project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2009, 11:02 AM   #21
TheOldBreed

TheOldBreed's Avatar
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

you can never have too many insurgency maps! never! haha

but i think perhaps it's going a bit too far, with all these different factions. i saw somewhere i while back that the japs are in the works?!?

i'm hoping that someone will develop another map for the Marine Corps, preferably an Afghan one. perhaps, someone will take it upon themselves to do two versions of Sangin, one with the British Army, one with the Marines....here's hoping haha
TheOldBreed is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:40 PM   #22
TheValkyre

TheValkyre's Avatar
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Yes, I agree with OldBreed. The lack of USMC maps pains me, but I still love this mod! and like said before I think there are more and more Ins maps because there are not any large conventional wars going on right now for inspiration, and personally I love ins maps if they are played right.....
TheValkyre is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 01:14 PM   #23
L4gi
Server Administrator (A-N)
PR Server License Moderator

L4gi's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to L4gi Send a message via Skype™ to L4gi
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Maps with US/Brits having light/medium assets versus MEC/PLA having heavy assets. Like Muttrah, but turned around!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
L4gi is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 01:18 PM   #24
Zrix
Supporting Member

Zrix's Avatar
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by L4gi View Post
Maps with US/Brits having light/medium assets versus MEC/PLA having heavy assets. Like Muttrah, but turned around!
We had that, was called Qwai River. But they broke it



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Zrix is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 03:19 PM   #25
[R-MOD]Jigsaw
Forum Moderator
Project Reality Beta Tester

[R-MOD]Jigsaw's Avatar
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zrix View Post
We had that, was called Qwai River. But they broke it

Lies, its still like that. Only better.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Check out my PR gameplay videos ->
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"Everything starts with a choice, and we are free to make it"
WWJND?
[R-MOD]Jigsaw is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:10 PM   #26
Nebsif
Supporting Member

Nebsif's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Nebsif
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

The taliban maps always made me either insta alt f4 or rage quit after 30mins, theyre designed for veryyy high teamwork which u cant see on pub servs (+ their shitty balance). What I hate about ins is that if ur on coalition side, u will prolly have a nice K/D but still loose, if ur on ins side, u will die allot and have the annoying bleed screen 70% of the time.
In devs we trust, so I hope they will balance and make it more interesting, and so both sides will have somewhat equal chances to win.

About AAS maps and factions, PLA rapes, I dont understand why ppl dont luv it.. USMC is my least favorite faction bcuz of their weapons, though I'd prefer it over PLA on Qwai anytime. Ppl always grab these APCs which are so easy to take down on that map. On some maps, heavy assets (when u have many of them) are like traps left by devs, cuz theyre so clumsy, easy to ambush, easy to hide from and cost allot of tickets, plus the fact that most apcs are used like tanks...
Talking about maps like Qwai, Fools Road & Kozelsk, where the side with the heavy assets already has better weaponry; QBZ rapes M4 in CQB, and is equal to it.. in non CQB :P Irons AK74 is better than AK47 (and that short AK thingie..), both in CQB and accuracy wise, + the russian irons rifleman kit has 3 F1 nades compared to one anti light vehicle nade. So its like the ticket-costy heavy assets are balancing stuff up in favor for the other faction

Last thing: Jungle and Forest maps require more coordination and favor the sneaky ones like me, luv those maps!
Nebsif is offline
Last edited by Nebsif; 11-08-2009 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:24 PM   #27
Elektro

Elektro's Avatar
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebsif View Post
The taliban maps always made me either insta alt f4 or rage quit after 30mins, theyre designed for veryyy high teamwork which u cant see on pub servs (+ their shitty balance). What I hate about ins is that if ur on coalition side, u will prolly have a nice K/D but still loose, if ur on ins side, u will die allot and have the annoying bleed screen 70% of the time.
In devs we trust, so I hope they will balance and make it more interesting, and so both sides will have somewhat equal chances to win.
Taliban are so easy to play IMO Just make a squad with a medic in it and you wont have the bleed screen + you can die as many times as you want, but the americans cant so the point is to kill as many americans as possible even tho you die yourself... Defend caches too ofc


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Elektro is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:47 PM   #28
charliegrs

charliegrs's Avatar
Send a message via AIM to charliegrs Send a message via Yahoo to charliegrs
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman.2.5 View Post
you got a time machine to take us back to 1973 ? XD
um israel and syria could still very much go to war. i wasnt talking about the yom kippur war.

known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
'
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
charliegrs is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:57 PM   #29
Nebsif
Supporting Member

Nebsif's Avatar
Send a message via MSN to Nebsif
Default Re: too many new Ins. maps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elektro View Post
Taliban are so easy to play IMO Just make a squad with a medic in it and you wont have the bleed screen + you can die as many times as you want, but the americans cant so the point is to kill as many americans as possible even tho you die yourself... Defend caches too ofc
Yapyap, taliban have field dressings and armed medics, defending the small village is also very easy, but its a different story with Iraqi insurgents.

Edit: About Iran, Syria etc etc, Imo, its a waste of time, better leave them all as mec for now, and have the devs work on other unique factions.
Nebsif is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
ins, maps
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.