GOOD SUGESTION TO MOD: A real utility for the Spec Ops kit - Page 2

[DVB] TRIggS · 12-30-2006, 04:53 PM

I like the idea a suppressed weapon but maybe only in the officer kit. that would counteract the "army of silenced weapons". It would also make more people want to have that kit.

V3N0N_br · 12-30-2006, 05:15 PM

Requestable stealth specops with silenced Mp5 for US, silenced AKs74u for insurgents, Mp5 as well for MEC?
Well, it's what I think would do good. Keeping the normal Spec ops.

Xizor · 12-30-2006, 05:20 PM

You can't just screw a supressor on an MP5. People need to stop saying that, it's a whole new weapon, the MP5SD:

And the MP5 is no more than a rapid fire pistol. It's weak, it fires 9mm rounds and is inaccurate.

[DVB] TRIggS · 12-30-2006, 05:24 PM

yea its more of a pdw or police weapon and has no place in the hands of a frontline soldier other than tank crew.

Bodybag2224 · 12-30-2006, 05:38 PM

Question: On Socom Navy Seals Fireteam Bravo 2, the silencer's that you can equip your weapon with are heavy and light, when you read the description on them it says that they muffle the sound but reduce accuracy. WTF??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????
I thought that silencers kept or improved the accuracy, but limited the dammage that the slug does to the enemy. Which is right??

Animalmother · 12-30-2006, 05:49 PM

IMO if you give it silencers, spec ops should be a limited kit.

Hitperson · 12-30-2006, 06:04 PM

perhaps specops as a limeted kit??

JellyBelly · 12-30-2006, 06:14 PM

If the SF got the MP5SD6, it would have to be on urban maps. Like Xizor said, its 9mm. The range isnt amazing on them so it would be limited to CQB.

eggman · 12-30-2006, 07:26 PM

Not too many SF operators carry MP5s anymore. And very few use suppressed weapons afaik, but it would fit the way the class *should* be played (as opposed to how it currently is with the M4).

Plus uh... hehe.. while game ideas are always welcome.. er.... 60% of the discussions on the forums revolve around the US, 30% around the UK and 10% take into account the MEC and PLA.. gets a lil tiring when folks repeatedly discuss how simple it would be to do "X" based solely on the view that the US or British factions are the only ones we need to look at.

We have some plans in place that sorta add a different perspective on the role of the SF class, but not for v0.5. If I told you about the plans I'd have to come to your house and kill you with a suppressed MP5.

MasterTom · 12-30-2006, 08:05 PM

you'd be a specops at that period of time, right?

12-30-2006, 04:53 PM	#11
[DVB] TRIggS Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 399	I like the idea a suppressed weapon but maybe only in the officer kit. that would counteract the "army of silenced weapons". It would also make more people want to have that kit.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-30-2006, 05:15 PM	#12
V3N0N_br Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 595	Requestable stealth specops with silenced Mp5 for US, silenced AKs74u for insurgents, Mp5 as well for MEC? Well, it's what I think would do good. Keeping the normal Spec ops.
V3N0N_br Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 595	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-30-2006, 05:20 PM	#13
Xizor Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: England! Posts: 135	You can't just screw a supressor on an MP5. People need to stop saying that, it's a whole new weapon, the MP5SD: And the MP5 is no more than a rapid fire pistol. It's weak, it fires 9mm rounds and is inaccurate.
Xizor Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: England! Posts: 135

12-30-2006, 05:24 PM	#14
[DVB] TRIggS Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 399	yea its more of a pdw or police weapon and has no place in the hands of a frontline soldier other than tank crew.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-30-2006, 05:38 PM	#15
Bodybag2224 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 209	Question: On Socom Navy Seals Fireteam Bravo 2, the silencer's that you can equip your weapon with are heavy and light, when you read the description on them it says that they muffle the sound but reduce accuracy. WTF??????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????? I thought that silencers kept or improved the accuracy, but limited the dammage that the slug does to the enemy. Which is right??
Bodybag2224 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 209

12-30-2006, 06:04 PM	#17
Hitperson Retired Tournament Lead Join Date: Nov 2005 United Kingdom Location: Chippenham (ish) Posts: 6,950 Blog Entries: 1	perhaps specops as a limeted kit??
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down" Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon." M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks" [R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."

12-30-2006, 06:14 PM	#18
JellyBelly Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: The United States of England Posts: 1,310	If the SF got the MP5SD6, it would have to be on urban maps. Like Xizor said, its 9mm. The range isnt amazing on them so it would be limited to CQB.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [RGG] - Pte.Phillips - *To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.* - Arma ftw Really Gay Guy America was a tad late into the First World War. They redeemed themself's and came in slightly sooner in the Second. Now they seem determined to start the Third.

12-30-2006, 07:26 PM	#19
eggman Retired PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2005 Canada Posts: 11,377 Blog Entries: 2	Not too many SF operators carry MP5s anymore. And very few use suppressed weapons afaik, but it would fit the way the class should be played (as opposed to how it currently is with the M4). Plus uh... hehe.. while game ideas are always welcome.. er.... 60% of the discussions on the forums revolve around the US, 30% around the UK and 10% take into account the MEC and PLA.. gets a lil tiring when folks repeatedly discuss how simple it would be to do "X" based solely on the view that the US or British factions are the only ones we need to look at. We have some plans in place that sorta add a different perspective on the role of the SF class, but not for v0.5. If I told you about the plans I'd have to come to your house and kill you with a suppressed MP5.
	Cheers! egg To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-30-2006, 08:05 PM	#20
MasterTom Retired PR Developer Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tiel, The Netherlands Posts: 687	you'd be a specops at that period of time, right?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links