|
|||||||
| PR General Discussion : General discussion of the Project Reality modification. |
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
|
I Think project reality should skin a British battleship, seen as the US have a carrier, why can't the british have there own ship?
A know it would be a lot of work...... but it would be Arwsome! |
|
Last edited by Richard_SAS; 01-10-2007 at 05:18 AM..
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: i dont know any more
Posts: 2,042
|
britian doesnt use battle ships anymore.
but the british equverlent of a aircraft carrier would be this one. Ships ahoy i rather the landing craft and more game relevent stuff is dont first rather than a static object with very little point other than to spice up maps oh and welcome to the forums |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
PR Operations Lead
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
These days you have to worrie about planes, missiles, the lot so they would be even more veunerbal to attack today if they where used. | |
|
||
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,081
|
Quote:
uhm, that boat right next to the carrier looks alot like a battleship (atleast the modern equivelant) | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
PR Developer
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
United KingdomPosts: 9,571
|
they are called Destroyers now.
@ Rhino, with new threats come new defence measures. Naval ships have a shitload of protection measures. Scarey ones. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#6 | |
|
PR Operations Lead
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,302
|
Quote:
afaik the US is the only ones with a battleship, but I believe the last 2 of those went out of service last year. wrt a Brit Carrier.... a *lot* of work to use on a few maps largely just to get a little ramp on the end (that does nothing game play wise). we'll be using the US carrier model for any Brit carrier scenarios. | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
I don't think its worth it frankly, the current carrier is hardly moddelled accurately and it really doesn't play a part in the game. I agree with Eggman using the US carrier for the Brit maps, would be a waste of time and manpower otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: germany/bavaria
Posts: 1,836
|
Quote:
the usa have two battleships moothballed, but they weren´t in service for years. they are onlys keept because most times it is just cheaper to bomb a target with long range naval artillery guns, than with high end precision missiles, which do about the same damage ^_^ | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dunfermline, Scotland
Posts: 1,039
|
That's HMS Norfolk: a type 23 frigate.
|
|
What's French for "déjà vu"?
![]() Phil Collins doesn't cut it around here |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 534
|
There NO carrier in BF2!
The essex is an amphib, the nearest UK equivelent would probably be HMS Ocean. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| battleship, british |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|