|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
To help us find the cause of performance issues with PR 0.9, we need to collect your information in an organised manner. In the post below, you will find a template for reporting 0.9 performance issues, just simply quote the post below and fill in the gaps.
Note : No other posting is to take place in this thread. Only filling in the template.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
Copy and paste the following template in the code box below into your post:
PHP Code:
System Specifications
BF2 Graphics Settings
1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
|
|
|
|
Last edited by [R-DEV]Rhino; 02-07-2010 at 12:15 AM..
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 270
Location: London
|
System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7 CPU : i7 920 2.66GHz Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Amount of RAM : 6GB Sound Card : Onboard (EX58-UD3R MB) BF2 Graphics Settings Resolution : 1920x1200 Terrain : High Effects : High Geometry : High Texture : High Lighting : High Dynamic Shadows : High Dynamic Light : High Anti-Aliasing : x8 Texture Filtering : High Q1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes, but does not effect gameplay. I had 250 frames on some maps now I mostly have 60-90. So, massive performance drop but unnoticeable. Q2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 9 Q3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. None so far (will edit if I find one) Q4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. n/a Q5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. All so far (will edit if any change) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU: E8400 @ 3.6ghz Graphics Card : GTX 260 core216 896 mb Amount of RAM : 4GB 800mhz DDR2 Sound Card : Diamond XS51 BF2 Graphics Settings Resolution : 1680x1050 Terrain : High Effects : High Geometry : High Texture : High Lighting : High Dynamic Shadows : High Dynamic Light : High Anti-Aliasing : 2x Texture Filtering : High 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 7 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Fallujah West Lashkar Valley Silent Eagle Gaza Strip 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. I have not yet been able to determine this. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. I did not notice any FPS problems on Beirut. |
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
|
System Specifications
* Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 64bit * CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.8Ghz * Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD5890 * Amount of RAM : 4Gb * Sound Card : RealTech HD 7.1 BF2 Graphics Settings * Resolution : 1920x1200 * Terrain : High * Effects : High * Geometry : High * Texture : High * Lighting : High * Dynamic Shadows : High * Dynamic Light :High * Anti-Aliasing : None * Texture Filtering : High 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 8.5 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Fallujah West Lashkar Valley 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. n/a 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 457
Location: Melbourne
|
System Specifications
BF2 Graphics Settings
1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes, specifically on new maps 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 9, with occasional drops is particular areas on newer maps 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Beirut*, Silent Eagle, Lashkar Valley, EDIT: Karbala 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. Large and enterable buildings on Beirut, the corn fields etc in Lashkar Valley (sp?) and around centre of the map on Silent Eagle (a radius of about 100-200m, gets worse if I look at the centre of the map). EDIT: Beirut had an far longer load time compared to other maps when I played it, sitting on 0% for some time. On karbala my framerate was terrible (unplayable, couldn't move) for about a minute after I spawned for the first time. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. All maps not listed in #3 * Note that I played Beirut with the settings indicated in brackets and changed them after the loss in performance ** Also I haven't played any of the new maps asides from the ones listed here. Will post back once I have played more maps/covered more areas |
|
|
Last edited by Ford_Jam; 02-06-2010 at 08:17 AM..
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 734
|
System Specifications
No. 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 9. 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Lashkar, N/A 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. Fields. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. All. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 42
|
System Specifications
Operating System : Win 7 CPU : Q9300 2.5 GHz Graphics Card : 8800GTX 768MB Amount of RAM : 4 GB Sound Card : X-Fi BF2 Graphics Settings Resolution : 1680x1050 Terrain : Low (was high/medium before 0.9) Effects : Low Geometry : Low (was high/medium before 0.9) Texture : Low (was high before 0.9) Lighting : Low (was medium before 0.9) Dynamic Shadows : Off (was low before 0.9) Dynamic Light : Off (was low before 0.9) Anti-Aliasing : 0x (was 2/4 before 0.9) Texture Filtering : Low (was high/medium before 0.9) 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 3 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Gaza Beach (absolutely worst), Beirut, Dragon Fly 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. Cities. Gaza Beach is mostly just pure hell. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. Will have to get back on this one. Haven't played any old maps yet. I will edit this as I play some more. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 52
Location: stockholm
|
BF2 Graphics Settings
1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. Before 10 now 6 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. beirut, gaza beach, fallujaha, that new valley map 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. edge of the maps looking in to the citys and overal low fps when in the citys 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.[/QUOTE] yamalia, havnt played all the maps |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,093
Location: kotka
|
System Specifications
***also lowered every settings low but no change*** 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? YES 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 3 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. qwai river,lashkar valley,korengal,beirut,fallujah,dragon fly,gaza beach,iron ridge,(in city) EDIT:even in karbala have fps problems, 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. just looking towards the city i get 15 fps 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. asad khal,muttrah,archer,yamalia,kashan,barracuda,almos t every old maps works fine |
|
|
Last edited by maarit; 03-19-2010 at 06:57 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| performance, project, reality, reporting, template |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|