|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 475
|
It could be nice on some maps like kashan but it would totally ruin other maps like Ejod. And all you who says make it a choice between AA or TOW, have you looked at the number of maps withouth air? Maybe you only play muttrah but please think a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
NZDF Faction Lead
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,712
|
I disagree when u say it would ruin maps like Ejod. They would just get played differently.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Community Faction Team - "Getting Sh*t Done..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() |
I think it s okay. You should be able to decide between a deployable aa or a tow. That means one tow OR aa for the defence of an outpost
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 247
|
Yes it should be. And not only near to the firebase, I'd say anywhere but near the opposite main base. It's good idea to limit the amount of ammunition, let's say 3 at max. Not sure how the splash damage is set ATM, but if it's there it should be reduced so it would not be powerful against infantry.
It would also be good to see it as mobile asset like they are at FH2 (mortars etc.) but with a long time to set up, as it is IRL. Rest would lay on the skills of the TOW user(s) - would be nice to have a TOW team with a spotter too - how you use the terrain for protection and so on, all the stuff they teach you when you get training as anti-tank infantry. Edit: Actually, there could be both TOW within the firebase (1 each FB) and a requestable TOW kit for TOW teams (like sniper teams, let's say 1 TOW kit for each team). But now someone will come and say too much TOW's... |
|
|
Last edited by fubar++; 09-09-2009 at 07:32 AM..
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() |
I like to see 3 assets to be build around a firebase as a maximum. So that could be 3 HMG's, or 1 HMG, 1 AA, ! TOW. Add minefields of 10 pieces that can be build and the defense of the fb will be guarenteed...
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | ||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
| ||
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
NZDF Faction Lead
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,712
|
Hmmm as cool as that sounds, its quite ridiculous realy. We already have a HAT kit. Why add another one?
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Community Faction Team - "Getting Sh*t Done..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
|
agreed a TOW on a fob would make a reason for people to acctualy sit back and defend instead of just abandoning it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,662
|
thats like having an immoble HAT kit. But better D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
NZDF Faction Lead
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,712
|
I think it will also help lead to some good FB defense firefights. At the moment they are usually a bit 'build and forget'. If the mortar becomes a deployable asset aswell as the TOW we could have some serious bases on our hands
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. PR Community Faction Team - "Getting Sh*t Done..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| asset, deployable, tow |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|