too many new Ins. maps?

ma21212 · 11-06-2009, 01:48 PM

Correct me if im wrong but alot of the upcoming maps are Ins. All the new maps Ive read about that are coming in .9 are Ins. (from IDF fighting Hammas to Canadian Forces in Afganistan) other community faction modders are doing the same thing (Germany/ADF/French etc.) . I havint seen any new MEC or PLA maps cuz thats more fun imo. so...are Devs keepin quite about them..?

boilerrat · 11-06-2009, 01:53 PM

A lot of people I have played with absolutely hate the PLA, along with me because jungle fighting feels very slow and boring. Like in River qwai, for the first like 20 minutes or more there usually isn't any kills.

Another reason mappers might be making more insurgency maps, is it is just much more popular than PLA and MEC maps, look at the "CHICAGO INSURGENCY .87" server, their server is full just about always and has players at pretty much anytime (Besides sunday at 5am :P).

Look at this: http://www.game-monitor.com/search.p...nt=PR&game=bf2

According to their data, the chicago insurgency server is doing very well.

gazzthompson · 11-06-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boilerrat

A lot of people I have played with absolutely hate the PLA, along with me because jungle fighting feels very slow and boring. Like in River qwai, for the first like 20 minutes or more there usually isn't any kills.

i cant speak for others but PLA is my favorite team as the QBZ pwns everything.

Cheditor · 11-06-2009, 01:58 PM

Well someone correct me if i'm wrong but afaik hammas are a unconventional force like chechans.

Hoboknighter · 11-06-2009, 02:00 PM

Well, there is about a 2:1 ratio for AAS to Ins maps, and while AAS can be more varied in terms of gameplay, the Insurgency maps tend to follow the same pattern and need some more variety.

ma21212 · 11-06-2009, 02:05 PM

i mean...MEC/PLA got jets tanks etc. to deal with BLUFOR and this means complicated battles but Chechs play with a "Ins." style gameplay (like using spandrel to ambush T90s)

gazzthompson · 11-06-2009, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boilerrat

Another reason mappers might be making more insurgency maps, is it is just much more popular than PLA and MEC maps, look at the "CHICAGO INSURGENCY .87" server, their server is full just about always and has players at pretty much anytime (Besides sunday at 5am :P).

Look at this: Servers playing BattleField 2 | Server / Player Search | Game-Monitor.com :: Server Search, Monitoring, Stats and more

According to their data, the chicago insurgency server is doing very well.

that logic is flawed. its full because its unique (only a couple of INS only servers). there are no other INS servers in the top 23 PR servers (two of which include muttrah only servers).

also remember, the "PLA and MEC maps" also have US team on them which people love to cum there pants over...

ma21212 · 11-06-2009, 02:13 PM

ummm the Chicago MIXED server is always full too. both are full that done mean Ins is more fun. both are fun im just sayin thier are TOO MANY new ins. maps i havint seen any new normal maps

Elektro · 11-06-2009, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ma21212

but Chechs play with a "Ins." style gameplay (like using spandrel to ambush T90s)

using a TOW is insurgency style ? Then the US army is quite an insurgent groupe

(TOW on Ejod & Qwai)-^

Snazz · 11-07-2009, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ma21212

All the new maps Ive read about that are coming in .9 are Ins

http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196...ridge-wip.html
http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196...onfly-wip.html
http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196...chira-wip.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by ma21212

I havint seen any new MEC or PLA maps cuz thats more fun imo.

Chinese city - Project Reality Forums

In addition 9/17 of these maps are AAS: http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-...ml#post1025000

Also plenty of community AAS maps being made here: Community Maps - Project Reality Forums

11-06-2009, 01:48 PM	#1
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	too many new Ins. maps? Correct me if im wrong but alot of the upcoming maps are Ins. All the new maps Ive read about that are coming in .9 are Ins. (from IDF fighting Hammas to Canadian Forces in Afganistan) other community faction modders are doing the same thing (Germany/ADF/French etc.) . I havint seen any new MEC or PLA maps cuz thats more fun imo. so...are Devs keepin quite about them..?
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-06-2009, 01:53 PM	#2
boilerrat Join Date: Sep 2009 United States of America Location: Michigan Posts: 1,470	Re: too many new Ins. maps? A lot of people I have played with absolutely hate the PLA, along with me because jungle fighting feels very slow and boring. Like in River qwai, for the first like 20 minutes or more there usually isn't any kills. Another reason mappers might be making more insurgency maps, is it is just much more popular than PLA and MEC maps, look at the "CHICAGO INSURGENCY .87" server, their server is full just about always and has players at pretty much anytime (Besides sunday at 5am :P). Look at this: http://www.game-monitor.com/search.p...nt=PR&game=bf2 According to their data, the chicago insurgency server is doing very well.

	Last edited by boilerrat; 11-06-2009 at 02:05 PM..

11-06-2009, 01:58 PM	#4
Cheditor Join Date: Mar 2009 United Kingdom Location: london Posts: 2,361	Re: too many new Ins. maps? Well someone correct me if i'm wrong but afaik hammas are a unconventional force like chechans.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-06-2009, 02:00 PM	#5
Hoboknighter Join Date: Mar 2009 United States of America Location: Minnesota Posts: 150	Re: too many new Ins. maps? Well, there is about a 2:1 ratio for AAS to Ins maps, and while AAS can be more varied in terms of gameplay, the Insurgency maps tend to follow the same pattern and need some more variety.

11-06-2009, 02:05 PM	#6
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	Re: too many new Ins. maps? i mean...MEC/PLA got jets tanks etc. to deal with BLUFOR and this means complicated battles but Chechs play with a "Ins." style gameplay (like using spandrel to ambush T90s)
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-06-2009, 02:13 PM	#8
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	Re: too many new Ins. maps? ummm the Chicago MIXED server is always full too. both are full that done mean Ins is more fun. both are fun im just sayin thier are TOO MANY new ins. maps i havint seen any new normal maps
ma21212 Join Date: Nov 2007 Cambodia Posts: 1,731	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links