PR2 wishlist (for fun)

[Anhkhoa]

Ability to control ingame players by doing what they do just you dont actually do it...
YouTube - Gamer Movie Trailer
Like that, just with avatars not actual humans.

[Scot]

Gimmie the British Army, and Scot shall be a happy bunny.


For the record 'Gamer' looks SO badass.

[McBumLuv]

Originally Posted by P2KK

A monthly subscription to filter all the troublemakers.

Not really going to help at all, considering the "troublemakers" pay extra for their hacks, anyways.

Also, infantry, I want no deviation, except of course the actual deviation of a gun, which would really only be noticable at long distances (like what, a kilometer?).

Ballistics, wind effects, physics, no jumping, leaning, stamina, and dynamic kits for infantry to start out with.

Three man crew for tanks (Driver, gunner, and commander), AI loader, interiors, and 3-D screens.

3-D displays for everything, Radar, stabilization, physics, a 500km x 500km map, up to 256 players, maybe another ~500 NPCs.

You know, the works

[Valtasar]

Some kind of system where oficers player can punish priver players for not listening to them or doing something wrong.
More player on the field.

True first person view, with “the camera” inside the head and physical body below viewable by the playe

- I wish all FPS had this in them.

[RedAlertSF]

- Physics like Crysis
- at least 128 players
- map size more than 100 square kilometers
- 3D and normal voip ingame
- realistic ballistics
- realistic jets & copters
- NVGs
- Arctic warfare - we need SNOW

[[R-DEV]Jaymz]

As many of you know, a small group of PR developers (not detracting attention away from PR1) are working towards an independent game. It's only in very early trial and error stages right now and we won't have anything to show publicly for a long time.

Believe me when I say that in a perfect world, we want it to have most of the features mentioned in this thread. But we need to take a few more baby steps to find out if we can actually achieve them. Just keep in mind that to professionally fund a game that wanted 90% of the features in this thread would cost well in excess of 1 million USD...and..emm...we have no money

Originally Posted by RedAlertSF

- Physics like Crysis
- at least 128 players

With online gaming technology the way it is, you can't have both of those without severe security issues. Crysis and BF:BC have rich and detailed environments that you can chew up and manipulate with a machinegun but that hogs up all the networking bandwidth (why do you think they have such low player limits?).

[Brummy]

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Jaymz

With online gaming technology the way it is, you can't have both of those without severe security issues. Crysis and BF:BC have rich and detailed environments that you can chew up and manipulate with a machinegun but that hogs up all the networking bandwidth (why do you think they have such low player limits?).

Solution: We all move to Sweden.

[gas104]

Originally Posted by P2KK

This thread is going to be so.. spammed.. Anyways something I want in PR2?

Bigger Squads.
Bigger maps.
A monthly subscription to filter all the troublemakers.
Bullet ballistics.

noooooooooooooooooooo!11 my parents wont pay for that

[Farks]

Originally Posted by Brummy

Solution: We all move to Sweden.

No way! I'll never share my (soon) 100 Mbit/s optical fiber connection!

[badmojo420]

If it's just for fun i'll wish for the impossible and say extremely massive maps. Where the carriers would have to be driven within range to launch jets which would fly for minutes just to reach their target, drop their bombs then return to rearm and refuel. Of course maps of this magnitude would have amazing changes on every aspect of the game, i just used the carrier/jet example to show the sheer size i want in a game.