Project Reality Forums

Project Reality Forums (http://www.realitymod.com/forum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f11-off-topic-discussion)
-   -   Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game) (http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f11-off-topic-discussion/103693-battlefield-3-mk-3-pc-console-game.html)

Dunehunter 10-03-2011 08:55 AM

Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
Battlefield 3 thread Mk.1
Battlefield 3 thread Mk. 2

Second one was getting laggy, so here's Mk. 3

Spush 10-03-2011 09:02 AM

Re: Battlefield 3? (PC/Console Game)
 
Pfft, so what it was getting a tad bit laggy. :p

Skodz 10-03-2011 09:03 AM

Re: Battlefield 3? (PC/Console Game)
 
I tested the open beta, I played bf2, all the booster pack, bf2142, pr of course, bfbc1, bfbc2 and honestly, I get absolutely no bf2 feeling at all while playing bf3. It totally feels like bfbc3.

Same graphics as BFBC2, same interface, same game modes, same classes, I really don't see how they could call this a sequel to bf2... To be a sequel, they would need bigger maps, no fucking rush game mode, mods support, better team organisation, a new unique interface, no single player, more classes, etc.

If there are rules about how to make a sequel, I'm pretty sure DICE didn't follow any.

Oh, sure, there are some improvement vs bfbc2, crouch, we can see our legs, nice animations but nothing really making it a brand new game... Merely an upgraded version of BFBC2.

I gotta say that map/game mode choice are really bad also for the open beta, maybe if it was a 64 player full vehicle conquest map it would feel a little bit more like bf2...

And there is almost no destruction in bf3. If there was 1 thing to keep from bfbc2, it was the total destruction...

And what's up with these glowing grenades, triangles on ennemies position, kill cam, displaying ennemies healthbar...

Huge disapointment.

I mean, it sure is an entertaining FPS but it's in no way a sequel to BF2. They should have called it something else, like call of bad company 3 or something like that.

No leaning still in 2011? Do they know like almost everyother FPS have it?

I was impressed with the deploy mode and mobile spawnpoint though, it's almost like they did learned something from PR afterall.

I'm curious to see if Armored Personel carrier can still only carry 2 people like bfbc2 lol.

Nebsif 10-03-2011 09:16 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
@Dune: One of the DICE baws dudes said in a video that open beta build is idd old, sth like 2weeks-month old.
Me thinks its more of battlelog and gameplay beta than anything else.

Spush 10-03-2011 09:17 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
I beg to differ, since I did mange to be able to play on the Caspian Border map quite a few times, and I am an avid Battlefield player been playing since 1942 (Desert Combat of course too), and the game sure did have a Battlefield feel, although rush feels a lot like BC2, the mechanics that transfers over to Conquest 64 works great, feels great looks great plays great. Don't judge this game on one map that they decided to show case and I do agree it was a terrible move for DICE to do so. I also understand your opinion and I do respect to fully, I just would like some people to be able to give this game a chance even though there are flaws that I do acknowledge, and hate terribly.

Brainlaag 10-03-2011 09:21 AM

Re: Battlefield 3? (PC/Console Game)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skodz (Post 1675601)
.....and mobile spawnpoint though, it's almost like they did learned something from PR afterall.

I'm curious to see if Armored Personel carrier can still only carry 2 people like bfbc2 lol.

BF2142, not PR my friend, best thing IMO is if they did a copy of BF2142 (best BF, not only gameplay wise but AT SOME POINT also technically seen).

Nebsif 10-03-2011 09:21 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
Every BF3 = BC2/3 argument is invalid if u didnt play Caspian Border, I dare say it even felt more PR'ish than any vanilla BF game.

gazzthompson 10-03-2011 09:37 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
Ive yet to play Caspian Border so my point may be void, but for it to feel like a 'battlefield 2 sequel', in my opinion, it would of needed a much better squad system than whats currently in BF3, thats what made BF2 for me.

But ill wait and see, hope i am proven wrong.

I am enjoying metro, now that i dissregard the game as a "battlefield" game and treat it as something different.

Ts4EVER 10-03-2011 09:45 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
Metro is not all that different from FH2 push maps imo. I always wondered why they designed them for 32 players only though.

LieutenantNessie 10-03-2011 09:50 AM

Re: Battlefield 3 Mk.3 (PC/Console Game)
 
Just give us some another map than OP Shitty Deadtrap.

The map just encourages spawnkilling and camping, getting frustrated on it. Wouldn't buy the game if it was for the beta but I know there will be some good maps as well. Well, atleast what I looked caspian


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2015, Project Reality.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1