Battlefield 3 (PC Game)

[Hitman.2.5]

Originally Posted by SuperTimo

gimme a cold war turned hot scenario

in total agreement XD

[Smegburt_funkledink]

Originally Posted by gx

That doesn't make sense

Did it make sense that BF2 has many flaws that BF:1942 didn't? No.

Did it make sense that EA created a landing craft that was in the game content but couldn't actually carry vehicles? No.



It just doesn't make sense.

Oh and Hitman, don't quote Timo, he rage quitted off the face of the planet.

EDIT: How the hell can I spell sense wrong three times?..

[fludblud]

unlike all you pessimists, the release of MAG has shown that large scale multiplayer can work and is selling quite well (despite the juggernaut that is mass effect 2) and seeing that MAG has no equivalent on the 360 or PC, BF3 seems perfectly poised to take it. i think DICE will make BF3 bigger and better with such lessons learned, its no longer the king of large scale fps, so lets hope theyre willing to take it back!

i mean, activision pretty much has the entire small scale fast paced shooter genre locked down and seeing that MW2 ended in a cliffhanger, it would be pretty suicidal to go down that route.

[gazzthompson]

Originally Posted by John-117

Sent Dice a email, asking them to not flip up. Btw i told them to check out the mod. I asked for 128 players, saying that graphics werent the most important things for gamers. Lets hope i get a reply and i might possible make a difference

wont happen.

[DaKillerFox]

I just saw clips of the PC Beta for BC2 and it looked amazingly like MW2 but with Tanks, Vehicles and Aircraft. Also, it has been stated that it only has support for up to 32 players? Is that right? Half of BF2? What makes you guys think that BF3 is gonna have more? There is a correct point being made that the games are now being dictated by the consoles and there really aren't anymore 64+ games for PC. I can say that the only thing that looks appealing about BC2 and possibly BF3 is the graphics, the gameplay is ridiculous.

[gx]

Originally Posted by DaKillerFox

I just saw clips of the PC Beta for BC2 and it looked amazingly like MW2 but with Tanks, Vehicles and Aircraft. Also, it has been stated that it only has support for up to 32 players? Is that right? Half of BF2? What makes you guys think that BF3 is gonna have more? There is a correct point being made that the games are now being dictated by the consoles and there really aren't anymore 64+ games for PC. I can say that the only thing that looks appealing about BC2 and possibly BF3 is the graphics, the gameplay is ridiculous.

They will probably use a different engine, not to mention I do hope battlefield 3 is pc only so they can do more with it. Not to mention if it doesn't have more than 32 players then what do we have? bad company2 they wouldn't do make two of the exact same games or they would have no sales, I'm sure they realize this.

[Cassius]

Not particularly looking forward to it. Games like ARMA 2, once bitchpatched in place should make a far better plattform for a tactical shooter than BF 3, which will be very similiar to BF 2, which is just blaaah.

The only good thing about BF 2 was that it sold a lot, so there was a large basis for a mod like PR, but apart from that, a lot of the times the devs wanted to change or add something it was like, hardcoded lol.

[bloodthirsty_viking]

Originally Posted by driver-ch-driver

as far as i know, no-ones ever made a game about the Falklands war...

or the cod war... (not as good a war as yours, but still)

[[R-CON]Snares]

I want it to be PC only!

[Smegburt_funkledink]

Despite what i previously said, it shouldn't have to be PC only.

BF2 came out on console as a simpler version of the game. Games like GTA would always come out on PC first but when a massive corporation such as Microsoft get their hands on it, things get shat all over.

The entire gaming world is now going backwards. Games come out on console first, then get ported to PC as well as the fact that games are becoming smaller, simpler but shinier.