project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
23 Oct 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2010, 07:49 AM   #231
John-117

John-117's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32 bit)
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Extreme 2.53 GHz
* Graphics Card : NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
* Amount of RAM : 2.5 GB
* Sound Card : Onboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1920x1200
* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : x8
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

New PC

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

NA

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

NA

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

When I look towards smoke that isnt player controlled my fraps drop from 80ish to 10 ish

Proud Member of [
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

thanks rampo93
John-117 is offline
Last edited by John-117; 08-10-2010 at 11:07 AM..
Old 09-25-2010, 05:43 PM   #232
Tarranauha200

Tarranauha200's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

Please remove this message moderators, I just failed
Tarranauha200 is offline
Old 10-19-2010, 03:13 PM   #233
Valleyforge3946

Valleyforge3946's Avatar
Send a message via Yahoo to Valleyforge3946 Send a message via Skype™ to Valleyforge3946
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
AMD Anthlon 64 5600+ x2 OC'd at 3.2GHZ each.
Galaxy Geforce 240 1024Mb Gddr5 OC'd
5GB DDR2 ram
Res= 1440*900@60Hz
Terrain High
Texture High
All HIGH Setting
ANistropic Filtering Forced 16X
Anti-Aliasing 4X
100% draw distance

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

YEs i have.
2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
In 0.95 i'd say 6.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Beirut, Gaza Beach,Karbala

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
In the city's and whenever i am near a BTR-80 or BMP-3. i drop from 45FPS to 12.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Operation Archer

SiŁeńŤĤŨňŤeŘ

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Valleyforge3946 is offline
Old 10-19-2010, 03:33 PM   #234
Element-X_IV

Element-X_IV's Avatar
Send a message via Yahoo to Element-X_IV
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows XP Professional 32-bit
CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
Graphics Card : ATI HD 4850 Sonic
Amount of RAM : 3 Gb DDR2 @ 800mhz
Sound Card : On-board

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050 60hz
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 2x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley
Dragon fly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Fallujah, areas which lag for me the most are areas where those huge smoke clouds are, or whenever I turn to an area where they are visible to me my FPS drops from 45 to 20
The same lag is also noticed when I place that type of smoke in maps in the editor.

Lashkar, Not sure, mainly anywhere firefights are taking place my FPS drops from 45 to 35.

Dragon Fly, I just get about 40 FPS average on there, specifically when inside the city and when looking at large forested areas.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All these maps can run 50-100 fps for me, maps that run under 50 are not incl.


Silent Eagle
Kashan
Beirut
Al Basra
Korengal
Asad
Kokan
Wanda Shan
Qinling
Qwai
Muttrah
Kozelsk
Archer
Karbala
Gaza
Iron Eagle
Yamalia
Element-X_IV is offline
Old 10-19-2010, 03:52 PM   #235
G.Drew

G.Drew's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to G.Drew
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Windows XP SP3 (32bit)
  • CPU : Intel Core i5 750
  • Graphics Card : Nvidia Geoforce GTX 260
  • Amount of RAM : 2Gb
  • Sound Card : Onboard
BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1280x1024
  • Terrain : High
  • Effects : High
  • Geometry : High
  • Texture : High
  • Lighting : High
  • Dynamic Shadows : High
  • Dynamic Light : High
  • Anti-Aliasing : Off
  • Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
1.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
No specific ones, either PC locks up when entering game or map CTDs.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
N/A

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Managed to barely play Lashkar Valley and Burning sands for a few mins upon release.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
G.Drew is offline
Old 10-19-2010, 04:11 PM   #236
Imchicken1

Imchicken1's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

Should this thread not be updated to .9 --> .95?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


I won't cluck for you
Imchicken1 is offline
Old 10-19-2010, 05:14 PM   #237
BloodBane611
Supporting Member

BloodBane611's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

We are now on .95, if the DEV team desires a new thread on overall performance they will make one. Locking this one, as it is entirely out of date



[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"

BloodBane611 is offline
Closed Thread


Tags
performance, project, reality, reporting, template
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.