Should the TOW be a deployable asset? - Page 3

<<SpanishSurfer>> · 09-07-2009, 02:01 PM

Yes DEF include them!

503 · 09-07-2009, 02:20 PM

I'd like a TOW deployable asset but not too far from the FB. It would be strange to have TOWs 500 meters away from a FB in the middle of nowhere.

superhunty123 · 09-07-2009, 04:09 PM

Totally agree on maps like Kashan where FB's stick out like a sore thumb and have no defense against tanks but they should not be able to build them on maps like Ejod or Mestia

rrrrrkkkkk · 09-07-2009, 04:26 PM

tow with maximum 2 hits, so infantry will have to be wise to use it

Ghost1800 · 09-07-2009, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd

I'm not a huge fan of the TOW launchers

and ingame they would become little artillery pieces

with HATs, LATs etc the battlefield is already dangerous enough for the vehicles imo.

also, TOWs fire a one shot kill projectile iirc, different to the TOWs carried on the humvee/APCs.

This may seem like a rather stupid idea or too simplistic... but couldn't deployable TOWs fire the same projectile as the mobile TOWs to compensate for them being able to be placed almost anywhere on the map?

EnermaX · 09-07-2009, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not_able_to_kill

It appears that everything that is unbalanced/overpowered/overkill is taken out of this mod, i want to ask? is a war really SO balanced in real life?

No it isnt, but if we change like in real, the weaker faction will soon be fed up with the mod.

amazing_retard · 09-07-2009, 05:12 PM

Big maps perhaps, but on maps like Jabal I see major balance issues....

ledo1222 · 09-07-2009, 08:57 PM

i agree we need that tow like instead of aa on some maps its tow

<<SpanishSurfer>> · 09-07-2009, 10:27 PM

A Tow with only 2-3 shots available.....auto reload every 10-15 min...

GreedoNeverShot · 09-08-2009, 12:06 AM

If we give it anymore than AA (from AA), AT (from TOW), Unlimited supplies (from crates), Anti-infantry (from HMGs), protection of infantry (from sandbags/ foxhole things), enemy vehicle and personnel obstruction (from Wire and traps), and a spawnpoint, then eventually it will just become an RTS game.

Maybe after this we can add trenches, vehicle garages, artillery emplacements, medical tents, and etc. /sarcasm

They are hard enough to kill now, but give them protection from armor (at they should already have from good placement, inf AT, and traps/wire) and then they will be invincible.

I think there should be a very limited amount if they are put in.

09-07-2009, 02:01 PM	#21
<<SpanishSurfer>> Join Date: May 2006 United States of America Posts: 203	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? Yes DEF include them!
	"Get lost, support your Coast Guard."

09-07-2009, 02:20 PM	#22
503 Join Date: Aug 2008 United States of America Location: New York City Posts: 656	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? I'd like a TOW deployable asset but not too far from the FB. It would be strange to have TOWs 500 meters away from a FB in the middle of nowhere.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

09-07-2009, 04:09 PM	#23
superhunty123 Join Date: Aug 2009 United Kingdom Location: The best county in England- SURREY! Posts: 66	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? Totally agree on maps like Kashan where FB's stick out like a sore thumb and have no defense against tanks but they should not be able to build them on maps like Ejod or Mestia

09-07-2009, 04:26 PM	#24
rrrrrkkkkk Join Date: Nov 2008 Brazil Posts: 28	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? tow with maximum 2 hits, so infantry will have to be wise to use it
rrrrrkkkkk Join Date: Nov 2008 Brazil Posts: 28

09-07-2009, 05:12 PM	#27
amazing_retard Join Date: Oct 2008 United States of America Location: chicago Posts: 380	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? Big maps perhaps, but on maps like Jabal I see major balance issues....

09-07-2009, 08:57 PM	#28
ledo1222 Join Date: Mar 2009 Canada Location: maple Posts: 537	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? i agree we need that tow like instead of aa on some maps its tow
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. -The Mods cant Silence me! -Its all a Conspiracy all OF IT! -Boys get the duck tape ready..... Umm..... Been palying PR:ARMA2 since 0.1v beta 8D

09-07-2009, 10:27 PM	#29
<<SpanishSurfer>> Join Date: May 2006 United States of America Posts: 203	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? A Tow with only 2-3 shots available.....auto reload every 10-15 min...
	"Get lost, support your Coast Guard."

09-08-2009, 12:06 AM	#30
GreedoNeverShot Join Date: Jun 2008 United States of America Location: AlBasrah Posts: 215	Re: Should the TOW be a deployable asset? If we give it anymore than AA (from AA), AT (from TOW), Unlimited supplies (from crates), Anti-infantry (from HMGs), protection of infantry (from sandbags/ foxhole things), enemy vehicle and personnel obstruction (from Wire and traps), and a spawnpoint, then eventually it will just become an RTS game. Maybe after this we can add trenches, vehicle garages, artillery emplacements, medical tents, and etc. /sarcasm They are hard enough to kill now, but give them protection from armor (at they should already have from good placement, inf AT, and traps/wire) and then they will be invincible. I think there should be a very limited amount if they are put in.
	"If you outlaw guns, only Outlaws will have guns."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links