Commanding

[goguapsy]

Originally Posted by foob

maybe i would have taken more notice if i could actually use that section of the forums.. i apologize for being shafted due to lack of post count (AFAIK you can search that section of the forums. And don't worry, you are not the only one being, as you call it, "shafted" for posting this in the wrong section. Just look at any locked thread: 50% of the time it will be a suggestion and one of the posts will say "There is a reason why you need to have 25 posts to post something)

after checking the ASS thread i could only find "Cruise Missles" and "UAV commander zoom" no Predator or Predator UAV or Predator AGM missles, how bout u quote before u flame gogu??

(cough not flaming cough)

Check the name of the thread: http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-...dator-uav.html

http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-...0455-uavs.html

http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-...hellfires.html


And yes I was mistaken there are no AGM for UAVs thread. My mistake, they suggested for the A10. But well, missiles have been suggested over and over and over again. Do you want me to post UAV zoom, too?

(BTW don't suggest fastropes, they have been suggested already. Just letting you know!)


Have a (literally) warm welcome to the forums!


And don't worry, everyone gets locked threads!

Originally Posted by Herbiie

The Zoom on the UAV is a good one though and not hardcoded as the UAV is a vehicle, and we have zoom on several vehicles,

The UAV is a missile and cannot have zoom...

[goguapsy]

Originally Posted by foob

flaming, baiting, being an asshole.. lol call it w/e u want, and ur the one getting excited all i did was tell it like it is and u have to go put up the definition of "flaming", take it srsly much?

and remember ther have been other things that are so called 'hardcoded' that have been acomplished on the engine such as the carrier catapult and air to air radar

A carrier catapult? Where? sounds cool!

[foob]

YouTube Video

[503]

Originally Posted by foob

and remember ther have been other things that are so called 'hardcoded' that have been acomplished on the engine such as the carrier catapult and air to air radar

The carrier catapult nor the air to air radar was ever called hardcoded.


As for the UAV, a zoom feature would be nice though useless on low view distance maps. And a predator missile is hardcoded as the UAV itself is a missile.

[foob]

ppl definately shrugged off carrier catapults as being hardcoded dude

[Snazz]

Originally Posted by foob

ppl definately shrugged off carrier catapults as being hardcoded dude

I don't recall any devs saying that it is hardcoded. There just isn't an appropriate use for it yet.

In CA it's demonstrated on the BF2 wasp-class assault ship, but for it to be realistic it must be on a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

[foob]

Originally Posted by Snazz

I don't recall any devs saying that it is hardcoded. There just isn't an appropriate use for it yet.

In CA it's demonstrated on the BF2 wasp-class assault ship, but for it to be realistic it must be on a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

wasnt refering to pr devs, was talking about the modding community in general

[goguapsy]

Originally Posted by 503

As for the UAV, a zoom feature would be nice though useless on low view distance maps. And a predator missile is hardcoded as the UAV itself is a missile.

Now I got myself scratching my head... isn't that harcoded? (for the UAV is a missile?)

Originally Posted by foob

wasnt refering to pr devs, was talking about the modding community in general

You really should only take for granted what the DEVs say.

I have a tendency to trust other players tho... But most people say "something SOUNDS hardcoded" when they haven't seen any DEVs saying it's hardcoded.

[SilentWarrior]

Goguapsy enough... (after reading all the posts, even I can detect aggressiveness on your posts... as for general, theres alot of aggressiveness on "suggestions" topics... which i cant understand tbh)

As for improvements on Commander, bring them on, no one really wants to be commander, its quite borring due to the lack of information available... the UAV improvement was quite nice, but, the camera rotation is so strict that its still quite borring to be a commander...

Since the game is slow enough, commanders should have more information to play with (generated by the game), it is hard enough to understand some screaming squad leaders as is, when they reply at all.

But its true, it is rewarding when you get several squads that actually talk back to the commander providing info and do as told afterwards.

[goguapsy]

Originally Posted by SilentWarrior

Goguapsy enough... (after reading all the posts, even I can detect aggressiveness on your posts... as for general, theres alot of aggressiveness on "suggestions" topics... which i cant understand tbh)

whheeerree is I aggressive????????????????????????


Back on topic, I didn't know there was rotation.

Anyways YES this improvements SOUNDS GOOD BUT I really really think they are hardcoded, as in, I've seen other threads getting locked for ressugestion.