Will claymores be back in 0.7?? - Page 3

Berry[13thmeu] · 08-18-2007, 07:22 AM

if they put clays back in i sure hope they make them realistic killing power wise.

200 ball barings will tear through gobs of people up to about 20 meters when directed by HE.

NickO · 08-18-2007, 07:29 AM

I remember getting 2 of my squad members to sit in the side seats of the PELA chopper in 0.5 on Mao valley just dropping the claymores over enemy flags

Cleared alot of flags that way.

ZaZZo · 08-18-2007, 07:32 AM

Bring teh gaymores back! I loved them in .5, saved my arse when I was empty on G3 ammo a couple of times.

hall0 · 08-18-2007, 08:07 AM

Yeah Clamores in PR were realy good but in BF2 i hate them.

[BF2]Bonsai · 08-18-2007, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickO

I remember getting 2 of my squad members to sit in the side seats of the PELA chopper in 0.5 on Mao valley just dropping the claymores over enemy flags

Cleared alot of flags that way.

Yeah!! Airminig 4 teh win!!

Ecko · 08-18-2007, 08:53 AM

I think both engineers and SF should get 'em. Why should they be limited to one class? Both of them suit having them in there personal armory. SF because they are ment to operate behind enemies lines using sabotage and ambush techniques, engineers as they are ment to create defenses among other things. So both would be suited to have them.

Rusty1986 · 08-18-2007, 09:07 AM

I think claymores would suit spec ops rather than engies. This would increase the use of spec ops acting as spotters for snipers too. With his M4, binos, a couple of claymores (proximity or remote) and then remote detonated SLAMs (which will hopefully be able to run on seperate frequencies so they can be blown individually...), the spec ops will be a favourite comrade for snipers and also have increased ability in his sabotage missions.

I know the rifleman/support may still be preferred as spotters as they carry ammo, but the spec ops to me seems far more realistic, being light and agile (no clumsy helmet or body armour) The spec ops character looks the part and with these added claymores will certainly be more practical.

I do miss the searching of a captured CP for any claymores sneakily hidden. More traps I say! Don't let it get too predictable.

Rusty

nicoliani · 08-18-2007, 10:12 AM

There is more important things to do than running around putting claymores over the field. I don't like them.
If you wanna kill someone shoot him.

Reddish Red · 08-18-2007, 10:14 AM

I find Claymores to be Annoying.

Butt, Add them to SF.. since SF is kinda, well not used.

Expendable Grunt · 08-18-2007, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reddish Red

I find Claymores to be Annoying.

Butt, Add them to SF.. since SF is kinda, well not used.

Not used my left foot.

08-18-2007, 07:22 AM	#21
Berry[13thmeu] Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 69	if they put clays back in i sure hope they make them realistic killing power wise. 200 ball barings will tear through gobs of people up to about 20 meters when directed by HE.
Berry[13thmeu] Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 69

08-18-2007, 07:32 AM	#23
ZaZZo Join Date: Feb 2007 Denmark Location: Denmark Posts: 1,460	Bring teh gaymores back! I loved them in .5, saved my arse when I was empty on G3 ammo a couple of times.
	Jihadder of 1 spambot I don't want to see a Flaming camel waving his e-penis on the wing of a typhoon. - GrayeKnight

08-18-2007, 08:53 AM	#26
Ecko Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 765	I think both engineers and SF should get 'em. Why should they be limited to one class? Both of them suit having them in there personal armory. SF because they are ment to operate behind enemies lines using sabotage and ambush techniques, engineers as they are ment to create defenses among other things. So both would be suited to have them.
Ecko Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 765	AKA Ecko1987 Beep-Beep-Beep.

08-18-2007, 09:07 AM	#27
Rusty1986 Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 46	I think claymores would suit spec ops rather than engies. This would increase the use of spec ops acting as spotters for snipers too. With his M4, binos, a couple of claymores (proximity or remote) and then remote detonated SLAMs (which will hopefully be able to run on seperate frequencies so they can be blown individually...), the spec ops will be a favourite comrade for snipers and also have increased ability in his sabotage missions. I know the rifleman/support may still be preferred as spotters as they carry ammo, but the spec ops to me seems far more realistic, being light and agile (no clumsy helmet or body armour) The spec ops character looks the part and with these added claymores will certainly be more practical. I do miss the searching of a captured CP for any claymores sneakily hidden. More traps I say! Don't let it get too predictable. Rusty
Rusty1986 Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 46	Dr. Gonzo: "Hey honkies. You guys wanna buy some heroin? Goddamnit, I'm serious. I want to sell you some pure fcking smack! This is the real stuff! I just got back from Vietnam. Ahahaha... scag! I wanna sell you some pure fcking smack... Pure... fck..." Man in Car:* "Goddammit you bastards! Pull over! I'll kill you I'll kill you! Pull over, come on!"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-18-2007, 07:29 AM	#22
NickO Join Date: May 2007 Sweden Location: Gothenburg Posts: 1,233	I remember getting 2 of my squad members to sit in the side seats of the PELA chopper in 0.5 on Mao valley just dropping the claymores over enemy flags Cleared alot of flags that way.

08-18-2007, 08:07 AM	#24
hall0 Join Date: Jun 2007 Germany Location: Bavaria Posts: 1,545	Yeah Clamores in PR were realy good but in BF2 i hate them.

08-18-2007, 10:12 AM	#28
nicoliani Join Date: Jul 2007 Sweden Location: R. Macedonia (Sweden) Posts: 680	There is more important things to do than running around putting claymores over the field. I don't like them. If you wanna kill someone shoot him.

08-18-2007, 10:14 AM	#29
Reddish Red Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Location: Coventry Posts: 533	I find Claymores to be Annoying. Butt, Add them to SF.. since SF is kinda, well not used.

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links