project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
22 Sep 2014, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2010, 08:02 AM   #11
STORM-Mama

STORM-Mama's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Windows Vista 32
  • CPU : AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core 2.30 GHz
  • Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD5870
  • Amount of RAM : 4 GB
  • Sound Card : ATI High Definition Audio Device

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1440x900 (and have tried with both igher and lower without any result)
  • Terrain : Medium
  • Effects : Medium
  • Geometry : Medium
  • Texture : Medium
  • Lighting : Medium
  • Dynamic Shadows : Medium
  • Dynamic Light : Medium
  • Anti-Aliasing : 2x
  • Texture Filtering : Medium
(have tried lowering all of them without any notable results)



1. Yes.

2. Would give it a 3.

3. Fallujah, Gaza Beach, Lashkar Valley and Beirut.

4. Standing in the USMC main on Fallujah and slowly rotating will make the FPS dance like a crazy Cossack. Facing towards the centre of the map (slightly northeast) will drop it down to ~15. When I turn around and face south it will jump to ~100 instantly. Same thing happen on other maps when facing towards the centre. And everywhere it is stuttering like crazy.

5. The FPS is jumping around like crazy on every map. Even on a map like Asad Khal it will switch from 90-100 to 20-30 just depending on the direction I am facing. On Kashan, Silent Eagle (the village being the exception) and Operation Archer (village an exception here as well) it wasn't as dramatic, though.
STORM-Mama is offline
Last edited by STORM-Mama; 02-06-2010 at 08:44 AM..
Old 02-06-2010, 08:02 AM   #12
MonkeySoldier

MonkeySoldier's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Windows 7 32 bit Professional
  • CPU : Intel T6670 2.2Ghz
  • Graphics Card : ATi Mobility HD4330 512
  • Amount of RAM : 3GB
  • Sound Card : n/a

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1366*768
  • Terrain : Medium
  • Effects : Medium
  • Geometry : Low
  • Texture : Medium
  • Lighting : Low
  • Dynamic Shadows : Low
  • Dynamic Light : Low
  • Anti-Aliasing : Off
  • Texture Filtering : Low


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
4


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Yamalia (when zoomed in)
Lashkar Valley
Silent Eagle



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Everywhere


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Kashan
Other previous maps that are un-edited


P.S. Jaymz, sticky?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
MonkeySoldier is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:09 AM   #13
Brummy

Brummy's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Brummy
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7
CPU : Intel i7 965
Graphics Card : HD5970
Amount of RAM : 16GB
Sound Card : Creative x-Fi Gaming

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Slightly longer loading times (10~20s longer)

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

10

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

---

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

---

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All maps are fine, except a few slight fps drops (90~100 fps in Gaza Beach)


--- x --- x --- x --- x --- x ---


System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7
CPU : Intel E8400
Graphics Card : HD4870
Amount of RAM : 4GB
Sound Card : Creative x-Fi Gaming

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Slightly longer loading times

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

North

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All maps are fine, except a few slight fps drops


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Brummy is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:11 AM   #14
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

bosco_'s Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : XP
  • CPU : Core 2 Duo E8400
  • Graphics Card : Nvidia 9800 GX2
  • Amount of RAM : 3 GB
  • Sound Card : Sound Blaster Audigy

BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1920x1080
  • Terrain : High
  • Effects : High
  • Geometry : High
  • Texture : High
  • Lighting : High
  • Dynamic Shadows : High
  • Dynamic Light : High
  • Anti-Aliasing : 8x
  • Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, with alot more CTD due to memory error.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly
Gaza Beach
Yamalia
Iron Ridge

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Grass, zooming in on grass, Woods, Eastern Village on Gaza

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Silent Eagle
Beirut
all other


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
bosco_ is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:13 AM   #15
[EC]DR.NOobFragger

[EC]DR.NOobFragger's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Win Xp 32 bit
* CPU :Phenom II X4 945 3.0Ghz
* Graphics Card :ATI Radeon 5770
* Amount of RAM : 2 GB
* Sound Card :Creative Extreme Audio


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1680x1050 60mhz

* Terrain :high
* Effects :high
* Geometry :high
* Texture :medium
* Lighting :high
* Dynamic Shadows :high
* Dynamic Light :high
* Anti-Aliasing :8x
* Texture Filtering :high



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, I haven't seemed to have dropped below 30 yet but I have noticed a large decrease in fps.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Well like I said above, I haven't gone below 30fps so its been pretty playable, I guess maybe a 6 or 7.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Operation Dragonfly
Lashkar Valley
Fallujah West

The other newer maps and maps that have been significantly updated also cause a drop in performance but it seems those three are the worst.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

If I can load Dragonfly without getting a memory error then when I first spawn in I lag so bad that Punkbuster kicks me for heartbeat stop. But otherwise when I am in or near the city I get the biggest performance drop.

