project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
27 Aug 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2010, 07:22 AM   #1
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Jaymz's Avatar
Exclamation Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

To help us find the cause of performance issues with PR 0.9, we need to collect your information in an organised manner. In the post below, you will find a template for reporting 0.9 performance issues, just simply quote the post below and fill in the gaps.

Note : No other posting is to take place in this thread. Only filling in the template.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Jaymz is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 07:22 AM   #2
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Jaymz's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

Copy and paste the following template in the code box below into your post:
PHP Code:
[B]System Specifications[/B]
[LIST][*]
Operating System : [*]CPU : [*]Graphics Card : [*]Amount of RAM : [*]Sound Card : [/LIST]
[
B]BF2 Graphics Settings[/B]
[LIST][*]
Resolution :[/LIST][LIST][*]Terrain : [*]Effects :[*]Geometry :[*]Texture : [*]Lighting : [*]Dynamic Shadows :[*]Dynamic Light :[*]Anti-Aliasing :[*]Texture Filtering :[/LIST]

1. Have you noticed a significant performance [B]decrease[/Bfrom 0.87 -> 0.9?



2. On a scale of 1 to 10how would you rate your performance in 0.9



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the [B]worst[/Bperformance.



4. From the maps mentioned abovestate which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most



5. Name any maps that you have [B]no[/Bperformance issues with



System Specifications
  • Operating System :
  • CPU :
  • Graphics Card :
  • Amount of RAM :
  • Sound Card :

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution :
  • Terrain :
  • Effects :
  • Geometry :
  • Texture :
  • Lighting :
  • Dynamic Shadows :
  • Dynamic Light :
  • Anti-Aliasing :
  • Texture Filtering :


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Jaymz is offline
Last edited by [R-DEV]Rhino; 02-07-2010 at 12:15 AM..
Old 02-06-2010, 07:36 AM   #3
LudacrisKill

LudacrisKill's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7
CPU : i7 920 2.66GHz
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Amount of RAM : 6GB
Sound Card : Onboard (EX58-UD3R MB)

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1920x1200
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : x8
Texture Filtering : High


Q1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, but does not effect gameplay. I had 250 frames on some maps now I mostly have 60-90. So, massive performance drop but unnoticeable.

Q2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9

Q3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

None so far (will edit if I find one)

Q4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

n/a

Q5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All so far (will edit if any change)
LudacrisKill is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 07:43 AM   #4
Motosaki
Guest
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU: E8400 @ 3.6ghz
Graphics Card : GTX 260 core216 896 mb
Amount of RAM : 4GB 800mhz DDR2
Sound Card : Diamond XS51


BF2 Graphics Settings


Resolution : 1680x1050
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 2x
Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley
Silent Eagle
Gaza Strip


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

I have not yet been able to determine this.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

I did not notice any FPS problems on Beirut.
Old 02-06-2010, 07:46 AM   #5
DoubleCore
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 64bit
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.8Ghz
* Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD5890
* Amount of RAM : 4Gb
* Sound Card : RealTech HD 7.1


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1920x1200

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light :High
* Anti-Aliasing : None
* Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8.5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

n/a

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
n/a
DoubleCore is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 07:47 AM   #6
Ford_Jam

Ford_Jam's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Win XP 32bit
  • CPU : E2160 @ 1.8ghz
  • Graphics Card : Nvidia 8600gt 256mb
  • Amount of RAM : 2gb
  • Sound Card : Onboard sound

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1680x1050
  • Terrain : High (High*)
  • Effects : high (High*)
  • Geometry : high (High*)
  • Texture : medium (High*)
  • Lighting : low (Medium*)
  • Dynamic Shadows : off (low*)
  • Dynamic Light : off (low*)
  • Anti-Aliasing : 8x (4x*)
  • Texture Filtering : high (High*)


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, specifically on new maps


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9, with occasional drops is particular areas on newer maps


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Beirut*, Silent Eagle, Lashkar Valley,
EDIT: Karbala


