|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 37
|
Why are IED's so small? I mean they're like 3 times+ smaller than C4 and yet it seems to me they make the same kinda size explosion. I like the look with the mobile and all, however maybe an old artillery round or something would look and feel more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: norfolk
Posts: 8,075
|
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,099
|
|
|
My
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. My To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. AnimalMother's To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
Guess it's just good for game-play to have them small and hard to see since you cant hide them below the surface
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
PR Military Adviser
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,785
|
The demolition charge in PR is currently not modeled after the normal charge used. From what I understand, it's a place-holder until the proper one can be made (low priority).
IED's come in all shapes and sizes. Obviously, the larger the charge then the longer it's going to take to bury it. In the game you are setting up a device in a short amount of time. If we start adding bigger IED's, then we'll need to start increasing the deploy times to scale with it. You want to sit there for 30 seconds digging a hole? I think the IED's in game are fine as they are now. If used correctly they can do a lot of damage. Don't forget that real vehicles are now being made to withstand the effects of IED's, so even a big one will do little damage. Just for comparison, the "real" C-4 charge that will hopefully replace the one in game now is the M112 Demolition Charge. For size comparison, the image below shows a bunch of them scattered around the rest of the ordnance. You can see the linked 40mm rounds in the bottom-left of the image to compare easily.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 37
|
Yer fair enough its low priority, good image, would be sick to see the replacement of current satchel charge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
yeah not priority but maybe in the future has ther been thought to being able to bury ur IED/mines with the use of a shovel after deployment??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| ied, small |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|