project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2009, 08:03 AM   #1
JDMT

JDMT's Avatar
Default Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

I decided to test this on Combined Arms(Please don't argue about this, it's the SAME BMP-3 in PR, so you'd get the same results). The BMP-3 floats IRL, Floats in PR, but it does many other things in the water(Watch the video).



So, do you really want a BMP-3 on Muttrah?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ACRE Tester

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JDMT is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 08:14 AM   #2
Engineer

Engineer's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Don't be so sensational... If it's a bug, it can probably be fixed.

Though, somehow this reminded me of my days in navy.
Engineer is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 08:24 AM   #3
Emnyron
Supporting Member
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

It wont be on muttra becuse of the NWACHNT issue. (Non-Western Armies Cant Have Nice Things)

Edit: User was warned for u"seless/unhelpful" posting. Such simplifications don't really help the discussion.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


We kindly request that you die a pencil lodged in your eye socket.

-[R-DEV]Gaz

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Emnyron is offline
Last edited by [R-MOD]Saobh; 06-29-2009 at 10:25 AM..
Old 06-29-2009, 08:28 AM   #4
KingLorre

KingLorre's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emnyron View Post
It wont be on muttra becuse of the NWACHNT issue. (Non-Western Armies Cant Have Nice Things)
Dont you try to start a flame war now, because what your saying is Redicules

and i tought our BMP3 was from special forces? and i tought it did float in that, so it can hopefully be fixed.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

#49 - Most viewed (today) Reporter of the Netherlands
#6 - Most viewed (today) - Reporter of the Netherlands
#63 - Most viewed (This week) - Reporter of the Netherlands
#58 - Most viewed (This Month) - Reporter of the Netherlands
KingLorre is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 08:43 AM   #5
JDMT

JDMT's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLorre View Post
Dont you try to start a flame war now, because what your saying is Redicules

and i tought our BMP3 was from special forces? and i tought it did float in that, so it can hopefully be fixed.
Yes it is from BF2 Special Forces, another thing that needs to be fixed is the Interior, it looks weird with doors on both sides of it.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ACRE Tester

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JDMT is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 08:44 AM   #6
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emnyron View Post
It wont be on muttra becuse of the NWACHNT issue. (Non-Western Armies Cant Have Nice Things)
go make a map, give the MEC/PLA nice things and if the map is good enough it'll get in to PR.









cuz generally afaik teh mapper gets to choose what goes on the map.

Very silly comment anyway.

If you put the work in to fixing teh BMP for water, then it'll get on a water map.

Jeez.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure."
I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.
Rudd is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 10:00 AM   #7
Cpt.Kawakowitsch

Cpt.Kawakowitsch's Avatar
Send a message via ICQ to Cpt.Kawakowitsch
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd View Post
go make a map, give the MEC/PLA nice things and if the map is good enough it'll get in to PR.









cuz generally afaik teh mapper gets to choose what goes on the map.

Very silly comment anyway.

If you put the work in to fixing teh BMP for water, then it'll get on a water map.

Jeez.
Why is this a silly comment, in fact it isn't. Of course the mapper is deciding what gets on the map and what not and the DEV-Team is deciding what gets into the mod, and if the decision is that US/UK will get the good stuff and the others not there is a NWACHNT-Issue. (nice abbreviation btw ) It was and it is that the US/UK armies are getting all nice toys and the rest are left behind. E.g. no fast transport choppers for MEC/PLA, no scopes on the LMGs for MEC/PLA, crappy APC (gun overheats in two seconds and no protection for the gunner) for PLA on .86, none guideable HAT for PLA, no up-armoured transport vehicles with MG, like the Hummvee, for MEC/PLA etc... and don't tell me that those factions aren't capable of having such stuff IRL, thats simply not true. And don't say something like: "Go and make one", because that would make every critical comment on the mod obsolete.

But it is a game, I have fun with it, no matter which side I am on, even it is somehow western-hemisphere friendly , but none the less, from my POV UK/US are the favourites of the DEVs and thats their right, but so one should have the right to point it out.
Cpt.Kawakowitsch is offline
Last edited by Cpt.Kawakowitsch; 06-29-2009 at 10:11 AM..
Old 06-29-2009, 10:10 AM   #8
burghUK

burghUK's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

The Western factions equipment is superior in real life and as such should be in the game also.

pepsi and cigarettes
Breakfast of champions

All i know is my gut says maybe
burghUK is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 10:12 AM   #9
gazzthompson

gazzthompson's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt.Kawakowitsch View Post
Why is this a silly comment, in fact it isn't. Of course the mapper is deciding what gets on the map and what not and the DEV-Team is deciding what gets into the mod, and if the decision is that US/UK will get the good stuff and the others not there is a NWACHNT-Issue. (nice abbreviation btw ) It was and it is that the US/UK armies are getting all nice toys and the rest are left behind. E.g. no fast transport choppers for MEC/PLA, no scopes on the LMGs for MEC/PLA, crappy APC (gun overheats in two seconds and no protection for the gunner) for PLA on .86, none guideable HAT for PLA, no up-armoured transport vehicles with MG, like the Hummvee, for MEC/PLA etc... and don't tell me that those factions aren't capable of having such stuff IRL, thats simply not true. And don't say something like: "Go and make one", because that would make every critical comment on the mod obsolete.
"no scopes on LMG's for MEC/PLA" - they get a 4x zoom which IMO is better (though only a place holder) because of the bigger field of view.

"crappy APC" - maps like qwai the PLA have a APC with a cannon and US have one with a 50.cal, so incorrect.

"none guideable HAT for PLA" - quicker set up time that other HATs

"no up-armored transport vehicles with MG like hummvee" - ummmm, what about the "crap" APC you just mentioned ? more armor than hummvee and more protection to gunner.

come on kawa, you should know better than this ! also (arguably) the PLA have the best rifle in the game ! much better than m4/m16 so come on guys....


Quote:
Originally Posted by JDMT View Post
So, do you really want a BMP-3 on Muttrah?
god i hope this is a joke, it was amazingly obvious that all that shizz going on in the video was a bug..


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
gazzthompson is offline
Old 06-29-2009, 10:19 AM   #10
sakils2
Banned

sakils2's Avatar
Default Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by crAck_sh0t View Post
The Western factions equipment is superior in real life and as such should be in the game also.
I guess, you are one of those who teamswitches because you can't be a US Marine.

God, I hate patriotic fools.

Edit: User was warned for "attitude problem". These kinds of free attacks will not be accepted on these forums.
sakils2 is offline
Last edited by [R-MOD]Saobh; 06-29-2009 at 10:31 AM..
Closed Thread


Tags
bmp, map, water
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.