PR Gameplay

[Resjah]

This is a simple poll, I would just like to know If you think the Project Reality Mini-Mod and eventual Full version of the mod is geared towards mostly Infantry, Mostly Vehicles, a Mix between the two. Then state your opinion, on wether you feel PR should apply itself more to infantry combat, vehicle combat etc, or anything other idea you may have.

Vote honestly please

Edit: Thx Egg
\/

[eggman]

Deleted these posts because this is incredibly useful information for the PR devs and I don't think we need a pissing contest putting ppl off the thread.

Y'all need to lighten up m'kay?

egg

[Doc]

PR really should be mostly about the infantry, making vehicles actually an asset to the team.

[Skullening.Chris]

I voted that it's a good balance, because most of the more popular servers seem to have limitations in place anyhow, so I never really find myself becoming too frustrated by vehicles.

[Crawley]

PR really should be mostly about the infantry, making vehicles actually an asset to the team.

Agree

[ai17]

I say "other". BF2 is a heavily infantry based game, with vehicles thrown into the mix. Naturally PR will be more or less the same. There's no way w/ the limitations of BF2 you could realisticly achieve the scope of actual combined arms combat (outside of an urban environment). PR should be a good mix between the two (depending on environment). However, given that you can enter and drive any vehicle on the battlefield at will (As opposed to them already being manned by fully trained crews [reality]), this limits the ability to balance the realistic w/ playability.

It should really be determined on a map by map basis what vehicles will be included and in what quantity dependant on map size. Given that BF2, is more inantry focused than vehicle, it's only natural to assume that PR will essentially be the "same". Essentially the best PR could emulate combat, would be at a small level (i.e. platoon v. platoon).

[Skeletor]

PR is and should be all about infantry. Vehicles like the Little Bird and Black Hawk are awesome, but the increased damage actually makes infantry very powerful in PR, whereas they were fairly weak in BF2, so I think it all comes down to the tense infantry battles that BF2 lacked. Tanks and stuff like that should be limited.

But please put lots of Little Birds everywhere. I loved those things in Desert Combat.

[Dark Ewok]

PR should be all about combined arms operations. I am sick and tired of all these "infantry only simulators" if that's what you want go to CounterStrike.

DICE gave us the capability to incorporate vehicles in the game. I say let's use that to our advantage as much as we can!
If you want to have some infantry only maps, sure go ahead, but to make PR into an infantry only mod is just plain wrong, imo.

I believe that the Devs have stated, somewhere on these boards, that they will try to make it a good mix and I, for one, put my faith in the devs!

"Oh, ye Devs, don't ye fail me now!"

[Top_Cat_AxJnAt]

I like a mixture, personally i like atot of maps with a few transport choppers and lots of humveess.
About 1 in 3 should have tanks but when they are addded i like to see them in pairs BUT still like to see alot of jeeps. I personaly dislike attaact choppers and belive that they should be only on a few big maps due to their power.

I also prefer the balck hawk to the littlebird due to it's size and hopefully later on it ability to carry a large number of peeps.

Main point: more humvees and vodnicks!!!! P.S i hate the LAV, it is horrible, no one uses it for troop transport often and jsut go round tank huntng with its bloody TOW, IT DOES not improve gameplay in its present state on PR today.

[Eglaerinion]

PR should be about both, have open maps ideal for vehicle combat, urban maps with little vehicle support (only AFV) and combined arms maps where vehicles and infantry fight on varying terrain (outskirts and city for example).

Restricting to one aspect will mean less fun.