The Tiger: potential replacment for the fugly Vodnik? - Page 3

NavalLord · 02-23-2007, 11:10 AM

That nos it tight man. We need to put some mad spinnaz on dem things yo. Also add some hydrolics so we can bounce. Put some low profile tires on dem things and then we'll be ballin'.

Ok now back to my white self.
MEC could definately use with a new vehicle. The vodnik is a giant target because of it's large size.
One issues I've been having with all non-crewman kit required vehicles. Sometimes they just won't move. I don't think it's because they're damaged because they'll be at the main base. But you get in them and floor it and nothing happens.

[R-DEV]77SiCaRiO77 · 02-23-2007, 12:08 PM

more imageshack

Lucid Nightmare · 02-23-2007, 12:31 PM

Vodnik is the sex. I'd really like to see it remodeled and amphibious. Some more of that army asymmetry we've all been looking for.

=*CLA*=StudMuffin21 · 02-23-2007, 05:43 PM

That thing may work very well..and I'm sure it does considering the purpose of it. But just like the H2 and H3 it looks like complete SHIT!!!!!!!!!!! WAY too round!

Why oh why did GM have to stop making the H1 for civilians?!?!??! Who cares about sales...it's all about what it's meant for!

Sorry, just my .02 I'm just really disappointed on the look of new vehicles.

Top_Cat_AxJnAt · 02-23-2007, 06:25 PM

Wake up and smell the "Dont give a foock"!!!!!!!!!!

I am sorry, but the DEVs have clearly stated, through the use of passive resistance, (heheee) over the last year that remodeling the present transport jeeps is at the bottom of their priority list.

They will however borrow/steal/pillage (take your pick!) other transport jeeps modeled by other mods, like Humvee with TOW and Repair Humvee.

So inconclusion i suggest you dont put to much effort into trying to perswade them or get your hopes up in any way. The DEVs in this area have brocken my heart but then crammed it with some many other "goodies" i cannot complain over the last year - i have learnt to adjust my tactics, shut up and enjoy what is already shockinly brillaint.
New transport will come but not any time soon and they will probaly come in drips and drabs.

GeZe · 02-23-2007, 06:27 PM

Oh, I know that the DEVs will not model this. I am just hoping some new person to modeling will model this as their application to become a DEV.

02-23-2007, 11:10 AM	#21
NavalLord Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 238	That nos it tight man. We need to put some mad spinnaz on dem things yo. Also add some hydrolics so we can bounce. Put some low profile tires on dem things and then we'll be ballin'. Ok now back to my white self. MEC could definately use with a new vehicle. The vodnik is a giant target because of it's large size. One issues I've been having with all non-crewman kit required vehicles. Sometimes they just won't move. I don't think it's because they're damaged because they'll be at the main base. But you get in them and floor it and nothing happens.
NavalLord Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 238	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

02-23-2007, 12:31 PM	#23
Lucid Nightmare Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Western Australia Posts: 530	Vodnik is the sex. I'd really like to see it remodeled and amphibious. Some more of that army asymmetry we've all been looking for.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I put the "laughter" into "manslaughter".

02-23-2007, 05:43 PM	#24
=CLA=StudMuffin21 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 103	That thing may work very well..and I'm sure it does considering the purpose of it. But just like the H2 and H3 it looks like complete SHIT!!!!!!!!!!! WAY too round! Why oh why did GM have to stop making the H1 for civilians?!?!??! Who cares about sales...it's all about what it's meant for! Sorry, just my .02 I'm just really disappointed on the look of new vehicles.
	"Deadly as lightning, soft as a breeze, strike FAST, strike HARD........then return unseen."

02-23-2007, 06:27 PM	#26
GeZe PR Artwork Team Join Date: Feb 2006 Canada Location: Victoria, BC Posts: 3,421 Blog Entries: 2	Oh, I know that the DEVs will not model this. I am just hoping some new person to modeling will model this as their application to become a DEV.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. *To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-23-2007, 12:08 PM	#22
[R-DEV]77SiCaRiO77 PR Artwork Team Join Date: May 2006 Spain Posts: 3,950	more imageshack

02-23-2007, 06:25 PM	#25
Top_Cat_AxJnAt Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: "destruction of WEYBRIDGE and Shepperton" - WaroftheWorlds Posts: 3,217	Wake up and smell the "Dont give a foock"!!!!!!!!!! I am sorry, but the DEVs have clearly stated, through the use of passive resistance, (heheee) over the last year that remodeling the present transport jeeps is at the bottom of their priority list. They will however borrow/steal/pillage (take your pick!) other transport jeeps modeled by other mods, like Humvee with TOW and Repair Humvee. So inconclusion i suggest you dont put to much effort into trying to perswade them or get your hopes up in any way. The DEVs in this area have brocken my heart but then crammed it with some many other "goodies" i cannot complain over the last year - i have learnt to adjust my tactics, shut up and enjoy what is already shockinly brillaint. New transport will come but not any time soon and they will probaly come in drips and drabs.

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links