|
|||||||
| PR General Discussion : General discussion of the Project Reality modification. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Moderator
![]() Join Date: May 2006
YugoslaviaLocation: Essex, UK
Posts: 4,898
|
Yeah we need a hind. Definetly a hind. Thats what we really need. A hind.
I think we need a Hind! |
|
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
![]() El_Vikingo: Bob_Marley, the level 70 pimp, will satisfy your needs. Many thanks to the Forum's no.1 hottie for the sig pretties. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
PR Operations Lead
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
CanadaPosts: 10,361
|
Aircraft list is something like:
Fighter Attack Jet Fighter carrier borne Attack Jet carrier borne Heavy Transport Helo Light Transport Helo Heavy Attack Helo Light Attack Helo + other unique aircraft that dont fit into those categories (eg: V22, C130, Mi24). Pretty much all those slots are populated, tho right now we have nothing for MEC and PLA carrier borne aircraft. We have a tentative plan to bring the Hind into PR, but probably not in the way y'all are expecting (and not even sure if what we are planning is going to work). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 802
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
PR Contributor
![]() Join Date: May 2006
SpainPosts: 3,687
|
maybe each faction would have a unique type of aircraf.
example , the US has the BH , a fast transport with a good miniguns for defends . the MEC would have the HIND , a slow transport but with attack capabilitys china would have the .... erm......well........ok I KNOW , a mi8 capable of launch a FAV in parachute EDIT: also , see my post of heavy transport http://realitymod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18523 |
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() |
HIND
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
| |
|
Reality is what we take to be true. What we take to be true is what we believe. What we believe is based upon our perceptions. What we perceive depends upon what we look for. What we look for depends on what we think. What we think depends on what we perceive. What we perceive determines what we believe. What we believe determines what we take to be true. What we take to be true is our reality.
|
||
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
United KingdomLocation: Near Leeds
Posts: 1,655
|
Are we gonna see some indigenous carries done for the none-US marines forces? on BF2C we just have Essex clones...
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
PR Operations Lead
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
CanadaPosts: 10,361
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 802
|
Quote:
No no Prob a bit overpowered though. | |
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Blackpool, England, UK
Posts: 269
|
Hmmm, if thats the Case maybe we should start Posting what we believe should be used, well im a Aircraft Nerd who sits at home reading book about Aviation, The Hind is a Great Helicopter i agree but the MEC would not Use it..
The MEC is a modern Faction, do not think just because they live in the Desert they Buy there AKs El Chepo Style, it would be same for there airforce, no Expense spared, there are better alternatives to the Hind out there, pick One |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| aircraft, final, list |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|