PLA vs US

[R-CON]77SiCaRiO77 · 12-08-2007, 12:02 PM

a combination of varius games (lock on , arma ,bf2)and a good editation .

YouTube Video

YouTube Video

jackal22 · 12-08-2007, 02:18 PM

wow thats a rare find, a film where the us dont win. i like it it makes a change from all teh us rambo stuff the world gets thrown every other second,

however im a little confused with the story. did the us blow up the carrier so the chinese blew up the spy plane but one got shot down so china made a rescue attempt?

[R-CON]ZZEZ · 12-08-2007, 02:19 PM

WOW! A really stunning film, I enjoyed every second of it.

BetterDeadThanRed · 12-08-2007, 02:28 PM

Maybe if all Chinese jets didn't have a nagging habit of catching on fire this would have some credibility.

That seriously made me want to throw up.

gazzthompson · 12-08-2007, 04:54 PM

i noes !!! US losing !?!?!?!??! WTFROFLZOR !! USA could so wtfpwn every one !

[R-DEV]Rhino · 12-08-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackal22

wow thats a rare find, a film where the us dont win. i like it it makes a change from all teh us rambo stuff the world gets thrown every other second

and that was the only reason I watched it, was just going to pass it off till I read that

good video, liked it. Main thing thou is I would have liked to see them try and blend the lighting abit more in between games. They already did a little bit of modding so should have really taken it a few steps thurther to make it so that each game had the same lighting, skybox etc or near enough as it often changes bits to diffrent games in a flash, and the new lighting just didnt quite fit.

still thought it was pretty well done thou

Crusader09 · 12-08-2007, 11:10 PM

I find it hard to believe that Chinese aircraft would be able to close in and successfully attack a US Carrier group. For one, the AEGIS ships would be constantly looking around and with the carrier based AWACS planes, extend that radar range. You also have patrol groups in the air to be able to engage without having to waste time launching aircraft. Even if enemy planes were flying as low as they were, the AEGIS group would've shot them down like playing duck hunt. Lastly, if any air-to-surface missile was fired at the carrier, the AEGIS ships would shoot it down easily. Especially if it came close for the CIWS system to fire up.

Sorry, but as much as I thought the movie was top notch, I had to get this off my chest.

Teek · 12-08-2007, 11:33 PM

1. I cant understand why what is happening because the subtitles are in Mandarin
2. Why did a E3 have no fighter cover? If it was because they didn't expect it, well that would be implausible due to the fact they just recently committed a act of war.
3. How did the C-5 fit in?
4. the whole China pwns US theme kind of reminds me of both gulf wars. The US troops act like Iraqis, in training and equipment, standing in the open then panicking while a Heli MG rips you apart? why not use one of the AT4s that should be in a squad of 12?

The US loses theme is a good change, but the resons it is so rare is because it is unrealistic/implausible, thus a China wins-US loses movie is almost propaganda when made in china.

It was a well made movie with good editing and acting.

BetterDeadThanRed · 12-09-2007, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teek

1. I cant understand why what is happening because the subtitles are in Mandarin
2. Why did a E3 have no fighter cover? If it was because they didn't expect it, well that would be implausible due to the fact they just recently committed a act of war.
3. How did the C-5 fit in?
4. the whole China pwns US theme kind of reminds me of both gulf wars. The US troops act like Iraqis, in training and equipment, standing in the open then panicking while a Heli MG rips you apart? why not use one of the AT4s that should be in a squad of 12?

The US loses theme is a good change, but the resons it is so rare is because it is unrealistic/implausible, thus a China wins-US loses movie is almost propaganda when made in china.

It was a well made movie with good editing and acting.

Thank you. Honestly, I would enjoy a good US loses war movie, but when China does it, it is at best laughable and at worst propaganda. This seems like the latter to me.

H3eadshot · 12-09-2007, 12:43 AM

I thought it was boring as hell, sorry

12-08-2007, 02:18 PM	#2
jackal22 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 760	wow thats a rare find, a film where the us dont win. i like it it makes a change from all teh us rambo stuff the world gets thrown every other second, however im a little confused with the story. did the us blow up the carrier so the chinese blew up the spy plane but one got shot down so china made a rescue attempt?
jackal22 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 760

12-08-2007, 02:28 PM	#4
BetterDeadThanRed German Forces Mod Lead Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: USA Posts: 1,555	Maybe if all Chinese jets didn't have a nagging habit of catching on fire this would have some credibility. That seriously made me want to throw up.
	German Forces Mod Status
	Last edited by BetterDeadThanRed; 12-08-2007 at 02:47 PM..

12-08-2007, 04:54 PM	#5
gazzthompson Join Date: Jan 2007 United Kingdom Location: norfolk Posts: 2,878	i noes !!! US losing !?!?!?!??! WTFROFLZOR !! USA could so wtfpwn every one !
	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6MhLIRfjEk my A-10 PR video supporter of Norwegians for PR

12-08-2007, 11:10 PM	#7
Crusader09 Join Date: Jun 2007 United States of America Location: California Posts: 177	I find it hard to believe that Chinese aircraft would be able to close in and successfully attack a US Carrier group. For one, the AEGIS ships would be constantly looking around and with the carrier based AWACS planes, extend that radar range. You also have patrol groups in the air to be able to engage without having to waste time launching aircraft. Even if enemy planes were flying as low as they were, the AEGIS group would've shot them down like playing duck hunt. Lastly, if any air-to-surface missile was fired at the carrier, the AEGIS ships would shoot it down easily. Especially if it came close for the CIWS system to fire up. Sorry, but as much as I thought the movie was top notch, I had to get this off my chest.
	=ICC= In game name: ELITE_TANKER "Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak, and esteem to all." -George Washington

12-08-2007, 11:33 PM	#8
Teek Join Date: Dec 2006 Canada Location: Vancouver Posts: 2,663	1. I cant understand why what is happening because the subtitles are in Mandarin 2. Why did a E3 have no fighter cover? If it was because they didn't expect it, well that would be implausible due to the fact they just recently committed a act of war. 3. How did the C-5 fit in? 4. the whole China pwns US theme kind of reminds me of both gulf wars. The US troops act like Iraqis, in training and equipment, standing in the open then panicking while a Heli MG rips you apart? why not use one of the AT4s that should be in a squad of 12? The US loses theme is a good change, but the resons it is so rare is because it is unrealistic/implausible, thus a China wins-US loses movie is almost propaganda when made in china. It was a well made movie with good editing and acting.
	Determined bomber [R-DEV]RikiRude: Hehe I think Teek is on the money [TT]engineer: Wow, camo that doesn't look like the designers took a dump on a piece of canvas and shouted "BRILLIANT!".

12-08-2007, 02:19 PM	#3
[R-CON]ZZEZ PR Contributor Join Date: Jul 2007 Isreal Location: Israel Posts: 1,220	WOW! A really stunning film, I enjoyed every second of it.

12-09-2007, 12:43 AM	#10
H3eadshot Join Date: May 2007 United Kingdom Location: Edinburgh Posts: 838	I thought it was boring as hell, sorry
	"So tell me just how come were the Taliban Sat burning incense in Texas Roaming round in a Lexus Sittin’ on six billion oil drums Down with the Dow Jones, up on the Nasdaq Pushed into the war zones." Ingame: <1sk>Headshot

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links