Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template - Page 24

John-117 · 08-08-2010, 07:49 AM

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32 bit)
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Extreme 2.53 GHz
* Graphics Card : NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
* Amount of RAM : 2.5 GB
* Sound Card : Onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1920x1200
* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : x8
* Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

New PC

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

NA

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

NA

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

When I look towards smoke that isnt player controlled my fraps drop from 80ish to 10 ish

Tarranauha200 · 09-25-2010, 05:43 PM

Please remove this message moderators, I just failed

Valleyforge3946 · 10-19-2010, 03:13 PM

Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
AMD Anthlon 64 5600+ x2 OC'd at 3.2GHZ each.
Galaxy Geforce 240 1024Mb Gddr5 OC'd
5GB DDR2 ram
Res= 1440*900@60Hz
Terrain High
Texture High
All HIGH Setting
ANistropic Filtering Forced 16X
Anti-Aliasing 4X
100% draw distance

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

YEs i have.
2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
In 0.95 i'd say 6.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Beirut, Gaza Beach,Karbala

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
In the city's and whenever i am near a BTR-80 or BMP-3. i drop from 45FPS to 12.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Operation Archer

Element-X_IV · 10-19-2010, 03:33 PM

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows XP Professional 32-bit
CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
Graphics Card : ATI HD 4850 Sonic
Amount of RAM : 3 Gb DDR2 @ 800mhz
Sound Card : On-board

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050 60hz
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 2x
Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley
Dragon fly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Fallujah, areas which lag for me the most are areas where those huge smoke clouds are, or whenever I turn to an area where they are visible to me my FPS drops from 45 to 20
The same lag is also noticed when I place that type of smoke in maps in the editor.

Lashkar, Not sure, mainly anywhere firefights are taking place my FPS drops from 45 to 35.

Dragon Fly, I just get about 40 FPS average on there, specifically when inside the city and when looking at large forested areas.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All these maps can run 50-100 fps for me, maps that run under 50 are not incl.

Silent Eagle
Kashan
Beirut
Al Basra
Korengal
Asad
Kokan
Wanda Shan
Qinling
Qwai
Muttrah
Kozelsk
Archer
Karbala
Gaza
Iron Eagle
Yamalia

G.Drew · 10-19-2010, 03:52 PM

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32bit)
CPU : Intel Core i5 750
Graphics Card : Nvidia Geoforce GTX 260
Amount of RAM : 2Gb
Sound Card : Onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1280x1024

Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : Off
Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
1.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
No specific ones, either PC locks up when entering game or map CTDs.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
N/A

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Managed to barely play Lashkar Valley and Burning sands for a few mins upon release.

Imchicken1 · 10-19-2010, 04:11 PM

Should this thread not be updated to .9 --> .95?

BloodBane611 · 10-19-2010, 05:14 PM

We are now on .95, if the DEV team desires a new thread on overall performance they will make one. Locking this one, as it is entirely out of date

08-08-2010, 07:49 AM	#231
John-117 Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,287 Qatar Location: Doha	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template System Specifications * Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32 bit) * CPU : Intel Core 2 Extreme 2.53 GHz * Graphics Card : NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M * Amount of RAM : 2.5 GB * Sound Card : Onboard BF2 Graphics Settings * Resolution :1920x1200 * Terrain : High * Effects : High * Geometry : High * Texture : High * Lighting : High * Dynamic Shadows : High * Dynamic Light : High * Anti-Aliasing : x8 * Texture Filtering : High 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? New PC 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 9 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. NA 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. NA 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. When I look towards smoke that isnt player controlled my fraps drop from 80ish to 10 ish
	Proud Member of [ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ] To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. thanks rampo93
	Last edited by John-117; 08-10-2010 at 11:07 AM..

09-25-2010, 05:43 PM	#232
Tarranauha200 Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 943 Finland Location: Winland	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template Please remove this message moderators, I just failed

10-19-2010, 03:13 PM	#233
Valleyforge3946 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 204 United States of America Location: Mesa	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit AMD Anthlon 64 5600+ x2 OC'd at 3.2GHZ each. Galaxy Geforce 240 1024Mb Gddr5 OC'd 5GB DDR2 ram Res= 1440*900@60Hz Terrain High Texture High All HIGH Setting ANistropic Filtering Forced 16X Anti-Aliasing 4X 100% draw distance 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? YEs i have. 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. In 0.95 i'd say 6. 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Beirut, Gaza Beach,Karbala 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. In the city's and whenever i am near a BTR-80 or BMP-3. i drop from 45FPS to 12. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. Operation Archer
	SiŁeńŤĤŨňŤeŘ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-19-2010, 03:33 PM	#234
Element-X_IV Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 112 Philippines	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template System Specifications Operating System : Windows XP Professional 32-bit CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz Graphics Card : ATI HD 4850 Sonic Amount of RAM : 3 Gb DDR2 @ 800mhz Sound Card : On-board BF2 Graphics Settings Resolution : 1680x1050 60hz Terrain : High Effects : High Geometry : High Texture : Medium Lighting : High Dynamic Shadows : High Dynamic Light : High Anti-Aliasing : 2x Texture Filtering : High 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 8 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. Fallujah West Lashkar Valley Dragon fly 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. Fallujah, areas which lag for me the most are areas where those huge smoke clouds are, or whenever I turn to an area where they are visible to me my FPS drops from 45 to 20 The same lag is also noticed when I place that type of smoke in maps in the editor. Lashkar, Not sure, mainly anywhere firefights are taking place my FPS drops from 45 to 35. Dragon Fly, I just get about 40 FPS average on there, specifically when inside the city and when looking at large forested areas. 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. All these maps can run 50-100 fps for me, maps that run under 50 are not incl. Silent Eagle Kashan Beirut Al Basra Korengal Asad Kokan Wanda Shan Qinling Qwai Muttrah Kozelsk Archer Karbala Gaza Iron Eagle Yamalia
Element-X_IV Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 112 Philippines

10-19-2010, 03:52 PM	#235
G.Drew Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 4,454 United Kingdom Location: Hamilton, Scotland	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template System Specifications Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32bit) CPU : Intel Core i5 750 Graphics Card : Nvidia Geoforce GTX 260 Amount of RAM : 2Gb Sound Card : Onboard BF2 Graphics Settings Resolution : 1280x1024 Terrain : High Effects : High Geometry : High Texture : High Lighting : High Dynamic Shadows : High Dynamic Light : High Anti-Aliasing : Off Texture Filtering : High 1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? Yes. 2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9. 1. 3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance. No specific ones, either PC locks up when entering game or map CTDs. 4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. N/A 5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. Managed to barely play Lashkar Valley and Burning sands for a few mins upon release.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....

10-19-2010, 04:11 PM	#236
Imchicken1 Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 500 Canada Location: Vancouver, BC	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template Should this thread not be updated to .9 --> .95?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I won't cluck for you

10-19-2010, 05:14 PM	#237
BloodBane611 Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 6,574 United States of America Location: The Snowy Northeast	Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template We are now on .95, if the DEV team desires a new thread on overall performance they will make one. Locking this one, as it is entirely out of date
	[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links