Small back story for the BF2 fight

[Doc]

The way you're describing the MEC, it seems like it needs a name extension.

Middle Eastern Coalition of Petroleum Exporting Countries (MECPEC).

I think that the background also needs more tension that sparks the
creation of the MEC(PEC). Now, I doubt that sectarian violence will end
soon enough, so that provides the basis of the Insurgency.

The way I piece things together, is that the MEC uses whatever profit
they've gained in the past to buy weapons shipments from the Militia
as well as exchanging oil for training from the PLA.

Now we've made a small army. Add in vehicles purchased from
Russia (before entry into the war), and now you've got a mechanized
contingent of forces with proper training.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
After we've made our army, we need a reason for attacking.

• MEC forces seen as a threat, attacked by Coalition forces, or vice versa.
• Iran becomes part of the MECPEC, and BLUFOR invades. (Assuming we go into Iran, of course.)
• They just plain want us gone.

Now that the MEC is attacking/defending, China will come to the aid
of the MEC, probably for the sole reason of protecting its interests.

And now we see the strategy BLUFOR is taking:

• Eliminate the militia, cut off the arms shipments.
• Convince Russia to join us, they will run out of vehicles.
• Take out China, they won't be as well trained.

Colors are fun.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Leo

What Iraq/Afghanistan maps?

Al Basrah, Jabal al Burj, Kashan Oilfields...

The list goes on.

[TexLax]

i second renaming the MEC team to MECPEC

[[R-COM]Outlawz]

Well, we could have US invading Iraq first, since its closest by sea (Persian Gulf) and has a poorly equiped army in comparison to Iran or Saudi Arabia.

Then the Insurgency rises in attempt to drive them off, so while US Forces are fighting in Kashan desert (which is located in Iran), British are dealing with Insurgents in Basrah.

Aghanistan is also invaded to cut off the Chechenyan Militia, supported by MEC, which is fighting Russians, meanwhile the Canadian and British deal with Insurgents in Aghanistan again.

[Hx.Clavdivs]

In marketing; If the horse is dead:

1. Get a bigger whip
2. Claim a dead horse is better than a live one
3. Bundle it with other dead horses and sell them on sale
... ... ...

Mecpec?

[[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909]

TS conversation

"hey dude wanna play some PR"

"Yeah im up for it"

"ok lets go to DVB since its got a few open spots"

"ok im in "

"what side you on"

"MECPEC"

"cricket"

[Hx.Clavdivs]

Player has disconnected from the server.

[[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909]

Originally Posted by Hx.Clavdivs

Player has disconnected from the server.

exactly, whats wrong with just wanting to have fun and play a map, why make PR with a politcal storyline


This is not Call of Duty or Crisis

[Hx.Clavdivs]

This is your gun. There is none like it. This is your enemy. Kill them.

"And all was well."

[Doc]

Even if the MEC get a name change, people will still call them the MEC.
MECPEC is merely a more formal name that coincides with Grunt's
storyline.

We make storylines because not all maps are fun all the time, and
because we have a curiosity on how things came about.

Let me put it to you this way: If you were fighting in a war, and had
absolutely no recollection of any events leading up to the war, would
you not want to know why you are fighting?

Now, of course, it is still a video game. But if you don't want a background story,
then just don't read one. Even so, the best games either
have a great storyline or sandbox gameplay and a mediocre storyline.

[[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909]

isnt this the back story to Basrah
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wAdTKNHnKiM