project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
24 Oct 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2010, 10:30 AM   #31
Axis_Sniper
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows Vista 32-bit
* CPU : AMD Phenom Quad-core 9500 2.20 Ghz
* Graphics Card : Radeon HD 4670 512MB
* Amount of RAM : 3GB
* Sound Card : Intergrated soundcard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1900x1080 @ 75HZ

* Terrain : Medium
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : Medium
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : Off
* Dynamic Light : Low
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Definitely


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
1.5


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Haven't played all of them, but Dragon Fly in the city and Lashkuur Valley in general. Insurgency maps are the worst offenders


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Cities mostly, as well as when a large number of players are in a small area


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Kashan doesn't have any problems on my end, performance-wise.
Axis_Sniper is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 10:50 AM   #32
UKrealplayER666

UKrealplayER666's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : XP Home SP3
  • CPU : P4 3ghz
  • Graphics Card : 7600gs
  • Amount of RAM : 1gb
  • Sound Card :Onboard Realtek

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1024x768 @60hz
  • Terrain : Med
  • Effects : Med
  • Geometry : Med
  • Texture : Low
  • Lighting : Med
  • Dynamic Shadows : Off
  • Dynamic Light : Off
  • Anti-Aliasing : None
  • Texture Filtering : High (for some unknown reason)


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Significant is an understatement, its Catastrophicly Horrific, Im talking from 30fps down to 10fps max!

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

0.5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Lashkar Valley 5-10 fps max
Pretty much all the maps are terrible


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Any time i look onto the map my fps drops like a stone, External applications like Ventrillo crash more often then not aswell

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

When i run everything on low then they are all ok, but the old maps are the best such as kashan, runs at 30fps, but i dont want to run them on low, takes away what little emersion i can get.
UKrealplayER666 is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:05 AM   #33
LunaticMadness
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Windows 7 64bit
  • CPU : Phenom II X4 955 3.2GHz
  • Graphics Card : Sapphire 4870 1Gb Vapor X
  • Amount of RAM : 4Gb DDR2 800MHz
  • Sound Card : NA

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1920x1080
  • Terrain : High
  • Effects : High
  • Geometry : High
  • Texture : High
  • Lighting : High
  • Dynamic Shadows : High
  • Dynamic Light : High
  • Anti-Aliasing : 4x
  • Texture Filtering : 4x


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
3


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Fallujah, Gaza Beach, Beirut, Korengal (Most maps lag for me when I face a certain direction)


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Looking into busy areas.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Haven't played many other maps since 909 release, I will add more info once I play other maps.
LunaticMadness is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:13 AM   #34
SilverJohn
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows Vista
CPU : AMD Dual Core 2.61ghz
Graphics Card : Nvidia 8800 GTX 800mgb
Amount of RAM : 2GB
Sound Card : Soundblaster

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1080x720
Terrain : High
Effects : medium
Geometry : medium
Texture : medium
Lighting : medium
Dynamic Shadows : low
Dynamic Light : medium
Anti-Aliasing : 8
Texture Filtering : 0


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? - Usually id average about 55 frames now im down to 25 on average


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 6


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Gaza, Beirut and qwai are the only maps ive played that had issues

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. Mainly got low fps when looking into the citys.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. Silent Eagle, Yamalia, Iron Ridge.
SilverJohn is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:14 AM   #35
rucsok

rucsok's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 32bit
* CPU : C2D E4500 2.2ghz
* Graphics Card : Geforce 8600gt
* Amount of RAM : 2gb ddr2 667mhz
* Sound Card : NA


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1024×768
* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : 4x
* Texture Filtering : 4x



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
2


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Silent Eagle, Gaza beach, Beirut


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Even when it shows 30-50 fps, the game stutters like hell when i rotate or move any direction



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Yamalia, Kashan Desert
rucsok is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:16 AM   #36
theiceman

theiceman's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

Operating System : Winows 7 ultimate 64 bit
CPU : amd dual core 3.0ghz
Graphics Card :GeForce 9500 gt
Amount of RAM : 4gb
Sound Card : xfi sound blaster...idk

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1400x900
Terrain : high
Effects : high
Geometry : high
Texture : high
Lighting : high
Dynamic Shadows : high
Dynamic Light : high
Anti-Aliasing : 0
Texture Filtering : high


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

no, went from vista 32 to windoes 64 so it actually increased


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

none really, but ahvent played all of them

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

n/a

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

all so far


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Through Superior Firepower
theiceman is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:19 AM   #37
Swat54swe

Swat54swe's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specs
* OS: Windows vista
* CPU: Intel quad core 9300 2.5 GHZ.
* Video Card: 9600 gt 512mb
* RAM: 4GB
* Sound Card: Dont know

Graphical Settings
* Resolution: 1400 x something xD
* Terrain: High
* Effects: high
* Geometry: high
* Texture: medium
* Lighting: high
* Dynamic Shadows: high
* Dynamic Light: high
* Anti-Aliasing:
* Texture Filtering: high


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
7, around 25-90 fps


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Dragon fly and Lashkar Valley!

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
busy areas.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Dont know haven't played pr 0.9 so much.
Swat54swe is offline
Last edited by Swat54swe; 02-07-2010 at 03:02 PM..
Old 02-06-2010, 11:20 AM   #38
Arquin

Arquin's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP
* CPU : AMD Phenom II X2 550 (3.1GHz)
* Graphics Card : ENGTX275
* Amount of RAM : 4GB
* Sound Card : Some Realtek HD audio


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1680XDunno

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : X8
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Wouldn't say significant. Medium.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Probably around 7


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Fallujah West, Lashkar Valley, ??Siege at Ochamchira??


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
City in Fallujah, harbor of Ochamchira, and wide landscape view ares of Lashkar. (On the hills)


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Haven't played that much, but maps like Muttrah and Beirut don't seem to give me that many problems.
Arquin is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 11:33 AM   #39
CC-Marley

CC-Marley's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

.............
CC-Marley is offline
Last edited by CC-Marley; 02-06-2010 at 11:37 AM.. Reason: wrong place to post a question
Old 02-06-2010, 11:42 AM   #40
Desertfox287
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : XP SP3 x32 bit
* CPU : AMD64x2+4000 2.1Ghz@2.31Ghz
* Graphics Card : Nvidia 8500GT
* Amount of RAM :1Gig DDR2-800
* Sound Card : Creative media sound blaster


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1920x1080

* Terrain :Low
* Effects :Low
* Geometry :Low
* Texture :Med/High
* Lighting :Low
* Dynamic Shadows :Off
* Dynamic Light :Off
* Anti-Aliasing :x2
* Texture Filtering :Low



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Nothing significant, but I used to lag anyway, but it was still playable easily.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
-8, I still occasionally get lag


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
-Will edit later, but all seem o run equally


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
-N/A


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Beirut
Desertfox287 is offline
Last edited by Desertfox287; 02-07-2010 at 10:12 PM..
Closed Thread


Tags
performance, project, reality, reporting, template
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.