|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification. |
| View Poll Results: 1 Channel or 2 Channel system? | |||
| 1 channel |
|
215 | 44.61% |
| 2 channels |
|
267 | 55.39% |
| Voters: 482. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#121 |
![]() |
Two channels. Not everyone on the battlefield understands English. With one channel I would be less tempted to use mumble to talk to other players and share information for fear that the enemy might hear.
It would still be 2 channel with your team in the same channel and the other team in their channel. The people in your channel hear what you say when you talk local. The enemy hears some sort of radio sound when you talk in mumble near them. That way the enemy could hear the radio sound but would not know what you said. OR You get 2 local buttons. One talks to everyone and goes 50-60m. The other talks to your team alone and only goes 20-30m. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
Last edited by zebra.actual; 03-20-2010 at 09:36 AM..
|
|
|
#122 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 217
|
yea i agree with zebra that does sound like a good idea
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. The M15A3, weapon of the future Semper Fi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berlin
Posts: 384
|
2. all reasons have been told here. less retards, more teamplay.
@ zebra: Its hard enough to get people to use mumble at all. Although I love mumble with PR and would do pretty much any kind of tiny trick to get the experience to be better, but I do not want to because as I said its hard enough to get the people used to having TWO DIFFERENT OMGZ VOIP buttons and their proper use. |
|
Use mumble nubs.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
|
While I understand the merits of having 2 channels, I have come to realize that a lot of people won't bother with Mumble, except for the L33T servers and players, because it's just such a hassle. Honestly, I am already dealing with enough CTD's trying to get PR up and running that I don't want to risk it to Alt-Tab in and out to be in the right channel or bother an Admin to do it, or God-forbid, get dropped by PB. I'm finding that on a lot of new Mumble servers, where everyone is not necessarily enamoured with Mumble yet, everyone just crowds into the main channel or doesn't use Mumble.
So.... 1 Channel FTW. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
|
While it is not completely accurate, the In-game VOIP already does this, so if this is all you're after, why use Mumble? That's a lackluster at best reason for having two channels, in my opinion, Mumble should be used for Inter-squad communication so there is more Teamwork overall, not just more squad-work. That plus it would be awesome to be able to talk to the enemy, i.e. downed pilots, unarmed soldiers, civies, etc.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
![]() |
1 channel has it's pros, it's nice to be able to talk to and hear the enemy. But it leads to Mumble being used less in combat situations, so I have to say 2 channels are better.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Las Woikas
Posts: 175
|
2 channel system is better. How often does all the soldiers have straight channel to their commander? Not very often think. Besize, Squadleader will have to deliver info and messages between soldiers and commander. That is more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
|
I just want to know why, outside of TG, other servers have trouble getting people to use Mumble. Never played on any European servers like Reality Teamwork or what not though...
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 2,783
|
Quote:
2. RT prioritized mumblers, making more people start using it. Exponential growth and all that. Both communities also have a lot of known players and great teamwork that attracts more players, and these then start using mumble as well. The reason why most other servers do not have a large mumble user base is because they rely more heavily on casual players, they do not have the same strong communities, and they do not advertise or enforce the use of mumble. When we were just starting to use mumble there was such a large portion of the population that thought it was pointless and didn't want to get mumble for no reason whatsoever(Most of which changed their opinion later The only way you get people to use mumble is through having a large portion willingly start using it, advertising it, and enforcing it. | |
|
Make Norway OPFOR! NAO!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. It's your hamster Richard. It's your hamster in the box and it's not breathing. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| mumble, prefer, style |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|