|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sodertalje
Posts: 5,392
|
Quote:
then remove all the CAS aircraft too then, since all the "kids" want to fly them too? | |
|
----
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ----"You are now the AK Jesus" / Expendable Grunt |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 144
|
The idea of using these weapons ingame actually might have merit, such as removing the enemies comms from play in an obj similar to destroying weapons caches. Why not add this as a "bonus" obj to a insurgency-type gameplay (in addition to caches, a team scoring an effective "kill" on a comms tower or something would give extra tickets to the BLUFOR but wouldn't detract from OPFOR). It would expand the narrow focus which PR is currently limited to, kills and caches.
|
|
=]H[=shwedor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
|
I disagree with people who said that 12.7 cals isn't use to shoot infantery. This heavy cals allows snipers to shoot at more of 1500 meters. i have read a debriefing which says that a shooter killed a taliban at 2450 meters with a 12.7 cals in a Hecate II.
If PR makes it possible for players to see more than 1000 meters, cals 50. should be used sorry for my english there are 2 or 3 things i am not sure that is good form ^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sheridan WY, 82801
Posts: 77
|
Just wait and see what they do with the sniper class, I know the main reason that people want this is probably because it kills in one hit.
Personally I'm tired of shooting someone in the chest and not having them fly like a fish. Like I said, they are tweaking the sniper kits for future releases so just wait to see if they make it a 1 hit kill for any rifle. (if you do people won't really freak out over getting the .50 cause the M24/M40 will do just as good a job vs infantry) |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: norfolk
Posts: 8,075
|
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() |
You're forgetting some laws of physics. In order for that person to go that distance, the shooter would have to go the same distance in the opposite direction.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Please, for the sake of the kittens don't click on the link! plz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
PR Military Adviser
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,785
|
Quote:
But in reality, the .50-caliber is not generally going to do that. The flying bodies was a bug. | |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() |
it should be like if you right click when recuesting sniper you get a 50.cal. and left click you get the standar sniper.
and limit the 50. to one per team |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]Ninja2dan:
Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 226
|
Here is a simple question.
Why does everyone that agrees want it in PR? As Ninja2dan has said. Its primarily an anti-material rifle. Designed to disable enemy vehicles and other objects. It has also been used to exceed the standard range of a normal sniper's rifle. Such as the M24. PR's current scale doesn't lend itself to 'exceeding' the range of a normal rifle. The engagement size and the lack of accurate depiction of its anti-material abilities are reasons for it not to be in PR. I'm not going to arguing that it draws 'noobs'. I'm still a noob in many aspects. I also don't use sniper rifles. I'm not going to say 'It looks cool' as a reason to add it to the game. What reason do you want the weapon ingame? Give some facts / reasons why it should be added to the game for realism sake and for practicality's sake. Yes the longest confirmed sniper kill was by a .50 caliber weapon however. Its also much farther range then you can engage in PR. |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Proof that cheese love is better then any other. [R-DEV]Cheeseman: "As tempting as the woman in Katarn’s avatar might be I'd still pick Cheese if I had to decide between either one. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() |
IMO it isn't needed ingame, even though I want it. As it has been said, the PR maps are smaller than the maximum range of this weapon (or the range exceeded), therefore having it is redundant. Noobs are always taking snipers and wasting the kit as is, adding a .50 cal will only make it worse.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| acceptable, barret, rifles, sniper |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|