Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water - Page 2

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto · 06-29-2009, 10:20 AM

WHINING/DEBATING ABOUT ASSETS IN THIS THREAD STOPS NOW

Thank you

~~sakils2~~ · 06-29-2009, 10:23 AM

Shouldn't there be a lock, then?

BTW, does my sig break any forum laws?

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto · 06-29-2009, 10:26 AM

You can still discuss the BMP floating... if you wish... or why i did it, or whatever. Just dont whine or debate assets and how PR is ruining all your lives

And no, doesnt break any rules that I see

Cheditor · 06-29-2009, 12:14 PM

JDMT what was the point of this thread may i ask? It looks like your reporting a bug but that belongs in the Bug section of the forums and if you were asking if it was bugged then you were already told in your other BMP-3 thread that it was bugged.

JDMT · 06-29-2009, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-COM]Cheditor

JDMT what was the point of this thread may i ask? It looks like your reporting a bug but that belongs in the Bug section of the forums and if you were asking if it was bugged then you were already told in your other BMP-3 thread that it was bugged.

I was just showing it off...Good point, useless thread lock it please!

Fighter · 06-29-2009, 07:54 PM

But this is combined arms, isnt it? Or did I overlook that?

(Forget what I just said (smacks self in forehead after reading OP

)

Easily fixable bug.

Bringerof_D · 06-29-2009, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crAck_sh0t

The Western factions equipment is superior in real life and as such should be in the game also.

That is a lie and you know it. the only reason it seems that way is because the US are one of the few countries that are constantly showing off their stuff. which is why everyone knows of their equipment. it's like TV shows and movies, everyone thinks the mainstream shows are better but that's cause they get more funding for advertising. but we all know that those large well funded projects are all crap these days they still look amazing in all the add campaigns. If you were to do some actual research on say China or Israel's military equipment you will find that they have the world's best equipment, china is questionable but ISrael definetly has equipment that far out performs any western counterpart.

on another note, the non western factions get all the nice stuff because that's where the devs and modelers are interested in. they're not obligated to make anything. if they feel more interested in making a new US tank than a chinese tank then so be it. the NWACHNT effect only really applies to actual games on the market. mods tend to be more evenly balanced

Solid Knight · 06-29-2009, 10:42 PM

The floating issue can be fixed. /END THREAD

LeadMagnet · 06-29-2009, 11:02 PM

Closed at the request of the OP

06-29-2009, 10:20 AM	#11
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto PR Mapper Team Join Date: May 2006 United States of America Location: Indiana Posts: 9,385 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water WHINING/DEBATING ABOUT ASSETS IN THIS THREAD STOPS NOW Thank you
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

06-29-2009, 10:23 AM	#12
~~sakils2~~ Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Latvia Location: Riga, Latvia\| Northern Europe Posts: 1,382	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water Shouldn't there be a lock, then? BTW, does my sig break any forum laws?

06-29-2009, 10:26 AM	#13
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto PR Mapper Team Join Date: May 2006 United States of America Location: Indiana Posts: 9,385 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water You can still discuss the BMP floating... if you wish... or why i did it, or whatever. Just dont whine or debate assets and how PR is ruining all your lives And no, doesnt break any rules that I see
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

06-29-2009, 12:14 PM	#14
Cheditor Join Date: Mar 2009 United Kingdom Location: london Posts: 2,361	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water JDMT what was the point of this thread may i ask? It looks like your reporting a bug but that belongs in the Bug section of the forums and if you were asking if it was bugged then you were already told in your other BMP-3 thread that it was bugged.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

06-29-2009, 07:54 PM	#16
Fighter Join Date: Nov 2008 United States of America Posts: 1,102	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water But this is combined arms, isnt it? Or did I overlook that? (Forget what I just said (smacks self in forehead after reading OP ) Easily fixable bug.
	"Just came ho,me. It was fun as fuaaaarrrrk. I think I'm still fdrunk. Will post pics tomorrow lol. Good night. Oh, and my hair is fucking WATERPROOF." - Kirra

06-29-2009, 10:42 PM	#18
Solid Knight Join Date: Sep 2008 United States of America Posts: 2,197	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water The floating issue can be fixed. /END THREAD

06-29-2009, 11:02 PM	#19
LeadMagnet Former Testing Manager Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,662	Re: Why PR Will NEVER have a BMP on a Map with Water Closed at the request of the OP
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. “Without Warning, Sans Remorse”

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links