It went around unnoticed so it's probably a pretty bad idea. Also, as I've said before, 9mm ammo isn't really that efficient when it come to armored targets such as MEC soldiers. I also agree with Jaymz here. It's not what it is, it's how it is used. |
|
This signature is here due to lack of imagination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,573
|
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,135
Location: UK
|
I would love the Spec Ops to become a Forward Observer so when we are able to use to SOFLAM to designate targets it would pwn
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 486
|
Make it a Recon kit.
|
|
The third "never again" in a hundred years
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
Location: USA
|
Quote:
I would rather see C7A1s for the Canadians however. (they still build and use them) | |
|
|
|
|
#169 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 142
Location: Over the hills and far away in a sand pit.
|
i'll probably get hated for this, but push it towards proper spec ops roles... MP5SD sub machine gun (ie Supressed, but only accurate at short range, zerod at maybe 50m with a red dod sight),
pistol (probably not needed), C4 x 2 or 3 a few frags (unless you want to use BF2:Special Forces (rofl) flash bangs and a couple of smoke.... 1 x screening, 1 x signal. Maybe a SOFLAM? when they work properly instead of the C4 and NO BODY ARMOUR. make it the class that gets sent to do the dirty work like destroying assets behind the lines, and good at CQC IF! the opperator has good reactions Andy.. (awaiting flaming) |
|
God is Airborne only because he failed the commando course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
I just have honest Constructive ideas towards what is a great modification (infact i havent played BF2 Since i downloaded it Please enlighten me - Whats Vanilla ? | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| forces, kit, special |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|