Is this hardcoded? - Page 2

AnRK · 08-22-2007, 09:02 AM

Speaking of the whole hardcoded thing have the developers, or any developers for that matter, sent a nice polite letter to EAs legal department requesting that they might let them edit their engine to a slightly more intense extent? Or would that kinda thing get shot down straight off?

SNIPERxWOLFxGB · 08-22-2007, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexLax

thats the spirit!

hahhah

[R-MOD]Wasteland · 08-22-2007, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnRK

Speaking of the whole hardcoded thing have the developers, or any developers for that matter, sent a nice polite letter to EAs legal department requesting that they might let them edit their engine to a slightly more intense extent? Or would that kinda thing get shot down straight off?

How would you edit the .exe without the source code?

Also, the mods and devs are going to start handing out warnings soon for threads (especially suggestions) that don't adequately describe the topic (especially the suggestion) in the title. Just a heads up.

~~ArmedDrunk&Angry~~ · 08-22-2007, 11:46 AM

And, the warning will come only via e-mail so if your spam filter catches it you won't even know that you have been warned until you earn enough points to be banned for a week.
This idea might work as a paradrop platform where the helo remains in the air and the gaps between the 3 different vehicles would not be visible from the ground and all three vehicles were coded to follow each other but not touch.
On the other hand that sounds like a lot of work for very little benefit.

[R-DEV]bosco · 08-22-2007, 11:47 AM

You can run around in a flying Osprey without getting killed, strangely enough...

BlakeJr · 08-22-2007, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmedDrunk&Angry

And, the warning will come only via e-mail so if your spam filter catches it you won't even know that you have been warned until you earn enough points to be banned for a week.
This idea might work as a paradrop platform where the helo remains in the air and the gaps between the 3 different vehicles would not be visible from the ground and all three vehicles were coded to follow each other but not touch.
On the other hand that sounds like a lot of work for very little benefit.

I beg your pardon but who told you the warnings were just emailed and not sent as a PM as well?

As far as I know, members getting a warning will receive both a PM AND an email.
I can warn you and you'll find out first hand?

[R-CON]77SiCaRiO77 · 08-22-2007, 01:35 PM

i remember that DCX made a c130 capable of transport 2 hummves by ading a material that didnt make damage to the objects or something like that , but that was for bf1942 :P

echo · 08-22-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]bosco

You can run around in a flying Osprey without getting killed, strangely enough...

Interesting. Couldn't this be implemented in other vehicles? Such as the Merlin etc and that Chinese one!

However I'm guessing it's a totally different thing!

[R-DEV]Masaq · 08-22-2007, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]bosco

You can run around in a flying Osprey without getting killed, strangely enough...

Does that work if the back door opens, or do all the bodies fly out a lá merlin?

lonelyjew · 08-22-2007, 04:35 PM

What's wrong with how the Merlin flies? It's not perfect but it's functional.

08-22-2007, 09:02 AM	#11
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 United Kingdom Location: Near Leeds Posts: 1,659	Speaking of the whole hardcoded thing have the developers, or any developers for that matter, sent a nice polite letter to EAs legal department requesting that they might let them edit their engine to a slightly more intense extent? Or would that kinda thing get shot down straight off?
	I'm a PC! And I use a badly written Microsoft operating system like the vast majority of PC users thus discrediting your individuality based retaliation to Apple marketing.

08-22-2007, 04:35 PM	#20
lonelyjew Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,764	What's wrong with how the Merlin flies? It's not perfect but it's functional.
lonelyjew Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,764	Thanks luizinhuu for the find People are hopelessly ignorant of their own ignorance. -Me

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-22-2007, 11:46 AM	#14
~~ArmedDrunk&Angry~~ Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Long Island Posts: 6,969	And, the warning will come only via e-mail so if your spam filter catches it you won't even know that you have been warned until you earn enough points to be banned for a week. This idea might work as a paradrop platform where the helo remains in the air and the gaps between the 3 different vehicles would not be visible from the ground and all three vehicles were coded to follow each other but not touch. On the other hand that sounds like a lot of work for very little benefit.

08-22-2007, 11:47 AM	#15
[R-DEV]bosco PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2006 Germany Posts: 11,530	You can run around in a flying Osprey without getting killed, strangely enough...

08-22-2007, 01:35 PM	#17
[R-CON]77SiCaRiO77 PR Contributor Join Date: May 2006 Spain Posts: 3,689	i remember that DCX made a c130 capable of transport 2 hummves by ading a material that didnt make damage to the objects or something like that , but that was for bf1942 :P

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links