Lashkar I always seem to have low fps no matter where I am. More specifically up and down the grid closest to the river on the right side.

Fallujah I seem to have low fps everywhere, but again more specifically around the big grass field to the north of the US spawn and around the middle of the city around the Mosque.

Also, any map when I zoom in and out with the PKM it seems to have a huge performance drop in that transition time.
5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

I seem to have performance issues with all of the maps but its mainly the new ones or the ones that have been significantly updated.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[EC]DR.NOobFragger is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:20 AM   #16
NyteMyre

NyteMyre's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP Prof
* CPU : AMD Athlon 64 - 3500 (2.2 GHz)
* Graphics Card : Asus ATi X850xt 256MB
* Amount of RAM : 2GB DDR (on Dual Channel)
* Sound Card : onboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1280x800

* Terrain : medium
* Effects : medium
* Geometry : medium
* Texture : medium
* Lighting : medium
* Dynamic Shadows : low
* Dynamic Light : low
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : medium
* View distance : 95%



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3/10 (especially on new maps)

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Lashkar Valley / Silent Eagle / The Russia vs Militia insurgency (the one with the Ferriswheel) / Basicly all new maps / Haven't really played old maps yet except for Asad which runs fine

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Lashkar: Everywhere...even in the tunnels
Silent Eagle: Outskirts village, looking at village
Ferriswheel map: Everywhere

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Asad is the only map so far without performance issue. Haven't played others yet. If I put everything to low and resolution on 1024x480 it runs fine.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
NyteMyre is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:39 AM   #17
BloodyDeed
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member
PR Server License Administrator

BloodyDeed's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 64Bit
* CPU : Intel Core2Duo E6600 @ Default
* Graphics Card : nVidia Geforce GTX 275
* Amount of RAM : 4 GB
* Sound Card : Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1280x1024

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : No (with AA i get no ground textures)
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes. But I can play 0.9 without crashes or something else. Just a significant framedrop on some maps but its still very good playable.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach, Beirut, Dragonfly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

None

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Dunno, didnt play all of the rest in 0.9.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BloodyDeed is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:48 AM   #18
BorEDeviL

BorEDeviL's Avatar
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications
  • Operating System : Win XP 32 Service Pack 3
  • CPU : AMD Athlon 64 x2 4400+
  • Graphics Card : GeForce 8800 GTS
  • Amount of RAM : 4Gb
  • Sound Card : Realtek HD Audio
BF2 Graphics Settings
  • Resolution : 1360x768 @ 60Hz
  • Terrain : High
  • Effects : High
  • Geometry : High
  • Texture : High
  • Lighting : High
  • Dynamic Shadows : High
  • Dynamic Light : High
  • Anti-Aliasing : 8x
  • Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

4

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach, Beirut and Lashkar Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In all maps mentioned above looking towards any built up area will cause severe FPS drops. Gaza and Beirut being the worst. Vegetation (fields etc.) seems to have little or no effect.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Yamalia has run very smoothly save for a little lag, same for most of the old maps, however I have not had a chance to try all of the old ones yet.
BorEDeviL is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 08:52 AM   #19
quaazi
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows Vista Bsuiness
* CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.0GHz
* Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
* Amount of RAM : 2046MB RAM
* Sound Card : onboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 800x600

* Terrain : low/off
* Effects : low/off
* Geometry : low/off
* Texture : low/off
* Lighting : low/off
* Dynamic Shadows : low/off
* Dynamic Light : low/off
* Anti-Aliasing : low/off
* Texture Filtering : low/off



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

A: Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Beirut
Yamalia

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Titanic FPS drop when looking at places with more distance - off the skyscraper in Beirut or over the fields in Yamalia.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Didn't get any further, closed the game. Sorry.
quaazi is offline
Old 02-06-2010, 09:05 AM   #20
1Mystic-G
Default Re: Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

System Specs
* OS: Windows XP (32bit)
* CPU: Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0Ghz
* Video Card: 8800GTS 320MB
* RAM: 2GBs
* Sound Card: Onboard

Graphical Settings
* Resolution: 1280x1024
* Terrain: High
* Effects: Medium
* Geometry: Medium
* Texture: High
* Lighting: Medium
* Dynamic Shadows: Medium
* Dynamic Light: Medium
* Anti-Aliasing: x2
* Texture Filtering: Medium


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5. My framerate has dropped dramatically, probably half if not worse most of the time.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
I only played on 4 so far and all three were pretty poor so it's a bit unfair to note them like they were the worst.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Pretty much all around although the more objects (ie: buildings) on the screen the worse it gets.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
None yet.
1Mystic-G is offline
Closed Thread


Tags
performance, project, reality, reporting, template
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2014, Project Reality.