Apc question?

*spacecadett* · 08-17-2007, 11:30 AM

what i have read the apc spawn capability will be removed just curios if you guys have worked out if the kit request option will be removed from apcs as well?

Expendable Grunt · 08-17-2007, 11:31 AM

Why would it be? It would make it useless...

*spacecadett* · 08-17-2007, 11:38 AM

apcs useless? on the contrary my friend if used correctly deadly and effective!

Farks · 08-17-2007, 11:54 AM

I wanna see APCs with less firepower in the mod, like the Stryker. Why? Because, without the firepower the current APCs has it would force the crew to avoid enemy contact more, and therefore make them better as transport.

[R-DEV]bosco · 08-17-2007, 11:56 AM

Stryker is coming with the US Army in 0.7

.

Farks · 08-17-2007, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]bosco

Stryker is coming with the US Army in 0.7

.

Will MEC and PLA get counterparts?

Hotrod525 · 08-17-2007, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Farks

I wanna see APCs with less firepower in the mod, like the Stryker. Why? Because, without the firepower the current APCs has it would force the crew to avoid enemy contact more, and therefore make them better as transport.

i wanna see APC whit MORE EFFECTIVE firepower!!! Like why APC cannont destroy TANK anymore ? ( 2 single shot even 1 great placed and boom nomore APC...) 25MM is suppose to de some hard damage to T90 and WHY THE HELL T90 can destroy a abram more easiestly

IRL ABRAMS & CHALLENGER are 2praticly unpenetrable tank... not like the T90 Need to be fixed if you want my opinion....

ANYWAYZ if you unarm the APC how the hell we gonna defend our infantry ? is not named Infantry Fighting Vehicule ( or Mechanised Infantry ) for nothing....

eddie · 08-17-2007, 12:16 PM

Is it possible you could use punctuation?

The APCs firepower is fine as it is. I took a T-72 out with around 50 APFSDS (sp?) the other day. That's more than enough firepower.

They aren't going to disarm the APCs..... that would be a stupid idea. They were talking about removing the spawn point. And no, it's not named an IFV, it's an Armoured Personnel Carrier.

The 13th Raptor · 08-17-2007, 12:17 PM

No-one is talking about disarming the apc, but simply limiting its firepower so people will be more inclined to use it to transport and support troops, instead of playing hide and seek around buildings raping infantry spawns.

Farks · 08-17-2007, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrod525

i wanna see APC whit MORE EFFECTIVE firepower!!! Like why APC cannont destroy TANK anymore ? ( 2 single shot even 1 great placed and boom nomore APC...) 25MM is suppose to de some hard damage to T90 and WHY THE HELL T90 can destroy a abram more easiestly

IRL ABRAMS & CHALLENGER are 2praticly unpenetrable tank... not like the T90 Need to be fixed if you want my opinion....

ANYWAYZ if you unarm the APC how the hell we gonna defend our infantry ? is not named Infantry Fighting Vehicule ( or Mechanised Infantry ) for nothing....

APC = Armoured Personal Carrier, not Armoured Anti-Tank Vehicle. If you 'wanna take on enemy MBTs, use an MBT!

08-17-2007, 11:30 AM	#1
spacecadett Join Date: Nov 2006 Finland Location: Finland Posts: 325	Apc question? what i have read the apc spawn capability will be removed just curios if you guys have worked out if the kit request option will be removed from apcs as well?

08-17-2007, 11:31 AM	#2
Expendable Grunt Join Date: Mar 2007 Mongolia Location: Hollywood, MD Posts: 3,657	Why would it be? It would make it useless...
	[DM]Cheomesh -- Clan Leader. I should have 200 posts more than it shows... Slayer of 2 spam bots! Aw dude 4 str 4 stam leather belt? AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

08-17-2007, 11:38 AM	#3
spacecadett Join Date: Nov 2006 Finland Location: Finland Posts: 325	apcs useless? on the contrary my friend if used correctly deadly and effective!

	Last edited by spacecadett; 08-17-2007 at 12:05 PM..

08-17-2007, 11:54 AM	#4
Farks Join Date: Jan 2007 Sweden Location: Hallsberg, Sweden Posts: 474	I wanna see APCs with less firepower in the mod, like the Stryker. Why? Because, without the firepower the current APCs has it would force the crew to avoid enemy contact more, and therefore make them better as transport.
	The language and concepts contained in this post are guaranteed not to cause eternal torment in the place where the guy with the horns and pointed stick conducts his business. - - - Leading NATO 1's armor squad in the PR tournament - sign-up for C7! http://tournament.realitymod.com/

08-17-2007, 12:16 PM	#8
eddie The [R-MOD]s' Poodle Join Date: May 2005 Location: Worcester, England Posts: 4,314	Is it possible you could use punctuation? The APCs firepower is fine as it is. I took a T-72 out with around 50 APFSDS (sp?) the other day. That's more than enough firepower. They aren't going to disarm the APCs..... that would be a stupid idea. They were talking about removing the spawn point. And no, it's not named an IFV, it's an Armoured Personnel Carrier.
	I AM NOT ALLOWED A SIG UNLESS I SHOW I CAN BEHAVE MYSELF

08-17-2007, 11:56 AM	#5
[R-DEV]bosco PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2006 Germany Posts: 11,530	Stryker is coming with the US Army in 0.7 .

08-17-2007, 12:17 PM	#9
The 13th Raptor Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 21	No-one is talking about disarming the apc, but simply limiting its firepower so people will be more inclined to use it to transport and support troops, instead of playing hide and seek around buildings raping infantry spawns.
The 13th Raptor Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 21	Also known as [WOLF]SilentWindOfDoom

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links