project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > Off-Topic Forums > Off-Topic Discussion
24 Jul 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Off-Topic Discussion For all discussions not related to PR. No Spam.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2009, 09:37 PM   #21
RED

RED's Avatar
Default Re: Anyone good at calculus based physics? I need some help

My solution for 1.a:

As stated before you'll have to find out the volume of said gold-sample by:

Mass / Density = Volume
4.831g / (19.32g/cm³) = 0.25005176 cm³

I also use a square as my base of calculation of the 'leaf':

length x width x height = volume of square / leaf
l x w x 4.562x10^-6m = 0.25005176 cm³

-> l x w = 0.00025005176 m³ / 4.562x10^-6 m

l x w = 54.8118719... m² nevermind the l x w, solution is: 54.8118719... m²

Will try and solve the rest


1.b
Using the volume from 1.a:

Volume cylinder = r² x pi x h |h = height = what we're looking for
0.00025005176m³ = [2.600x10^-6 m]² x 3.1415 x h

0.00025005176m³ / ([2.600x10^-6 m]² x 3.1415) = h
0.00025005176m³ / 2.1237x10^-11m² = h

Will quit now, good luck anyways


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
RED is offline
Last edited by RED; 08-28-2009 at 09:52 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 10:03 PM   #22
TeLe
Default Re: Anyone good at calculus based physics? I need some help

Thanks for the effort all of you. I appreciate it a lot but it appears none of the answers were right for the first question :/ It might have been my calculator work but the second question, I got everything correct except B.

Answers for question 2
(a)3.31s
(b)2.40e1 kg* this one was incorrect, I didnt have it in kg, i just had it in grams
(c)2.64e-2 kg/min
(d)-1.61e-2 kg.min

Answers for question 1
(a)0.05481 m^2
(b)11750 m

I ended up with a 12.33/15 for this homework. I might be dropping this class but who knows. Thanks again for trying to help me. You guys were awesome.
TeLe is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 04:31 AM   #23
Nitneuc
Supporting Member

Nitneuc's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Nitneuc
Default Re: Anyone good at calculus based physics? I need some help

Actually if you look at what I wrote for 1)a) that's not as wrong as your teacher thinks :
I wrote the surface of one side of the leaf is 0.0548 m2 and the whole surface of gold is twice as big (which is true).

for 1)b) I think you made something wrong with the calculator, I get Length = 11771 m for :
Quote:
Length = 2.5x10^-7 / ((2.6x10^-6)^2 x Pi )
Which is pretty close to what you have to find (again, I use the window calculator and cut a lot of numbers after the dot).

Good job with the second, this one was rather difficult.

Many thanks to everyone involved in the making of the best videogaming experience ever !
Nitneuc is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
based, calculus, good, physics
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.