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Large and enterable buildings on Beirut, the corn fields etc in Lashkar Valley (sp?) and around centre of the map on Silent Eagle (a radius of about 100-200m, gets worse if I look at the centre of the map).
EDIT: Beirut had an far longer load time compared to other maps when I played it, sitting on 0% for some time.
On karbala my framerate was terrible (unplayable, couldn't move) for about a minute after I spawned for the first time.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All maps not listed in #3

* Note that I played Beirut with the settings indicated in brackets and changed them after the loss in performance
** Also I haven't played any of the new maps asides from the ones listed here. Will post back once I have played more maps/covered more areas
Ford_Jam is offline
Last edited by Ford_Jam; 02-06-2010 at 08:17 AM..
Old 02-06-2010, 07:51 AM   #7
Narco
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 32-Bit
  • CPU : AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 Ghz
  • Graphics Card : ATI Radeon 4890
  • Amount of RAM : 4GB
  • Sound Card : Onboard - VIA HD or something.
BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1440x900 75Mhz
  • Terrain : High
  • Effects : High
  • Geometry : High
  • Texture : Medium
  • Lighting : High
  • Dynamic Shadows : High
  • Dynamic Light : High
  • Anti-Aliasing : Off
  • Texture Filtering : High
1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

No.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Lashkar, N/A

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Fields.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Narco is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 07:57 AM   #8
roob
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
Operating System : Win 7
CPU : Q9300 2.5 GHz
Graphics Card : 8800GTX 768MB
Amount of RAM : 4 GB
Sound Card : X-Fi

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050
Terrain : Low (was high/medium before 0.9)
Effects : Low
Geometry : Low (was high/medium before 0.9)
Texture : Low (was high before 0.9)
Lighting : Low (was medium before 0.9)
Dynamic Shadows : Off (was low before 0.9)
Dynamic Light : Off (was low before 0.9)
Anti-Aliasing : 0x (was 2/4 before 0.9)
Texture Filtering : Low (was high/medium before 0.9)


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach (absolutely worst), Beirut, Dragon Fly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Cities. Gaza Beach is mostly just pure hell.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Will have to get back on this one. Haven't played any old maps yet.


I will edit this as I play some more.
roob is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 07:57 AM   #9
frankwilliam
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

  • Operating System : Vista 32
  • CPU : intel core2 duo
  • Graphics Card : 8800gts 512mb
  • Amount of RAM : 2gig
  • Sound Card : x-fi soundblaster (?)

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1440x900
  • Terrain : low
  • Effects :low
  • Geometry :low
  • Texture : low
  • Lighting : low
  • Dynamic Shadows : off
  • Dynamic Light ff
  • Anti-Aliasing :4x
  • Texture Filtering ff


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Before 10 now 6

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

beirut, gaza beach, fallujaha, that new valley map

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

edge of the maps looking in to the citys and overal low fps when in the citys

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.[/QUOTE]
yamalia, havnt played all the maps
frankwilliam is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:01 AM   #10
maarit
Supporting Member

maarit's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System :XP Professional
  • CPU :AMD Athlon 3000+
  • Graphics Card :nvidia geforce 6800gt
  • Amount of RAM :2g
  • Sound Card :nvidia mcp2
BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution :1024x768
  • Terrain :medium
  • Effects :medium
  • Geometry :high
  • Texture :medium
  • Lighting :medium
  • Dynamic Shadows ff
  • Dynamic Light ff
  • Anti-Aliasing ff
  • Texture Filtering ff

***also lowered every settings low but no change***

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
YES


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
3


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
qwai river,lashkar valley,korengal,beirut,fallujah,dragon fly,gaza beach,iron ridge,(in city)


EDIT:even in karbala have fps problems,

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
just looking towards the city i get 15 fps


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
asad khal,muttrah,archer,yamalia,kashan,barracuda,almos t every old maps works fine
maarit is offline
Last edited by maarit; 03-19-2010 at 06:57 PM..
Closed Thread


Tags
performance, project, reality, reporting, template
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.